To ascertain the role of patient age as an influencing factor in the pharmacokinetics of anagrelide and to clarify whether different dosing is required in young (18 - 50 years) vs. elderly (≥ 65 years) patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET). This Phase II, multicenter, open-label study compared the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of anagrelide and its active metabolite, 3-hydroxy-anagrelide, in young and elderly patients with ET. Three days prior to pharmacokinetic assessment, patients divided their normal daily anagrelide into a structured twice-daily dosing (BID) schedule. Serial blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis over a 12-h dosing interval. Anagrelide and 3-hydroxy-anagrelide plasma concentrations were normalized to a common dose (1 mg BID) to control for dosing differences between patients. Patients were monitored routinely for adverse events (AEs) and vital signs. A total of 24 patients (12 young; 12 elderly) completed the study. The dose-normalized anagrelide maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve over one dosing interval (AUCτ), were higher in elderly patients compared with young patients (Cmax: 3.63 vs. 2.66 ng/ml; p = 0.09, AUCτ: 10.3 vs. 6.4 ng×h/ml; p = 0.01). In contrast, the dose-normalized 3-hydroxy-anagrelide Cmax and AUCτ were lower in the elderly patients when compared with young patients (Cmax: 4.19 vs. 7.26 ng/ml; p = 0.02, AUCτ: 17.4 vs. 27.6 ng×h/ml; p = 0.03). No significant difference was observed in the geometric mean terminal half-life (t1/2) of anagrelide in elderly and young patients (1.4 vs. 1.3 h, respectively; p = 0.38), whereas the geometric mean t1/2 of 3-hydroxy-anagrelide was significantly longer in the elderly patients compared with the young patients (3.5 vs. 2.7 h, respectively; p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in platelet count or vital signs between the age groups. Anagrelide was well tolerated; there were no serious AEs or AEs that led to withdrawal from the study. To conclude, the differences observed in anagrelide and 3-hydroxy-anagrelide pharmacokinetics do not justify using a different dosing regimen in young vs. elderly patients with ET.

(1) Background: the use of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSC) in emerging therapies for spinal cord injury (SCI) hold the potential to improve functional recovery. However, the development of cell-based medicines is challenging and preclinical studies addressing quality, safety and efficacy must be conducted prior to clinical testing; (2) Methods: herein we present (i) the characterization of the quality attributes of MSC from the Wharton’s jelly (WJ) of the umbilical cord, (ii) safety of intrathecal infusion in a 3-month subchronic toxicity assessment study, and (iii) efficacy in a rat SCI model by controlled impaction (100 kdynes) after single (day 7 post-injury) and repeated dose of 1 × 10⁶ MSC,WJ (days 7 and 14 post-injury) with 70-day monitoring by electrophysiological testing, motor function assessment and histology evaluation; (3) Results: no toxicity associated to MSC,WJ infusion was observed. Regarding efficacy, recovery of locomotion was promoted at early time points. Persistence of MSC,WJ was detected early after administration (day 2 post-injection) but not at days 14 and 63 post-injection. (4) Conclusions: the safety profile and signs of efficacy substantiate the suitability of the presented data for inclusion in the Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier for further consideration by the competent Regulatory Authority to proceed with clinical trials.

Atrophic pseudoarthrosis is a serious complication with an incidence of 5-10 % of bone fractures located in the diaphysis of long bones. Standard treatments involve aggressive surgical procedures and re-interventions requiring the use of autografts from the iliac crest as a source of bone-forming biological activity (Standard of Care, SoC). In this context, regenerative ex vivo expanded osteogenic cell-based medicines could be of interest. Particularly, Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSC) offer new prospects to promote bone tissue repair in pseudoarthrosis by providing biological activity in an osteoconductive and osteoinductive environment. We conducted a phase IIa, prospective, randomised, parallel, two-arms, open-label with blinded assessor pilot clinical trial to compare SoC vs. a tissue-engineered product (TEP), composed of autologous bone marrow (BM)-derived MSCs loaded onto allogeneic decellularised, lyophilised spongy bone cubes, in a cohort of 20 patients with non-hypertrophic pseudoarthrosis of long bones. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Radiological bone healing was evaluated by standard X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scanning. Quality of life was measured using the EUROQOL-5D questionnaire. Ten patients were randomized to TEP and 10 to SoC with iliac crest autograft. Manufacturing of TEP was feasible and reproducibly achieved. TEP implantation in the bone defect was successful in all cases and none of the 36 adverse events (AE) reported were related to the treatment. Efficacy analyses were performed in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) population, which included 17 patients after 3 patients withdrew from the study. The degree of consolidation, estimated by measuring Hounsfield units (HU) on CT, showed no significant differences between the two treatment groups at 12 months post treatment (main efficacy variable) (p = 0.4835) or at 6 months. Although only a small number of patients were included in our study, it is notable that no significant differences were observed between the experimental treatment and SoC, thus suggesting TEP as an alternative where autograft is not available or contraindicated.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) were rapidly proposed as a therapeutic option for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) based on their immunomodulatory properties. We report the results of COVIDMES, a multicenter trial initiated within a public blood and tissue bank infrastructure during unprecedented period of volatility and scientific uncertainty of the first pandemic waves. To evaluate the safety, feasibility and exploratory efficacy of Wharton's Jelly-derived MSCs (WJ-MSCs) in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 associated ARDS. This was a multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase I/II pilot trial. The primary endpoint was all-cause 28-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and longitudinal inflammatory biomarker kinetics. Twenty-six patients were enrolled between July 15th, 2020, and June 30th, 2021, of whom 25 received two intravenous doses of either 1 × 10⁶ viable WJ-MSCs/kg (n = 13) or placebo (n = 12) on days 1 and 3. WJ-MSC administration was safe and well tolerated, with no treatment-related serious adverse events. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in 28-day mortality (no deaths in the treatment group versus 2 in the placebo group, P = 0.18), duration of mechanical ventilation (18.3 versus 10.6 days; P = 0.08), or ICU stay (17.1 versus 11.9 days; P = 0.11). Ferritin levels showed a significantly different temporal evolution, with more pronounced reduction over time in the WJ-MSC group (P < 0.0001 from baseline; P = 0.0057 for group-time interactions), however this biological effect was not associated with clinical improvement. In this exploratory pilot study, WJ-MSCs demonstrated a favorable safety profile and evidence of biochemical immunomodulation but no clinical efficacy in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 associated ARDS. These findings highlight the challenges of evaluating advanced therapy medicinal products within a rapidly evolving standard of care and support the need for biomarker-guided patient stratification and optimized dosing strategies in future MSC trials. The successful execution of this trial also validates the resilience of academic "donor-to-patient" networks in global health emergencies.