Autophagy is a major self-degradative process through which cytoplasmic material, including damaged organelles and proteins, are delivered and degraded in the lysosome. Autophagy represents a dynamic recycling system that produces new building blocks and energy, essential for cellular renovation, physiology, and homeostasis. Principal autophagy triggers include starvation, pathogens, and stress. Autophagy plays also a pivotal role in immune response regulation, including immune cell differentiation, antigen presentation and the generation of T effector responses, the development of protective immunity against pathogens, and the coordination of immunometabolic signals. A plethora of studies propose that both impaired and overactive autophagic processes contribute to the pathogenesis of human disorders, including infections, cancer, atherosclerosis, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases. Autophagy has been also implicated in the development and progression of allergen-driven airway inflammation and remodeling. Here, we provide an overview of recent studies pertinent to the biology of autophagy and molecular pathways controlling its activation, we discuss autophagy-mediated beneficial and detrimental effects in animal models of allergic diseases and illuminate new advances on the role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of human asthma. We conclude contemplating the potential of targeting autophagy as a novel therapeutic approach for the management of allergic responses and linked asthmatic disease.

Asthma is a complex inflammatory airway disease affecting a significant global population, spanning from childhood through adulthood. Despite advances in treatment modalities, a significant subset of patients, approximately 10%, grapple with severe asthma, characterized by increased healthcare utilization and diminished quality of life. Tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), offers promising therapeutic potential. TSLP is a protein released by a variety of cells, with a predominance of epithelial cells, in reaction to plenty of stimuli, such examples as viruses, aeroallergens, and others. Its action is upstream and pertains to initiating numerous subsequent innate and adaptive immune reactions, contributing to the continuation of asthma pathophysiological processes. Tezepelumab’s unique efficacy spans diverse severe asthma phenotypes, significantly reducing exacerbation rates across eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic subtypes. Its favorable safety profile and clinically meaningful improvements in asthma control, accompanied by reductions in cytokine levels and baseline biomarkers, underscore its broad impact on asthma inflammation. Its efficacy, irrespective of type 2 (T2) endotype, reinforces the idea that TSLP blockade broadly inhibits pathways crucial to asthma pathophysiology, rather than narrowly focusing on individual downstream factors, as previous biological treatments have. This review discusses the rationale for TSLP blockade and the efficacy of tezepelumab in severe asthma using data from key trials.

Background: A substantial proportion of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive limited clinical benefit from immunotherapy. Monitoring of peripheral blood immune markers (PBIMs) may emerge as a useful tool to predict treatment outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Patients/Methods: We prospectively measured several PBIMs in a PD-L1 high (TPS ≥ 50%) NSCLC cohort of patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. Kinetics over the first year of treatment were assessed at baseline (T0) and at 21 days (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3) and at 1 year (T4) post-treatment initiation. Associations with clinical outcomes were explored after a 2-year follow-up period. Results: In total, 31 patients with PD-L1 high locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were prospectively enrolled. Over the first year of treatment, levels of CRP, IL-17α, IL-6, and IL-8 were significantly decreased. Early kinetics analysis showed significant decrease in total leukocytes, neutrophils, CRP, and MIP-3α/CCL20, as well as significant transient elevation of ITAC/CXCL11, IL-1β, IL-7, and TNFα, during the first 3 months of treatment. Early percent changes (Δ% at T1 and at T2) of ‘low’ vs. ‘high’ pretreatment levels showed significant differences for LDH, ITAC/CXCL11, GM-CSF, MIP-1α/CCL3, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, and sPD-L1. Longitudinal analysis, stratified per responders and for pre-progression fluctuations, did not reveal significant findings. Among markers with acceptable discriminative performance, higher baseline CRP, complement C4, and IL-6 levels were associated with poorer clinical outcomes. In multivariable analysis, only C4 retained independent prognostic significance; however, integration of these PBIMs into composite indices improved prognostic performance. Conclusions: In this prospective study, longitudinal monitoring of PBIMs provided descriptive insights into immune and inflammatory dynamics during pembrolizumab treatment; however, no significant associations were observed between in-treatment biomarker kinetics and clinical outcomes. In exploratory analyses, baseline CRP, complement C4, and IL-6 levels were associated with clinical outcomes, and their integration into composite indices improved prognostic performance. These findings suggest that specific baseline PBIMs may carry prognostic relevance, while the role of in-treatment monitoring remains to be further clarified in larger prospective studies.