Linda Schuler

Dr. Linda Schuler


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 January 2017 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCraig E. Barcus
Craig E. Barcus
KOKathleen A. O’lEary
Kathleen A. O’lEary
JBJennifer L. Brockman
Jennifer L. Brockman
DRDebra E. Rugowski
Debra E. Rugowski
YLYuming Liu
Yuming Liu
LSLinda Schuler
Linda Schuler
The development and progression of estrogen receptor alpha positive (ERα+) breast cancer has been linked epidemiologically to prolactin. However, activation of the canonical mediator of prolactin, STAT5, is associated with more differentiated cancers and better prognoses. We have reported that density/stiffness of the extracellular matrix potently modulates the repertoire of prolactin signals in human ERα + breast cancer cells in vitro: stiff matrices shift the balance from the Janus kinase (JAK)2/STAT5 cascade toward pro-tumor progressive extracellular regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 signals, driving invasion. However, the consequences for behavior of ERα + cancers in vivo are not known. In order to investigate the importance of matrix density/stiffness in progression of ERα + cancers, we examined tumor development and progression following orthotopic transplantation of two clonal green fluorescent protein (GFP) + ERα + tumor cell lines derived from prolactin-induced tumors to 8-week-old wild-type FVB/N (WT) or collagen-dense (col1a1 tm1Jae/+ ) female mice. The latter express a mutant non-cleavable allele of collagen 1a1 “knocked-in” to the col1a1 gene locus, permitting COL1A1 accumulation. We evaluated the effect of the collagen environment on tumor progression by examining circulating tumor cells and lung metastases, activated signaling pathways by immunohistochemistry analysis and immunoblotting, and collagen structure by second harmonic generation microscopy. ERα + primary tumors did not differ in growth rate, histologic type, ERα, or prolactin receptor (PRLR) expression between col1a1 tm1Jae/+ and WT recipients. However, the col1a1 tm1Jae/+ environment significantly increased circulating tumor cells and the number and size of lung metastases at end stage. Tumors in col1a1 tm1Jae/+ recipients displayed reduced STAT5 activation, and higher phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and AKT. Moreover, intratumoral collagen fibers in col1a1 tm1Jae/+ recipients were aligned with tumor projections into the adjacent fat pad, perpendicular to the bulk of the tumor, in contrast to the collagen fibers wrapped around the more uniformly expansive tumors in WT recipients. A collagen-dense extracellular matrix can potently interact with hormonal signals to drive metastasis of ERα + breast cancers.

1 October 2018 in Cancer Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMichael P. Shea
Michael P. Shea
KOKathleen A. O'LEary
Kathleen A. O'LEary
KWKyle A. Wegner
Kyle A. Wegner
CVChad M. Vezina
Chad M. Vezina
LSLinda Schuler
Linda Schuler

12 August 2019 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FJFatou Jallow
Fatou Jallow
KOKathleen A. O’leary
Kathleen A. O’leary
DRDebra E. Rugowski
Debra E. Rugowski
JGJorge F. Guerrero
Jorge F. Guerrero
SPSuzanne Ponik
Suzanne Ponik
LSLinda Schuler
Linda Schuler

16 June 2022 in Frontiers in Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LSLinda Schuler
Linda Schuler
KOKathleen A. O’lEary
Kathleen A. O’lEary
Prolactin coordinates with the ovarian steroids to orchestrate mammary development and lactation, culminating in nourishment and an increasingly appreciated array of other benefits for neonates. Its central activities in mammary epithelial growth and differentiation suggest that it plays a role(s) in breast cancer, but it has been challenging to identify its contributions, essential for incorporation into prevention and treatment approaches. Large prospective epidemiologic studies have linked higher prolactin exposure to increased risk, particularly for ER+ breast cancer in postmenopausal women. However, it has been more difficult to determine its actions and clinical consequences in established tumors. Here we review experimental data implicating multiple mechanisms by which prolactin may increase the risk of breast cancer. We then consider the evidence for role(s) of prolactin and its downstream signaling cascades in disease progression and treatment responses, and discuss how new approaches are beginning to illuminate the biology behind the seemingly conflicting epidemiologic and experimental studies of prolactin actions across diverse breast cancers.

1 August 2019 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KCKatie M. Campbell
Katie M. Campbell
KOKathleen A. O’lEary
Kathleen A. O’lEary
DRDebra E. Rugowski
Debra E. Rugowski
WMWilliam A. Mulligan
William A. Mulligan
EBErica K. Barnell
Erica K. Barnell
OGObi L. Griffith
Obi L. Griffith
The NRL-PRL murine model, defined by mammary-selective transgenic rat prolactin ligand rPrl expression, establishes spontaneous ER+ mammary tumors in nulliparous females, mimicking the association between elevated prolactin (PRL) and risk for development of ER+ breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Whole-genome and exome sequencing in a discovery cohort (n = 5) of end-stage tumors revealed canonical activating mutations and copy number amplifications of Kras. The frequent mutations in this pathway were validated in an extension cohort, identifying activating Ras alterations in 79% of tumors (23 of 29). Transcriptome analyses over the course of oncogenesis revealed marked alterations associated with Ras activity in established tumors compared with preneoplastic tissues; in cell-intrinsic processes associated with mitosis, cell adhesion, and invasion; as well as in the surrounding tumor environment. These genomic analyses suggest that PRL induces a selective bottleneck for spontaneous Ras-driven tumors that may model a subset of aggressive clinical ER+ breast cancers.

1 April 2018 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMichael P. Shea
Michael P. Shea
KOKathleen A. O'Leary
Kathleen A. O'Leary
SFSaja Fakhraldeen
Saja Fakhraldeen
VGVincent Goffin
Vincent Goffin
AFAndreas Friedl
Andreas Friedl
LSLinda Schuler
Linda Schuler
Although antiestrogen therapies are successful in many patients with estrogen receptor alpha-positive (ERα+) breast cancer, 25% to 40% fail to respond. Although multiple mechanisms underlie evasion of these treatments, including tumor heterogeneity and drug-resistant cancer stem cells (CSC), further investigations have been limited by the paucity of preclinical ERα+ tumor models. Here, we examined a mouse model of prolactin-induced aggressive ERα+ breast cancer, which mimics the epidemiologic link between prolactin exposure and increased risk for metastatic ERα+ tumors. Like a subset of ERα+ patient cancers, the prolactin-induced adenocarcinomas contained two major tumor subpopulations that expressed markers of normal luminal and basal epithelial cells. CSC activity was distributed equally across these two tumor subpopulations. Treatment with the selective estrogen receptor downregulator (SERD), ICI 182,780 (ICI), did not slow tumor growth, but induced adaptive responses in CSC activity, increased markers of plasticity including target gene reporters of Wnt/Notch signaling and epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and increased double-positive (K8/K5) cells. In primary tumorsphere cultures, ICI stimulated CSC self-renewal and was able to overcome the dependence of self-renewal upon Wnt or Notch signaling individually, but not together. Our findings demonstrate that treatment of aggressive mixed lineage ERα+ breast cancers with a SERD does not inhibit growth, but rather evokes tumor cell plasticity and regenerative CSC activity, predicting likely negative impacts on patient tumors with these characteristics. Significance: This study suggests that treatment of a subset of ERα+ breast cancers with antiestrogen therapies may not only fail to slow growth but also promote aggressive behavior by evoking tumor cell plasticity and regenerative CSC activity. Cancer Res; 78(7); 1672–84. ©2018 AACR.