Clay Sneller

Dr. Clay Sneller


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 June 2016 in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMao Huang
Mao Huang
ACAntonio Cabrera
Antonio Cabrera
AHAmber Hoffstetter
Amber Hoffstetter
CGCarl Griffey
Carl Griffey
DSDavid Van Sanford
David Van Sanford
CSClay Sneller
Clay Sneller

1 March 2009 in Crop Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CSClay Sneller
Clay Sneller
DMDiane Mather
Diane Mather
SCS. Crepieux
S. Crepieux

26 July 2019 in Molecular Breeding
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMao Huang
Mao Huang
EBElias G. Balimponya
Elias G. Balimponya
EMEmmanuel M. Mgonja
Emmanuel M. Mgonja
LMLeah K. McHale
Leah K. McHale
ALAshura Luzi-Kihupi
Ashura Luzi-Kihupi
CSClay Sneller
Clay Sneller

1 September 2016 in G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAmber Hoffstetter
Amber Hoffstetter
ACAntonio Cabrera
Antonio Cabrera
MHMao Huang
Mao Huang
CSClay Sneller
Clay Sneller
Genomic selection (GS) is a breeding tool that estimates breeding values (GEBVs) of individuals based solely on marker data by using a model built using phenotypic and marker data from a training population (TP). The effectiveness of GS increases as the correlation of GEBVs and phenotypes (accuracy) increases. Using phenotypic and genotypic data from a TP of 470 soft winter wheat lines, we assessed the accuracy of GS for grain yield, Fusarium Head Blight (FHB) resistance, softness equivalence (SE), and flour yield (FY). Four TP data sampling schemes were tested: (1) use all TP data, (2) use subsets of TP lines with low genotype-by-environment interaction, (3) use subsets of markers significantly associated with quantitative trait loci (QTL), and (4) a combination of 2 and 3. We also correlated the phenotypes of relatives of the TP to their GEBVs calculated from TP data. The GS accuracy within the TP using all TP data ranged from 0.35 (FHB) to 0.62 (FY). On average, the accuracy of GS from using subsets of data increased by 54% relative to using all TP data. Using subsets of markers selected for significant association with the target trait had the greatest impact on GS accuracy. Between-environment prediction accuracy was also increased by using data subsets. The accuracy of GS when predicting the phenotypes of TP relatives ranged from 0.00 to 0.85. These results suggest that GS could be useful for these traits and GS accuracy can be greatly improved by using subsets of TP data.

1 November 2003 in Crop Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NRN. Reyna
N. Reyna
BCB. Cornelious
B. Cornelious
JSJ. G. Shannon
J. G. Shannon
CSClay Sneller
Clay Sneller

19 November 2013 in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SLSungwoo Lee
Sungwoo Lee
MMM. A. Rouf Mian
M. A. Rouf Mian
CSClay Sneller
Clay Sneller
HWHehe Wang
Hehe Wang
ADAnne E. Dorrance
Anne E. Dorrance
LMLeah McHale
Leah McHale