The fine balance between the secretion, composition, volume and turnover of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is strictly regulated. However, during certain neurological diseases, this balance can be disrupted. A significant disruption to the normal CSF circulation can be life threatening, leading to increased intracranial pressure (ICP), and is implicated in hydrocephalus, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, brain trauma, brain tumours and stroke. Yet, the exact cellular, molecular and physiological mechanisms that contribute to altered hydrodynamic pathways in these diseases are poorly defined or hotly debated. The traditional views and concepts of CSF secretion, flow and drainage have been challenged, also due to recent findings suggesting more complex mechanisms of brain fluid dynamics than previously proposed. This review evaluates and summarises current hypotheses of CSF dynamics and presents evidence for the role of impaired CSF dynamics in elevated ICP, alongside discussion of the proteins that are potentially involved in altered CSF physiology during neurological disease. Undoubtedly CSF secretion, absorption and drainage are important aspects of brain fluid homeostasis in maintaining a stable ICP. Traditionally, pharmacological interventions or CSF drainage have been used to reduce ICP elevation due to over production of CSF. However, these drugs are used only as a temporary solution due to their undesirable side effects. Emerging evidence suggests that pharmacological targeting of aquaporins, transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4 (TRPV4), and the Na+–K+–2Cl− cotransporter (NKCC1) merit further investigation as potential targets in neurological diseases involving impaired brain fluid dynamics and elevated ICP.

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) secretion can be targeted to reduce elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Sodium-potassium-chloride cotransporter 1 (NKCC1) antagonism is used clinically. However, supporting evidence is limited. The transient receptor potential vanilloid-4 (TRPV4) channel may also regulate CSF secretion and ICP elevation. We investigated whether antagonism of these proteins reduces CSF secretion. Methods: We quantified CSF secretion rates in male Wistar rats. The cerebral aqueduct was blocked with viscous mineral oil, and a lateral ventricle was cannulated. Secretion rate was measured at baseline and after antagonist administration. Acetazolamide was administered as a positive control to confirm changes in CSF secretion rates. Results: Neither NKCC1, nor TRPV4 antagonism altered CSF secretion rate from baseline, n = 3, t(2) = 1.14, p = 0.37, and n = 4, t(3) = 0.58, p = 0.6, respectively. Acetazolamide reduced CSF secretion by ~50% across all groups, n = 7, t(6) = 4.294, p = 0.005. Conclusions: Acute antagonism of NKCC1 and TRPV4 proteins at the choroid plexus does not reduce CSF secretion in healthy rats. Further investigation of protein changes and antagonism should be explored in neurological disease where increased CSF secretion and ICP are observed before discounting the therapeutic potential of protein antagonism at these sites.

Background: Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) occurs 18–24 h after ischaemic stroke and is implicated as a potential cause of early neurological deterioration. Increased resistance to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) outflow after ischaemic stroke is a proposed mechanism for ICP elevation. Ultra-short duration hypothermia prevents ICP elevation 24 h post-stroke in rats. We aimed to determine whether hypothermia would reduce CSF outflow resistance post-stroke. Methods: Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion was performed, followed by gradual cooling to 33 °C. At 18 h post-stroke, CSF outflow resistance was measured using a steady-state infusion method. Results: Hypothermia to 33 °C prevented ICP elevation 18 h post-stroke (hypothermia ∆ICP = 0.8 ± 3.6 mmHg vs. normothermia ∆ICP = 4.4 ± 2.0 mmHg, p = 0.04) and reduced infarct volume 24 h post-stroke (hypothermia = 78.6 ± 21.3 mm³ vs. normothermia = 108.1 ± 17.8 mm³; p = 0.01). Hypothermia to 33 °C did not result in a significant reduction in CSF outflow resistance compared with normothermia controls (0.32 ± 0.36 mmHg/µL/min vs. 1.07 ± 0.99 mmHg/µL/min, p = 0.06). Conclusions: Hypothermia treatment was protective in terms of ICP rise prevention, infarct volume reduction, and may be implicated in CSF outflow resistance post-stroke. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the mechanisms of ICP elevation and hypothermia treatment.