The Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry satellite instrument has been measuring the mesospheric global temperature since February 2002, providing the longest continuous data set to statistically study the climatology and anomaly of the quasi‐two‐day waves (QTDWs), including the westward zonal wave number 2 (W2), 3 (W3), and 4 (W4) modes. It is found that the W2 QTDW generally peaks earliest, followed by the W3 mode with the W4 QTDW being amplified lastly. This temporal pattern is always disordered during the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) periods. The temperature oscillations of the QTDW usually peak at nearly the same period at different altitudes and different latitudes for a certain case but would be different from year to year. The statistical results show that the periods of the W2 QTDWs are more frequently observed to be at 45–48 hr and the periods of the W3 mode are mostly confined between 45 and 52 hr. Nevertheless, the oscillations of the W4 QTDW peak more dispersedly between 41 and 56 hr. The W3 QTDW is usually the strongest among the three modes, whereas it is sometimes equal to or even weaker than W2 and W4 QTDWs, especially during SSW periods. Besides, we found that the vertical distribution of the W3 QTDW splits into a bimodal structure during the SSW periods of 2006 and 2011. And the solar cycle trend of the QTDWs is frequently disturbed by a 2‐ to 5‐year variability, which seems to be a common feature for all the QTDW modes.

The westward quasi‐6‐day wave (Q6DW) with zonal wavenumber 1 is a prominent and recurrent phenomenon in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) and has a significant impact on day‐to‐day ionospheric variability. Geopotential height measurements from Aura Microwave Limb Sounder and Specified Dynamics Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model eXtended Version simulations during 2005–2019 are utilized to study the climatological variations of Q6DW. The spectral analysis clearly indicates that four typical Q6DW events occur in the MLT region before and after the two equinoxes in 1 year. The wave amplitudes in the summer hemisphere are considerably larger than the amplitudes in the winter hemisphere. The Eliassen‐Palm flux diagnostics show that the wave source of the post‐September equinox event is located in both hemispheres, while the sources of the other three Q6DW events are in the winter hemisphere. The diagnostic analysis results show that the climatological features of Q6DW are primarily due to the seasonal variations of the mean flow, which can determine the Q6DW critical layers, baroclinic/barotropic instability, and waveguides. Specifically, the Q6DW can be amplified in the summer hemisphere mesosphere at high latitudes during pre‐ and postequinox periods when the critical layers penetrate the unstable region. At the two equinoxes, the Q6DW can also propagate into the MLT region with similar amplitudes in both hemispheres due to the weak zonal mean flow but without additional amplification. At the two solstices, the Q6DW is suppressed because the critical layers envelop the whole unstable region, which prevents its amplification through wave‐mean flow interaction.

In this study, the effects of the Madden‐Julian oscillation (MJO) on the northern stratosphere during boreal winter are investigated, especially in cases with the absence of a stratospheric sudden warming (SSW) event. During the wintertime, the polar cap temperature is expected to increase following MJO phase 2 (P2), P3, P4, and P7. However, the responses after P2 and P3 are much weaker if the dates from 50 days before to 50 days after the SSW central days are excluded from the composite. This result implies that the stratospheric polar warming following MJO P2 and P3 is sensitive to the occurrence of SSWs. After excluding the SSW events from the composite, the subsequent temperature anomalies strengthen and become more significant approximately 30 days after MJO P4 and 10 days after MJO P7. Planetary wave (PW) anomalies are enhanced in the midlatitudes of the upper troposphere, lagging MJO P4 by 15–25 days and lagging MJO P7 by 5–15 days. Thus, the upward propagation and dissipation of PWs in the stratosphere are significantly enhanced, further strengthening the Brewer‐Dobson circulation in the Northern Hemisphere stratosphere. The WN1, which is induced by the MJO in the stratosphere, is the dominant component of PW perturbation. The enhanced PW dissipation in the high latitudes of the stratosphere is weaker in terms of lagging MJO P4, so the zonal wind and temperature anomalies after MJO P4 are less significant in the polar region, especially in the lower stratosphere.

Using the Modern‐Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 reanalysis and Aura Microwave Limb Sounder geopotential height and temperature observations, two unusual planetary waves (PWs) with westward zonal wavenumber 1 (W1) and periods of ∼6.0 and ∼9.6 days are identified during a rare Antarctic sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) event in September 2019, which follow a strong W1 PW with period of ∼7.4 days. It is found that the W1 ∼7.4‐day wave is actually the representation of the climatological W1 quasi‐6‐day wave before the September equinox, which peaks on September 10, 2019. Meanwhile, a strong zonally symmetric wave with period of ∼32.2 days occurs in the Southern Hemisphere with a maximum zonal wind amplitude of ∼27 m/s at 65°S and 48 km. Interestingly, the frequencies and zonal wavenumbers of the W1 ∼7.4‐day, ∼6.0‐day, ∼9.6‐day and zonally symmetric ∼32.2‐day waves exactly satisfy the nonlinear interaction theory between PWs. We thus proposed for the first time the occurrence of nonlinear interaction between a W1 ∼7.4‐day wave and a zonally symmetric ∼32.2‐day wave, which generates two W1 PWs with periods of ∼6.0 and ∼9.6 days. The Eliassen‐Palm flux diagnostics suggest that the zonally symmetric ∼32.2‐day wave also contributes to the wind deceleration during this SSW. Moreover, the baroclinic/barotropic instabilities related to the vertical shear in the zonal wind during the SSW considerably enhance the PW activities in the Antarctic stratosphere. The climatological variations of the instabilities and critical layers in the mesosphere can also influence the propagation of these three W1 PWs.

Multiyear high‐frequency gravity wave (GW) momentum fluxes and variances in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere region are revealed using four meteor radars along 120°E longitude at Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes for the first time, which are located at Mohe (53.5°N, 122.3°E), Beijing (40.3°N, 116.2°E), Mengcheng (33.3°N, 116.5°E), and Wuhan (30.5°N, 114.2°E), respectively. The seasonal and latitudinal variations of GW momentum fluxes in the midlatitude are discussed. The directions of the monthly mean zonal momentum fluxes are mostly against the background mean zonal winds, which agree well with the selective filtering mechanism. The seasonal variations of meridional momentum fluxes have similar trends over all four stations. The latitudinal variations in the seasonal variation of GW momentum fluxes are mainly due to the latitudinal variations of background winds and GW sources. The unexpected eastward momentum fluxes in winter over Beijing are likely caused by the secondary GWs propagating eastward from the source region over the Tibetan Plateau (25°–40°N, 70–100°E). The GW variances show a V‐shaped structure indicating annual and semiannual variations over four stations in zonal component. A quasi‐4‐month oscillation was observed over Mohe, Mengcheng, and Wuhan in meridional component. The background winds play decisive roles in these GW variance structures.

Combined Thermosphere‐Ionosphere‐Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED)/TIMED Doppler interferometer horizontal winds, Global Positioning System Total Electron Content maps, and Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate electron density profiles are utilized to study the westward zonal wavenumber 1 quasi‐6‐day planetary wave in both the neutral atmosphere and F region ionosphere under solar minimum conditions in 2009. It is found that the zonal (meridional) wind perturbations maximize (minimize) in the geographic equatorial mesosphere and lower thermosphere region and are in phase (out of phase) between hemispheres, which agrees well with both the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite/high‐resolution Doppler imager wind observations and (1, 1) Rossby normal mode. Analysis of the Total Electron Content maps and Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate electron density profiles shows that the F region ionosphere exhibits wave spectra and temporal variations that are consistent with those of the neutral atmosphere. Specifically, the 6‐day oscillation in electron density is the highest during 1200–1800 LT in the equatorial ionospheric anomaly region (~20° geomagnetic latitude), with a minimum amplitude at the equator, which agrees well with the F region fountain effect. At 300 km, the amplitude of the electron density oscillation reaches ~1.2 × 10 ⁴ cm ⁻³ , which accounts for ~14% of the background value. In addition, the F ₂ layer electron peak density and peak height also exhibit corresponding oscillations with amplitudes of ~9 × 10 ⁴ cm ⁻³ and ~12 km, respectively. The current work provides clear evidence for F region ionospheric responses to planetary waves in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere region.