Santiago A Lozano-Calderón

Dr. Santiago A Lozano-Calderón

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 March 2022 in Skeletal Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CCConnie Y Chang
Connie Y Chang
HGHillary W. Garner
Hillary W. Garner
SAShivani Ahlawat
Shivani Ahlawat
BABehrang Amini
Behrang Amini
MBMatthew D. Bucknor
Matthew D. Bucknor
JWJim S. Wu
Jim S. Wu
The purpose of this article is to present algorithms for the diagnostic management of solitary bone lesions incidentally encountered on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MRI) in adults. Based on review of the current literature and expert opinion, the Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards Committee of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) proposes a bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) for incidentally encountered solitary bone lesions on CT and MRI with four possible diagnostic management recommendations (Bone-RADS1, leave alone; Bone-RADS2, perform different imaging modality; Bone-RADS3, perform follow-up imaging; Bone-RADS4, biopsy and/or oncologic referral). Two algorithms for CT based on lesion density (lucent or sclerotic/mixed) and two for MRI allow the user to arrive at a specific Bone-RADS management recommendation. Representative cases are provided to illustrate the usability of the algorithms.

30 November 2021 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OGOlivier Q. Groot
Olivier Q. Groot
ALAmanda Lans
Amanda Lans
PTPeter K. Twining
Peter K. Twining
MBMichiel Bongers
Michiel Bongers
NKNeal Kapoor
Neal Kapoor
JSJoseph H. Schwab
Joseph H. Schwab
Background: The outcome differences following surgery for an impending versus a completed pathological fracture have not been clearly defined. The purpose of the present study was to assess differences in outcomes following the surgical treatment of impending versus completed pathological fractures in patients with long-bone metastases in terms of (1) 90-day and 1-year survival and (2) intraoperative blood loss, perioperative blood transfusion, anesthesia time, duration of hospitalization, 30-day postoperative systemic complications, and reoperations. Methods: We retrospectively performed a matched cohort study utilizing a database of 1,064 patients who had undergone operative treatment for 462 impending and 602 completed metastatic long-bone fractures. After matching on 22 variables, including primary tumor, visceral metastases, and surgical treatment, 270 impending pathological fractures were matched to 270 completed pathological fractures. The primary outcome was assessed with the Cox proportional hazard model. The secondary outcomes were assessed with the McNemar test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The 90-day survival rate did not differ between the groups (HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.56]; p = 0.48), but the 1-year survival rate was worse for completed pathological fractures (46% versus 38%) (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.61]; p = 0.03). With regard to secondary outcomes, completed pathological fractures were associated with higher intraoperative estimated blood loss (p = 0.03), a higher rate of perioperative blood transfusions (p = 0.01), longer anesthesia time (p = 0.04), and more reoperations (OR, 2.50 [95% CI, 1.92 to 7.86]; p = 0.03); no differences were found in terms of the rate of 30-day postoperative complications or the duration of hospitalization. Conclusions: Patients undergoing surgery for impending pathological fractures had lower 1-year mortality rates and better secondary outcomes as compared with patients undergoing surgery for completed pathological fractures when accounting for 22 covariates through propensity matching. Patients with an impending pathological fracture appear to benefit from prophylactic stabilization as stabilizing a completed pathological fracture seems to be associated with increased mortality, blood loss, rate of blood transfusions, duration of surgery, and reoperation risk. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

1 October 2015 in Orthopedic Clinics of North America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMamun Al-Rashid
Mamun Al-Rashid
DRDipak B. Ramkumar
Dipak B. Ramkumar
KRKevin Raskin
Kevin Raskin
JSJoseph Schwab
Joseph Schwab
FHFrancis J. Hornicek
Francis J. Hornicek
SLSantiago A Lozano-Calderón
Santiago A Lozano-Calderón

24 August 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CYCaleb Matthew Yeung
Caleb Matthew Yeung
ABAbhiram Bhashyam
Abhiram Bhashyam
SPShalin S. Patel
Shalin S. Patel
EOEDUARDO ORTIZ-CRUZ
EDUARDO ORTIZ-CRUZ
SLSantiago A Lozano-Calderón
Santiago A Lozano-Calderón
Carbon fiber offers numerous material benefits including reduced wear, high strength-to-weight ratio, a similar elastic modulus to that of bone, and high biocompatibility. Carbon fiber implants are increasingly used in multiple arenas within orthopaedic surgery, including spine, trauma, arthroplasty, and oncology. In the orthopaedic oncologic population, the radiolucency of carbon fiber facilitates post-operative imaging for tumor surveillance or recurrence, the monitoring of bony healing and union, and radiation mapping and delivery.

1 January 2019 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKCourtney L. Kaiser
Courtney L. Kaiser
CYCaleb M. Yeung
Caleb M. Yeung
KRKevin A. Raskin
Kevin A. Raskin
SLSantiago A Lozano-Calderón
Santiago A Lozano-Calderón

10 May 2023 in The Journal of Arthroplasty
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMarcos R. Gonzalez
Marcos R. Gonzalez
ABAngad D.S. Bedi
Angad D.S. Bedi
DKDaniel Karczewski
Daniel Karczewski
SLSantiago A Lozano-Calderón
Santiago A Lozano-Calderón