Anna Dąbrowska

Dr. Anna Dąbrowska

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2017 in Journal of Marine Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAnna Dąbrowska
Anna Dąbrowska
JWJ.M. Wiktor
J.M. Wiktor
CGC. Griffiths
C. Griffiths
SKS. Kristiansen
S. Kristiansen
TGT.M. Gabrielsen
T.M. Gabrielsen

19 August 2023 in ISME Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFrancisco Pascoal
Francisco Pascoal
MTMaria Paola Tomasino
Maria Paola Tomasino
RPRoberta Piredda
Roberta Piredda
GQGrazia Marina Quero
Grazia Marina Quero
LTLuís Torgo
Luís Torgo
CMCatarina Magalhães
Catarina Magalhães
Research on marine microbial communities is growing, but studies are hard to compare because of variation in seawater sampling protocols. To help researchers in the inter-comparison of studies that use different seawater sampling methodologies, as well as to help them design future sampling campaigns, we developed the EuroMarine Open Science Exploration initiative (EMOSE). Within the EMOSE framework, we sampled thousands of liters of seawater from a single station in the NW Mediterranean Sea (Service d’Observation du Laboratoire Arago [SOLA], Banyuls-sur-Mer), during one single day. The resulting dataset includes multiple seawater processing approaches, encompassing different material-type kinds of filters (cartridge membrane and flat membrane), three different size fractionations (>0.22 µm, 0.22–3 µm, 3–20 µm and >20 µm), and a number of different seawater volumes ranging from 1 L up to 1000 L. We show that the volume of seawater that is filtered does not have a significant effect on prokaryotic and protist diversity, independently of the sequencing strategy. However, there was a clear difference in alpha and beta diversity between size fractions and between these and “whole water” (with no pre-fractionation). Overall, we recommend care when merging data from datasets that use filters of different pore size, but we consider that the type of filter and volume should not act as confounding variables for the tested sequencing strategies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time a publicly available dataset effectively allows for the clarification of the impact of marine microbiome methodological options across a wide range of protocols, including large-scale variations in sampled volume.


11 October 2022 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CDC. Dybwad
C. Dybwad
CLC. Lalande
C. Lalande
YBY. V. Bodur
Y. V. Bodur
SHS. F. Henley
S. F. Henley
FCF. Cottier
F. Cottier
MRM. Reigstad
M. Reigstad
The Arctic Ocean north of Svalbard has recently experienced large sea ice losses and the increasing prominence of Atlantic water (AW) advection. To investigate the impact of these ongoing changes on annual particle export, two moorings with sequential sediment traps were deployed in ice‐free and seasonally ice‐covered waters on the shelf north (NSv) and east (ESv) of Svalbard, collecting sinking particles nearly continuously from October 2017 to October 2018. Vertical export of particulate organic carbon (POC), total particulate matter (TPM), planktonic protists, chlorophyll a, and zooplankton fecal pellets were measured, and swimmers were quantified and identified. Combined with sensor data from the moorings, these time‐series measurements provided a first assessment of the factors influencing particle export in this region of the Arctic Ocean. Higher annual TPM and POC fluxes at the ice‐free NSv site were primarily driven by the advection of AW, higher grazing by large copepods, and a wind‐induced mixing event during winter. Higher diatom fluxes were observed during spring in the presence of sea ice at the ESv site. Along with sea ice cover, regional differences in AW advection and the seasonal presence of grazers played a prominent role in the biological carbon pump along the continental shelf off Svalbard.

27 July 2020 in Frontiers in Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAnna Dąbrowska
Anna Dąbrowska
JWJózef Mikołaj Wiktor
Józef Mikołaj Wiktor
MMMałgorzata Merchel
Małgorzata Merchel
JWJózef Maria Wiktor
Józef Maria Wiktor
The European Arctic is rapidly changing where increasing water temperatures and rapid loss of sea ice will likely influence the structure and functioning of the entire ecosystem. This study aimed to describe the taxonomic composition and spatial distribution of early summer (2015–2016) nano- and microplanktonic protists in the Nordic (Norwegian, Greenland) Seas and the Fram Strait (70.99°N to 78.84°N; 1.52°E to 19.90°E) and to determine the distribution patterns of the communities from the aspect of hydrography, as deduced from in situ measurements. Here we identify some generalized regularity in the protistan distribution, indicating the two separated domains at the 6°C threshold. While Phaeocystis seemed to be a fairly conservative representative of the colder area (6°C) may vary significantly between successive summers: from mostly Bacillariophyceae-dominated communities in 2015 to flagellate-dominated in 2016. Based on our results, we hypothesized that the more intense phototroph development in the area, as deduced from higher remotely sensed chlorophyll a concentrations in 2016, i.e., record warm year in the observational period, could lead to faster depletion of nutrients and, thus, an earlier shift into the post-bloom community stage. Taking into account the possible phenological shift toward early summer domination of flagellates in a warmer year, as well as a higher number of heterotrophic protists associated with the warmer domain in two evaluated summers, it is highly likely that climatic warming of this region will have an impact on energy transfer to higher trophic levels. Although generalized patterns could be elucidated, more information is needed to predict and understand how the changing Arctic will alter protistan communities and, thus, higher-order consumers.

20 July 2021 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAnna Dąbrowska
Anna Dąbrowska
JWJozef Wiktor
Jozef Wiktor
JWJózef Mikołaj Wiktor
Józef Mikołaj Wiktor
SKSvein Kristiansen
Svein Kristiansen
AVAnna Vader
Anna Vader
TGTove Gabrielsen
Tove Gabrielsen
As a contribution to understanding the ecological framework of protistan seasonal succession patterns, we present the weekly-to-monthly (January–October) light microscopy-based study of nano- and microplanktonic protist communities of Adventfjorden waters in 2013. In general, protist dynamics corresponded to the classic paradigm for the Arctic ice-free waters with extremely low abundance and diversity in winter, with the main abundance and chlorophyll-a peak in April-May, followed by a diverse but low abundant community during summer/autumn. However, the reference of the obtained data to the previously conducted year-round research in 2012 allows us to observe substantial variability in seasonal patterns between the two consecutive years. The most striking difference concerned the spring bloom composition and abundance, with clear domination of Phaeocystis pouchetii in Atlantified fjord waters in 2012 and Bacillariophyceae-dominated (mainly Fragilariopsis, Thalassiosira nordenskioeldii, and, in a lesser extent, also Pseudo-nitzschia seriata) bloom in 2013 when local water prevailed. On the other hand, a surprisingly high share of spring bloom taxa persisted throughout the summer/autumn of 2013 when they co-occurred with typical summer taxa (dinoflagellates and other small flagellates). Their extended growth could, at least in part, result from scarce Ciliophora throughout the season, which, in turn, can be attributed to the high grazing pressure of very numerous meroplankton and mesozooplankton. In light of this, our results may be relevant in discussions proposed for the West Spitsbergen waters link between the Atlantic water inflow and the spring bloom composition, as well as its further progression in the productive season. They also highlight the strong need for further high-resolution monitoring of annual plankton cycles and great caution when looking for phenological patterns within a single year or when interpreting short-term data.