Andrew Althouse

Dr. Andrew Althouse


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2016 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAndrew Althouse
Andrew Althouse

22 December 2014 in Future Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSM Aamir Sheikh
M Aamir Sheikh
AAAndrew Althouse
Andrew Althouse
KFKyle E Freese
Kyle E Freese
SSSean Soisson
Sean Soisson
RERobert P Edwards
Robert P Edwards
FLFaina Linkov
Faina Linkov
As the incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) increased considerably since 2007, this study aimed to project the burden of EC to the year 2030. Multivariate linear regression was used to project EC incidence by modeling trends in EC incidence from 1990 to 2013, while accounting for temporal changes in obesity, hysterectomy and smoking. The best-fitting model predicting EC rates included a time effect plus effects for hysterectomy (12-year lag), severe obesity (3-year lag) and smoking (9-year lag). The best-fitting model projected an increase to 42.13 EC cases per 100,000 by the year 2030, a 55% increase over 2010 EC rates. The projected increase of EC over next 16 years indicates the need for close monitoring of EC trends.

7 December 2016 in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJoão L. Cavalcante
João L. Cavalcante
SRShasank Rijal
Shasank Rijal
IAIslam Abdelkarim
Islam Abdelkarim
AAAndrew Althouse
Andrew Althouse
MSMichael S. Sharbaugh
Michael S. Sharbaugh
ESErik B. Schelbert
Erik B. Schelbert
Non-invasive cardiac imaging allows detection of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of clinically suspected CA in patients with moderate and severe AS referred for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in age and gender categories, and assess associations between AS-CA and all-cause mortality. We retrospectively identified consecutive AS patients defined by echocardiography referred for further CMR assessment of valvular, myocardial, and aortic disease. CMR identified CA based on typical late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) patterns, and ancillary clinical evaluation identified suspected CA. Survival analysis with the Log rank test and Cox regression compared associations between CA and mortality. There were 113 patients (median age 74 years, Q1-Q3: 62–82 years), 96 (85%) with severe AS. Suspected CA was present in 9 patients (8%) all > 80 years. Among those over the median age of 74 years, the prevalence of CA was 9/57 (16%), and excluding women, the prevalence was 8/25 (32%). Low-flow, low-gradient physiology was very common in CA (7/9 patients or 78%). Over a median follow-up of 18 months, 40 deaths (35%) occurred. Mortality in AS + CA patients was higher than AS alone (56% vs. 20% at 1-year, log rank 15.0, P < 0.0001). Adjusting for aortic valve replacement modeled as a time-dependent covariate, Society of Thoracic Surgery predicted risk of mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction, CA remained associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 2.92, 95% CI = 1.09–7.86, P = 0.03). Suspected CA appears prevalent among older male patients with AS, especially with low flow, low gradient AS, and associates with all-cause mortality. The importance of screening for CA in older AS patients and optimal treatment strategies in those with CA warrant further investigation, especially in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

1 September 2015 in Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJoost Lumens
Joost Lumens
BTBhupendar Tayal
Bhupendar Tayal
JWJohn Walmsley
John Walmsley
ADAntonia Delgado-Montero
Antonia Delgado-Montero
PHPeter R. Huntjens
Peter R. Huntjens
JGJohn Gorcsan
John Gorcsan
Background—: Left ventricular (LV) mechanical discoordination, often referred to as dyssynchrony, is often observed in patients with heart failure regardless of QRS duration. We hypothesized that different myocardial substrates for LV mechanical discoordination exist from (1) electromechanical activation delay, (2) regional differences in contractility, or (3) regional scar and that we could differentiate electromechanical substrates responsive to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) from unresponsive non–electrical substrates. Methods and Results—: First, we used computer simulations to characterize mechanical discoordination patterns arising from electromechanical and non–electrical substrates and accordingly devise the novel systolic stretch index (SSI), as the sum of posterolateral systolic prestretch and septal systolic rebound stretch. Second, 191 patients with heart failure (QRS duration ≥120 ms; LV ejection fraction ≤35%) had baseline SSI quantified by automated echocardiographic radial strain analysis. Patients with SSI≥9.7% had significantly less heart failure hospitalizations or deaths 2 years after CRT (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.53; P <0.001) and less deaths, transplants, or LV assist devices (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.15–0.55; P <0.001). Furthermore, in a subgroup of 113 patients with intermediate electrocardiographic criteria (QRS duration of 120–149 ms or non–left bundle branch block), SSI≥9.7% was independently associated with significantly less heart failure hospitalizations or deaths (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.79; P =0.004) and less deaths, transplants, or LV assist devices (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.60; P =0.001). Conclusions—: Computer simulations differentiated patterns of LV mechanical discoordination caused by electromechanical substrates responsive to CRT from those related to regional hypocontractility or scar unresponsive to CRT. The novel SSI identified patients who benefited more favorably from CRT, including those with intermediate electrocardiographic criteria, where CRT response is less certain by ECG alone.

14 September 2013 in Diabetes Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRodica Pop-Busui
Rodica Pop-Busui
JLJiang Lu
Jiang Lu
MBMaria Mori Mori Brooks
Maria Mori Mori Brooks
SAStewart Albert
Stewart Albert
AAAndrew Althouse
Andrew Althouse
TJTeresa L.Z. Jones
Teresa L.Z. Jones
OBJECTIVE The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial demonstrated similar long-term clinical effectiveness of insulin-sensitizing (IS) versus insulin-providing (IP) treatments for type 2 diabetes on cardiovascular outcomes in a cohort with documented coronary artery disease. We evaluated the effects of randomized glycemic control strategy (IS vs. IP) on the prevalence and incidence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS DPN (defined as Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument [MNSI] clinical examination score >2) was assessed at baseline and yearly for 4 years. DPN prevalence and incidence were compared by intention-to-treat modeling by logistic generalized estimating equation models for prevalence and Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models for incidence rates. RESULTS Results are reported for 2,159 BARI 2D participants (70% males) with valid baseline and at least one follow-up MNSI score (mean age 62 ± 9 years, mean HbA1c 7.7 ± 1.6%, diabetes duration 10 ± 9 years). There were no differences in the prevalence of DPN between the IS and the IP groups throughout the 4 years of follow-up. In 1,075 BARI 2D participants with no DPN at baseline, the 4-year cumulative incidence rate of DPN was significantly lower in the IS (66%) than in the IP (72%) strategy group (P = 0.02), which remained significant after adjusting for the in-trial HbA1c (P = 0.04). In subgroup analyses, IS strategy had a greater benefit in men (hazard ratio 0.75 [99% CI 0.58–0.99], P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with type 2 diabetes followed for up to 4 years during BARI 2D, a glycemic control therapy with IS significantly reduced the incidence of DPN compared with IP therapy and may add further benefit for men.

19 April 2012 in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLeslee J. Shaw
Leslee J. Shaw
MCManuel D. Cerqueira
Manuel D. Cerqueira
MBMaria Mori Mori Brooks
Maria Mori Mori Brooks
AAAndrew Althouse
Andrew Althouse
VSVeronica V. Sansing
Veronica V. Sansing
AIAmi E. Iskandrian
Ami E. Iskandrian