Lee E. E. Ratner

Dr. Lee E. E. Ratner


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 1994 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NHN K Heinzinger
N K Heinzinger
MBM I Bukinsky
M I Bukinsky
SHS A Haggerty
S A Haggerty
ARA M Ragland
A M Ragland
VKV Kewalramani
V Kewalramani
MEM Emerman
M Emerman
The replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in nondividing host cells such as those of macrophage lineage is an important feature of AIDS pathogenesis. The pattern of HIV-1 replication is dictated, in part, by the nucleophilic property of the viral gag matrix (MA) protein, a component of the viral preintegration complex that facilitates nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids in the absence of mitosis. We now identify the accessory viral protein Vpr, as a second nucleophilic component that influences nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids in nondividing cells. Reverse transcription and nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids following infection of cells by viruses lacking Vpr or viruses containing mutations in a gag MA nuclear localization sequence were indistinguishable from the pattern observed in cells infected by wild-type HIV-1. These viruses retained the ability to replicate in both dividing and nondividing host cells including monocyte-derived macrophages. In contrast, introduction of both gag MA and Vpr mutations in HIV-1 attenuated nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids in nondividing cells and virus replication in monocyte-derived macrophages. These studies demonstrate redundant nucleophilic determinants of HIV-1 that independently permit nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids and virus replication in nondividing cells such as monocyte-derived macrophages. In addition, these studies provide a defined function for an accessory gene product of HIV-1.

15 September 2000 in Journal of Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CDCynthia A. Derdeyn
Cynthia A. Derdeyn
JDJulie M. Decker
Julie M. Decker
JSJeffrey N. Sfakianos
Jeffrey N. Sfakianos
XWXiaoyun Wu
Xiaoyun Wu
WOWilliam A. O'Brien
William A. O'Brien
EHEric Hunter
Eric Hunter
T-20 is a synthetic peptide that potently inhibits replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by interfering with the transition of the transmembrane protein, gp41, to a fusion active state following interactions of the surface glycoprotein, gp120, with CD4 and coreceptor molecules displayed on the target cell surface. Although T-20 is postulated to interact with an N-terminal heptad repeat within gp41 in a trans -dominant manner, we show here that sensitivity to T-20 is strongly influenced by coreceptor specificity. When 14 T-20-naive primary isolates were analyzed for sensitivity to T-20, the mean 50% inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) for isolates that utilize CCR5 for entry (R5 viruses) was 0.8 log 10 higher than the mean IC 50 for CXCR4 (X4) isolates ( P = 0.0055). Using NL4.3-based envelope chimeras that contain combinations of envelope sequences derived from R5 and X4 viruses, we found that determinants of coreceptor specificity contained within the gp120 V3 loop modulate this sensitivity to T-20. The IC 50 for all chimeric envelope viruses containing R5 V3 sequences was 0.6 to 0.8 log 10 higher than that for viruses containing X4 V3 sequences. In addition, we confirmed that the N-terminal heptad repeat of gp41 determines the baseline sensitivity to T-20 and that the IC 50 for viruses containing GIV at amino acid residues 36 to 38 was 1.0 log 10 lower than the IC 50 for viruses containing a G-to-D substitution. The results of this study show that gp120-coreceptor interactions and the gp41 N-terminal heptad repeat independently contribute to sensitivity to T-20. These results have important implications for the therapeutic uses of T-20 as well as for unraveling the complex mechanisms of virus fusion and entry.

20 January 2009 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KTKunihiro Tsukasaki
Kunihiro Tsukasaki
OHOlivier Hermine
Olivier Hermine
Ali BazarbachiAli Bazarbachi
Ali Bazarbachi
LRLee E. E. Ratner
Lee E. E. Ratner
JRJuan Carlos Ramos
Juan Carlos Ramos
TWToshiki Watanabe
Toshiki Watanabe
Adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) is a distinct peripheral T-lymphocytic malignancy associated with a retrovirus designated human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-1). The diversity in clinical features and prognosis of patients with this disease has led to its subclassification into the following four categories: acute, lymphoma, chronic, and smoldering types. The chronic and smoldering subtypes are considered indolent and are usually managed with watchful waiting until disease progression, analogous to the management of some patients with chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL) or other indolent histology lymphomas. Patients with aggressive ATL generally have a poor prognosis because of multidrug resistance of malignant cells, a large tumor burden with multiorgan failure, hypercalcemia, and/or frequent infectious complications as a result of a profound T-cell immunodeficiency. Under the sponsorship of the 13th International Conference on Human Retrovirology: HTLV, a group of ATL researchers joined to form a consensus statement based on established data to define prognostic factors, clinical subclassifications, and treatment strategies. A set of response criteria specific for ATL reflecting a combination of those for lymphoma and CLL was proposed. Clinical subclassification is useful but is limited because of the diverse prognosis among each subtype. Molecular abnormalities within the host genome, such as tumor suppressor genes, may account for these diversities. A treatment strategy based on the clinical subclassification and prognostic factors is suggested, including watchful waiting approach, chemotherapy, antiviral therapy, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT), and targeted therapies.

22 March 2009 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGShimon Gross
Shimon Gross
SGSeth Gammon
Seth Gammon
BMBritney L Moss
Britney L Moss
DRDaniel Rauch
Daniel Rauch
JHJohn Harding
John Harding
DPDavid Piwnica-Worms
David Piwnica-Worms

14 February 1995 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WGW J Grossman
W J Grossman
JKJason Kimata
Jason Kimata
FWF H Wong
F H Wong
MZM Zutter
M Zutter
TLT J Ley
T J Ley
LRLee E. E. Ratner
Lee E. E. Ratner
The human T-cell leukemia virus type I Tax protein trans-activates several cellular genes implicated in T-cell replication and activation. To investigate its leukemogenic potential, Tax was targeted to the mature T-lymphocyte compartment in transgenic mice by using the human granzyme B promoter. These mice developed large granular lymphocytic leukemia, demonstrating that expression of Tax in the lymphocyte compartment is sufficient for the development of leukemia. Furthermore, these observations suggest that human T-cell leukemia virus infection may be involved in the development of large granular lymphocytic leukemia.

1 September 2000 in Current Opinion in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTBenjamin Tan
Benjamin Tan
DPDavid Piwnica-Worms
David Piwnica-Worms
LRLee E. E. Ratner
Lee E. E. Ratner
Multidrug resistance (MDR), whereby tumor cells simultaneously possess intrinsic or acquired cross-resistance to diverse chemotherapeutic agents, hampers the effective treatment of cancer. Molecular investigations in MDR resulted in the isolation and characterization of genes coding for several proteins associated with MDR, including P-glycoprotein (P-gp), the multidrug resistance associated protein (MRP1), the lung resistance protein (LRP), and, more recently, the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). These transmembrane proteins cause MDR either by decreasing the total intracellular retention of drugs or redistributing intracellular accumulation of drugs away from target organelles. These proteins are expressed at varying degrees in different neoplasms, including the AIDS-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Kaposi sarcoma and are generally associated with poor prognosis. Several MDR-reversing agents are in various stages of clinical development. First-generation modulators such as verapamil, quinidine, and cyclosporin required high doses of drugs to reverse MDR and were associated with unacceptable toxicities. Second-and third-generation MDR inhibitors include PSC 833, GF120918, VX-710, and LY335979, among others. Limitations to the use of these modulators include multiple and redundant cellular mechanisms of resistance, alterations in pharmacokinetics of cytotoxic agents, and clinical toxicities. Studies to validate the role of MDR reversal in the treatment of various malignancies are underway. A potential use of these agents may be to enhance intestinal drug absorption and increase drug penetration to biologically important protective barriers, such as the blood-brain, blood-cerebrospinal fluid, and the maternal-fetal barriers. The use of MDR modulators with drugs such as the antiviral protease inhibitors and cytotoxics may enhance drug accumulation in sanctuary sites that are traditionally impenetrable to these agents. Curr Opin Oncol 2000, 12:450–458 © 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.