William Johnson

Dr. William Johnson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 June 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WJWilliam Johnson
William Johnson
AMAjmal Mian
Ajmal Mian
MRMark A. Robinson
Mark A. Robinson
JVJasper Verheul
Jasper Verheul
DLDavid Lloyd
David Lloyd
Jacqueline AldersonJacqueline Alderson
Jacqueline Alderson
Objective: Monitoring athlete internal workload exposure, including prevention of catastrophic non-contact knee injuries, relies on the existence of a custom early-warning detection system. This system must be able to estimate accurate, reliable, and valid musculoskeletal joint loads, for sporting maneuvers in near real-time and during match play. However, current methods are constrained to laboratory instrumentation, are labor and cost intensive, and require highly trained specialist knowledge, thereby limiting their ecological validity and wider deployment. An informative next step towards this goal would be a new method to obtain ground kinetics in the field. Methods: Here we show that kinematic data obtained from wearable sensor accelerometers, in lieu of embedded force platforms, can leverage recent supervised learning techniques to predict in-game near real-time multidimensional ground reaction forces and moments (GRF/M). Competing convolutional neural network (CNN) deep learning models were trained using laboratory-derived stance phase GRF/M data and simulated sensor accelerations for running and sidestepping maneuvers derived from nearly half a million legacy motion trials. Then, predictions were made from each model driven by five sensor accelerations recorded during independent inter-laboratory data capture sessions. Results: The proposed deep learning workbench achieved correlations to ground truth, by maximum discrete GRF component, of vertical Fz 0.97, anterior Fy 0.96 (both running), and lateral Fx 0.87 (sidestepping), with the strongest mean recorded across GRF components 0.89, and for GRM 0.65 (both sidestepping). Conclusion: These best-case correlations indicate the plausibility of the approach although the range of results was disappointing. The goal to accurately estimate near real-time on-field GRF/M will be improved by the lessons learned in this study. Significance: Coaching, medical, and allied health staff could ultimately use this technology to monitor a range of joint loading indicators during game play, with the aim to minimize the occurrence of non-contact injuries in elite and community-level sports.

1 July 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarion Mundt
Marion Mundt
WJWilliam Johnson
William Johnson
WPWolfgang Potthast
Wolfgang Potthast
Bernd MarkertBernd Markert
Bernd Markert
AMAjmal Mian
Ajmal Mian
Jacqueline AldersonJacqueline Alderson
Jacqueline Alderson
The application of artificial intelligence techniques to wearable sensor data may facilitate accurate analysis outside of controlled laboratory settings—the holy grail for gait clinicians and sports scientists looking to bridge the lab to field divide. Using these techniques, parameters that are difficult to directly measure in-the-wild, may be predicted using surrogate lower resolution inputs. One example is the prediction of joint kinematics and kinetics based on inputs from inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. Despite increased research, there is a paucity of information examining the most suitable artificial neural network (ANN) for predicting gait kinematics and kinetics from IMUs. This paper compares the performance of three commonly employed ANNs used to predict gait kinematics and kinetics: multilayer perceptron (MLP); long short-term memory (LSTM); and convolutional neural networks (CNN). Overall high correlations between ground truth and predicted kinematic and kinetic data were found across all investigated ANNs. However, the optimal ANN should be based on the prediction task and the intended use-case application. For the prediction of joint angles, CNNs appear favourable, however these ANNs do not show an advantage over an MLP network for the prediction of joint moments. If real-time joint angle and joint moment prediction is desirable an LSTM network should be utilised.

9 July 2018 in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WJWilliam Johnson
William Johnson
Jacqueline AldersonJacqueline Alderson
Jacqueline Alderson
DLDavid Lloyd
David Lloyd
AMAjmal Mian
Ajmal Mian
The accurate prediction of three-dimensional (3-D) ground reaction forces and moments (GRF/Ms) outside the laboratory setting would represent a watershed for on-field biomechanical analysis. To extricate the biomechanist's reliance on ground embedded force plates, this study sought to improve on an earlier partial least squares (PLS) approach by using deep learning to predict 3-D GRF/Ms from legacy marker based motion capture sidestepping trials, ranking multivariate regression of GRF/Ms from five convolutional neural network (CNN) models. In a possible first for biomechanics, tactical feature engineering techniques were used to compress space-time and facilitate fine-tuning from three pretrained CNNs, from which a model derivative of ImageNet called “CaffeNet” achieved the strongest average correlation to ground truth GRF/Ms r (F mean ) 0.9881 and r (M mean ) 0.9715 ( r RMSE 4.31 and 7.04%). These results demonstrate the power of CNN models to facilitate real-world multivariate regression with practical application for spatio-temporal sports analytics.

17 March 2018 in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WJWilliam Johnson
William Johnson
AMAjmal Mian
Ajmal Mian
CDCyril J. Donnelly
Cyril J. Donnelly
DLDavid Lloyd
David Lloyd
Jacqueline AldersonJacqueline Alderson
Jacqueline Alderson

1 August 2019 in Journal of Biomechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WJWilliam Johnson
William Johnson
AMAjmal Mian
Ajmal Mian
DLDavid G. Lloyd
David G. Lloyd
Jacqueline AldersonJacqueline Alderson
Jacqueline Alderson

1 May 2021 in AEA Papers and Proceedings
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WJWilliam Johnson
William Johnson
GHGinny Herbert
Ginny Herbert
Editors' Introduction by William R. Johnson and Ginny Herbert. Published in volume 111, pages xiii of AEA Papers and Proceedings, May 2021