Introduction: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has become a standard assessment tool in undergraduate medical school training. It is considered an objective assessment of practical skill of students. OSCE is a resource demanding assessment method that can have numerous challenges. Comprehensive assessment of perception regarding OSCE can help identify areas that need improvement. The aim of this study was to assess the perception of students and examiners towards OSCE. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on students and examiners undertaking OSCE from May 1 to July 30, 2021, using a structured questionnaire. Comparison of variables was done using Mann–Whitney U-Test and Chi-square test. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 141 students and 39 examiners participated in the study. The majority of the students and examiners had a positive response regarding the attributes, structure, organization and validity of OSCE. It was recommended to be used in future exams compared to other assessments by 38.3% of students and 51.3% of examiners. There were certain challenges reported by students and included stressfulness of the exam (51.1%), inadequate time (27.6%), and unsatisfactory orientation (30.5%). One-third of examiners considered it stressful, while 20.5% considered the time provided to be inadequate. Equipment to conduct the exam was considered inadequate by 39.1% and 56.4% of students and examiners, respectively. Around 80.1% of students recommended mock sessions and 23.1% of examiners did not have any prior training on OSCE. Conclusion: An overall positive perception of OSCE by students and examiners was seen. Certain challenges that need improvements were identified. Continuing evaluation and refinement of OSCE by departments is needed. We recommend further wide-scale national evaluation of the OSCE examination system of medical students.

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) pose a significant global health challenge, constituting over 80% of mortality and morbidity. This burden is particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Ethiopia. Despite this, there’s limited research on this issue in Africa. This study aims to investigate the prevalence, patterns, and outcomes of NCDs in hospitalized populations across three tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia. A hospital-based cohort study (August 2022 - January 2023) included patients aged 14 and older diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, or cancer at three Ethiopian hospitals. Data on demographics, socio-economic factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were collected through medical records and interviews. Logistic regression identified factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality, with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. In the study across three tertiary hospitals involving 2,237 patients, we uncovered the impact of NCDs. About 23.4% of patients struggled with NCDs, with cardiovascular diseases (53.3%), cancer (29.6%), diabetes (6.1%), and respiratory diseases (6.5%) being the most prevalent. Notably, among those affected, women comprised a slight majority (55.1%), with the average patient age being 47.2 years. Unfortunately, 15.3% of patients with NCDs faced in-hospital mortality. Our analysis revealed predictors of mortality, including cancer diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]:1.6, 95% CI: 1.2–1.8, p = 0.01), medication adherence ( AOR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.21–0.64, p < 0.001), concurrent infections (AOR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.16–0.86, p < 0.001), chronic kidney diseases (CKD) (AOR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14–0.85, p = 0.02), and complications during hospitalization (AOR: 6.36, 95% CI: 3.45–11.71, p < 0.001). Our study reveals a substantial prevalence of NCDs among hospitalized patients, affecting approximately one in four individuals, primarily with CVDs and cancer. Alarmingly, a significant proportion of these patients did not survive their hospitalization, emphasizing the urgent need for targeted interventions to enhance outcomes in this population.

Background: Anti-retroviral treatment has improved mortality of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients, which is offset by an increasing burden of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Data regarding prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in HIV infected patients in Ethiopia are very scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of CVD risks and associated factors in patients with HIV. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 333 patients with HIV infection, using a modified World Health Organization’s stepwise approach to surveillance questionnaire. Anthropometric and blood pressure measurement was done along with biochemical studies. Cardiovascular risk was estimated using Framingham risk score. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between cardiovascular risks and associated factors, with a p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the participants was 45 years, and 69.2% were females. Most (80.9%) of the participants had viral load below 50 copies/mL and the mean CD4 count was 579 cells/mm³. Dyslipidemia was the most common risk factor identified in 69.4%, followed by abnormal fasting blood glucose (≥ 100 mg/dL) in 36.8%. Hypertension was diagnosed in 23.8%, while 22.8% and 11.1% had metabolic syndrome and obesity, respectively. Framingham risk score was low in 95.9%. Male gender, increasing age, high body mass index and previous ART regimen being tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine and nevirapine increased CVD risk factors. Conclusion: Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were high in the population studied. There is a need to raise awareness about the risk factors, and patients should have timely follow-up and care.

BACKGROUND፡ Discussing potentially bad outcomes is a standard communication task in clinical care. Physicians’ awareness on ways to communicate bad news is considered low. SPIKES protocol is the most popular strategy used by physicians, but its practice and patients' perception are not known. This study attempted to fill the knowledge gap on protocol implementation, patient preference and physician effects.METHODS: Hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at SPHMMC from May 1 to June 30 using structured interviews administered to patients and physicians. Three hundred and sixty patients and 111 physicians were included. Assessment of SPIKES performance, patient satisfaction, patient preference, and physician awareness, attitude and effects were studied.RESULTS: Performance of SPIKES protocol was setting (74.5%), perception (51.1%), invitation (56.3%), knowledge (15.9%), emotion (22.3%) and summary (10.1%). Only 30.6% of the patients were entirely satisfied with the interaction, and 19.2% with knowledge attained. Patient satisfaction was associated with physician asking how much information they like (P=0.025). Patient desire and report showed variation. Eighty-two percent of the physicians were not aware of the protocol, and 83.8% had no training. Half of the physicians feel depressed after disclosure.CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction with communication process and knowledge is poor, as is performance of SPIKES components. Satisfaction is related to being asked how much patients want to know. Patients’ desires on how to be told news is different from how it is done. Breaking bad news increases feeling of depression. Awareness and training on the protocol are deficient; medical schools should incorporate it into their studies and implement proper follow-up.

Background: Gastrointestinal disease is a significant global health problem. Symptoms related to digestive system diseases negatively affect quality of life and impose a significant economic impact. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms are common in the Ethiopian population, and the associated pathologies are diverse. Real-time endoscopic visualization of the upper gastrointestinal tract is crucial for diagnosis. However, local data on the indications for endoscopic evaluation and the common underlying pathologies are limited. This study aimed to assess the common indications and upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings of patients presenting to Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing the complete records of patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation between January 2012 and December 2019. A structured checklist was used to screen records for completeness. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 25. Chi-square test was used to compare variables, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Results: A total of 5753 patients underwent complete upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic evaluation during the study period. The median age of the patients was 37 years. Males accounted for 63.4% of the patients. Dyspepsia (27.8%) was the most common indication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation, followed by upper gastrointestinal bleeding (17.1%), and screening for varices (16.8%). Esophageal varices (35.8%), gastritis (18.1%), and duodenal ulcers (10.6%) were the most common pathologies found on esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, respectively. Common upper gastrointestinal pathologies are predominant among males and patients in their third decade of life. Conclusion: Dyspepsia was the most common indication for endoscopic evaluation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Esophageal varices were the most common pathological finding, followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastritis, portal hypertensive gastropathy, duodenal ulcer, and hiatal hernia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy remains a vital tool for the diagnosis of pathologies of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Introduction: The learning environment is an important determinant of the quality of medical education. Having a good learning climate leads to improved learning process, satisfaction with education, and helps achieve the goals of the curriculum. Assessment of the quality of learning environment helps with the identification of areas that need improvement. The aim of this study was to assess the learning environment of internal medicine training program in Ethiopia. Methods: A mixed methods study using a cross-sectional survey using Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure and a qualitative study using a focus group discussion was done on internal medicine residents from December 2020 to May 2021. Comparison of quantitative data was done using Mann–Whitney U-Test and Kruskal–Wallis H-test. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 100 residents participated in the study. The overall total mean score of the responses of the participants was 70.87 (± 19.8) with mean perceptions of role autonomy, perceptions of teaching and perceptions of social support of 25.9 (± 7.1), 27.1 (10.2) and 17.9 (± 5.1), respectively. These values suggest the presence of plenty of problems in the program. Higher mean scores were reported by males and by earlier years of residency. Ten residents participated in the focus group discussion. Four recurring themes that negatively affect learning environment were identified and included excessive workload, inadequate teaching activity, non-conducive hospital physical environment and lack of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Conclusion: The internal medicine residency learning environment has many challenges that need immediate attention and follow-up.