Nathaniel Huebsch

Dr. Nathaniel Huebsch


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 November 2015 in Nature Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OCOvijit Chaudhuri
Ovijit Chaudhuri
LGLuo Gu
Luo Gu
DKDarinka Klumpers
Darinka Klumpers
MDMax Darnell
Max Darnell
SIDI A. BENCHERIFSIDI A. BENCHERIF
SIDI A. BENCHERIF
DMDavid J. Mooney
David J. Mooney
Natural extracellular matrices (ECMs) are viscoelastic and exhibit stress relaxation. However, hydrogels used as synthetic ECMs for three-dimensional (3D) culture are typically elastic. Here, we report a materials approach to tune the rate of stress relaxation of hydrogels for 3D culture, independently of the hydrogel’s initial elastic modulus, degradation, and cell-adhesion-ligand density. We find that cell spreading, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are all enhanced in cells cultured in gels with faster relaxation. Strikingly, MSCs form a mineralized, collagen-1-rich matrix similar to bone in rapidly relaxing hydrogels with an initial elastic modulus of 17 kPa. We also show that the effects of stress relaxation are mediated by adhesion-ligand binding, actomyosin contractility and mechanical clustering of adhesion ligands. Our findings highlight stress relaxation as a key characteristic of cell–ECM interactions and as an important design parameter of biomaterials for cell culture.

25 April 2010 in Nature Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NHNathaniel Huebsch
Nathaniel Huebsch
PAPraveen Arany
Praveen Arany
AMAngelo S. Mao
Angelo S. Mao
DSDmitry Shvartsman
Dmitry Shvartsman
OAOmar A. Ali
Omar A. Ali
DMDavid J. Mooney
David J. Mooney
Stem cells sense and respond to the mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix. However, both the extent to which extracellular-matrix mechanics affect stem-cell fate in three-dimensional microenvironments and the underlying biophysical mechanisms are unclear. We demonstrate that the commitment of mesenchymal stem-cell populations changes in response to the rigidity of three-dimensional microenvironments, with osteogenesis occurring predominantly at 11–30 kPa. In contrast to previous two-dimensional work, however, cell fate was not correlated with morphology. Instead, matrix stiffness regulated integrin binding as well as reorganization of adhesion ligands on the nanoscale, both of which were traction dependent and correlated with osteogenic commitment of mesenchymal stem-cell populations. These findings suggest that cells interpret changes in the physical properties of adhesion substrates as changes in adhesion-ligand presentation, and that cells themselves can be harnessed as tools to mechanically process materials into structures that feed back to manipulate their fate.

19 February 2015 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OCOvijit Chaudhuri
Ovijit Chaudhuri
LGLuo Gu
Luo Gu
MDMax Darnell
Max Darnell
DKDarinka Klumpers
Darinka Klumpers
SIDI A. BENCHERIFSIDI A. BENCHERIF
SIDI A. BENCHERIF
DMDavid J. Mooney
David J. Mooney
Studies of cellular mechanotransduction have converged upon the idea that cells sense extracellular matrix (ECM) elasticity by gauging resistance to the traction forces they exert on the ECM. However, these studies typically utilize purely elastic materials as substrates, whereas physiological ECMs are viscoelastic, and exhibit stress relaxation, so that cellular traction forces exerted by cells remodel the ECM. Here we investigate the influence of ECM stress relaxation on cell behaviour through computational modelling and cellular experiments. Surprisingly, both our computational model and experiments find that spreading for cells cultured on soft substrates that exhibit stress relaxation is greater than cells spreading on elastic substrates of the same modulus, but similar to that of cells spreading on stiffer elastic substrates. These findings challenge the current view of how cells sense and respond to the ECM.

25 November 2009 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NHNathaniel Huebsch
Nathaniel Huebsch
DMDavid J. Mooney
David J. Mooney

9 March 2015 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAnurag Mathur
Anurag Mathur
Peter LoskillPeter Loskill
Peter Loskill
KSKaifeng Shao
Kaifeng Shao
NHNathaniel Huebsch
Nathaniel Huebsch
SHSoonGweon Hong
SoonGweon Hong
KHKevin E. Healy
Kevin E. Healy
Drug discovery and development are hampered by high failure rates attributed to the reliance on non-human animal models employed during safety and efficacy testing. A fundamental problem in this inefficient process is that non-human animal models cannot adequately represent human biology. Thus, there is an urgent need for high-content in vitro systems that can better predict drug-induced toxicity. Systems that predict cardiotoxicity are of uppermost significance, as approximately one third of safety-based pharmaceutical withdrawals are due to cardiotoxicty. Here, we present a cardiac microphysiological system (MPS) with the attributes required for an ideal in vitro system to predict cardiotoxicity: i) cells with a human genetic background; ii) physiologically relevant tissue structure (e.g. aligned cells); iii) computationally predictable perfusion mimicking human vasculature; and, iv) multiple modes of analysis (e.g. biological, electrophysiological and physiological). Our MPS is able to keep human induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiac tissue viable and functional over multiple weeks. Pharmacological studies using the cardiac MPS show half maximal inhibitory/effective concentration values (IC50/EC50) that are more consistent with the data on tissue scale references compared to cellular scale studies. We anticipate the widespread adoption of MPSs for drug screening and disease modeling.

1 January 2011 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YKYash M. Kolambkar
Yash M. Kolambkar
KDKenneth M. Dupont
Kenneth M. Dupont
JBJoel D. Boerckel
Joel D. Boerckel
NHNathaniel Huebsch
Nathaniel Huebsch
DMDavid J. Mooney
David J. Mooney
RGRobert E. Guldberg
Robert E. Guldberg