Abhishek Singh

Dr. Abhishek Singh


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAmit Dey
Amit Dey
BKBhoj Kumar
Bhoj Kumar
ASAbhishek Singh
Abhishek Singh
PRPrakash Ranjan
Prakash Ranjan
RTRamachandran Thiruvengadam
Ramachandran Thiruvengadam
RGRakesh Gupta
Rakesh Gupta
The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in humans proceed through a continuous change of biochemical and biophysical processes. It requires a constant interaction between the fetus and the maternal system. The present prospective study aims to elucidate changes in salivary proteome from the early to middle stages of term pregnancy, and establishing an expressional trajectory for modulated proteins. To date, a comprehensive characterization of the longitudinal salivary proteome in pregnancy has not been performed and it is our immediate interest. In the discovery phase, maternal saliva (N = 20) at 6–13, 18–21, and 26–29 weeks of gestation was analyzed using level-free proteomics (SWATH-MS) approach. The expression levels of 65 proteins were found to change significantly with gestational age and distributed into two distinct clusters with a unique expression trajectory. The results revealed that altered proteins are involved in maternal immune modulation, metabolism, and host defense mechanism. Further, verification of 12 proteins was employed using targeted mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) in a separate subset of saliva (N = 14). The MRM results of 12 selected proteins confirmed a similar expression pattern as in SWATH-MS analysis. Overall, the results not only demonstrate the longitudinal maternal saliva proteome for the first time but also set the groundwork for comparative analysis between term birth and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

17 December 2021 in Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAbhishek Singh
Abhishek Singh
YSYudhyavirSingh Singh
YudhyavirSingh Singh
Introduction: Air leak consisting of pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema has been described as one of the complications of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection affecting disease course and outcome. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of published literature to highlight the risk factors, types, and outcomes in COVID-19. Method: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed from November 1, 2019, to February 28, 2021. Seventy-one studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 136 adult patients were included in the final analysis. Results: Majority of patients were male (75.2%) with the mean age of 58 years. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity followed by diabetes mellitus. Moreover, 12.5% of patients had a history of smoking while 11.7% had preexisting lung disease. Isolated pneumothorax (48.5%) was the most common and 17.65% had developed spontaneous pneumothorax. Mean onset time was 11.6 days and 67% of patients required an intercostal drainage tube for management. Mortality was 40%, and elderly, female gender, obese and hypertensive were at higher risk. Conclusion: COVID-19 related air leaks are associated with higher mortality and longer hospital stay and can occur even without positive pressure ventilation. History of smoking and preexisting lung disease has not been shown to increase the incidence of air leak. A well-designed study is required for a better understanding of COVID-19 related air leak.

13 August 2025 in Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABAnjishnujit Bandyopadhyay
Anjishnujit Bandyopadhyay
PHPartha Haldar
Partha Haldar
CSChhavi Sawhney
Chhavi Sawhney
ASAbhishek Singh
Abhishek Singh
Objective: Etomidate and ketamine are hemodynamically stable induction agents for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) of critically ill patients. Despite their relative stability in terms of hemodynamics, how the choice of agent affects mortality and the success of the procedure is debatable and has not yet been explored via systematic review and meta-analysis. The objective of this systematic review is to compare the efficacy of ketamine and etomidate for RSI in terms of mortality, hemodynamic parameters, and success rate.Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science was conducted from the starting date of each database until April 2024. Randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of ketamine and etomidate as induction drugs for critically ill patients undergoing RSI were included. The primary outcome was the risk of 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included the success rate and postinduction hypotension. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis.Results: Four studies with 1,663 patients were meta-analyzed, and no statistically significant difference between the two drugs was found for 28-day mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72–1.25; heterogeneity I2=39%; level of certainty of evidence per GRADE, moderate), first-pass success rate (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97–1.03), or postinduction cardiac arrest (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.62–1.96). Postinduction hypotension was higher in the ketamine group (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.03–1.64), but the result was not statistically significant.Conclusion: Mortality outcomes did not differ when ketamine or etomidate was used for RSI in critically ill patients. Ketamine, however, was associated with a non-significantly higher risk of postinduction hypotension.

2 March 2021 in Current Anesthesiology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAbhishek Singh
Abhishek Singh
PKPuneet Khanna
Puneet Khanna
SSSoumya Sarkar
Soumya Sarkar

1 January 2021 in Journal of Medical Ultrasound
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SYSangam Yadav
Sangam Yadav
ASAbhishek Singh
Abhishek Singh
KMKalung Manisha
Kalung Manisha
PKPuneet Khanna
Puneet Khanna
After the detection of novel coronavirus (2019) as the cause of a cluster of pneumonia in Wuhan, China, at the end of 2019, more than 10 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been reported around the globe. In the COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU), the use of stethoscope is minimal for obvious reasons. Shifting of COVID-19 patients out of ICU setup increases the risk of transmission of infection to health-care workers as well as jeopardizes the safety of patients. Hence, diagnostic imaging has emerged as a fundamental component of the current management of COVID-19. Lung ultrasound (LUS) imaging has become a safe bedside imaging alternative that does not expose the patient to radiation and minimizes the risk of contamination. Ultrasound (USG) can be used to scan almost all vital organs (heart, kidney, vascular, brain, etc.) and also help in rapid decision-making regarding the management of COVID-19 patients. In this note, we review the current state of the art of LUS in evaluating pulmonary changes induced by COVID-19. The goal is to identify characteristic sonographic findings most suited for the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia infections as well as to assess the impact of infection on other organs and utilizing the same in the management of COVID patients without compromising on the safety of patient or health-care provider.

1 August 2020 in Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAbhishek Singh
Abhishek Singh