Seong Kyu Park

Seong Kyu Park


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JYJeong-Ju Yoo
Jeong-Ju Yoo
HSHee Bong Shin
Hee Bong Shin
JSJu Sun Song
Ju Sun Song
MKMinjung Kim
Minjung Kim
JYJina Yun
Jina Yun
OGon the behalf of SMS (Soonchunhyang microbiome multi-disciplinary study group)
on the behalf of SMS (Soonchunhyang microbiome multi-disciplinary study group)
Traditionally, the diagnostic mainstay of recurrent urinary tract infection has been urinary culture. However, the causative uropathogen of recurrent cystitis has not been well established. Urine DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) can provide additional information on these infections. Herein, we compared urine NGS results and urine cultures in patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC) and recurrent cystitis (RC), and evaluated the difference in microbiome patterns in the NGS results. Patients who underwent urine culture and NGS due to AUC or RC were retrospectively reviewed. All urine samples were collected via a transurethral catheter and studied utilizing a type of NGS called 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplification and sequencing. The sensitivity of urine NGS was significantly higher than that of conventional urine culture (69.0% vs. 16.7%, p < 0.05). The detection rate of urine NGS was slightly lower in the RC group than in the AUC group (67.7% vs. 72.7%). Microbiome diversity was significantly higher in the RC group compared to the AUC group (p = 0.007), and the microbiome composition was significantly different between the AUC and RC groups. In the urine NGS results, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Enterobacteriaceae were found in the AUC group, and Sphingomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Rothia spp. were detected in the RC group. Urine NGS can significantly increase the diagnostic sensitivity compared to traditional urine culture methods, especially in RC patients. AUC and RC patients had significant differences in bacterial diversity and patterns. Therefore, recurrent cystitis might be approached from a different perspective.

24 November 2021 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSung Hee Lim
Sung Hee Lim
SCSeong-Hyeok Choi
Seong-Hyeok Choi
BKBora Kim
Bora Kim
JKJi-Youn Kim
Ji-Youn Kim
YJYoung-Sok Ji
Young-Sok Ji
SPSeong Kyu Park
Seong Kyu Park
The COVID-19 pandemic is changing rapidly and requires different strategies to maintain immunization. In Korea, different COVID-19 vaccines are recommended and available for various populations, including healthcare workers (HCWs) at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We plan to evaluate the adverse events (AEs) and immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccines in HCWs at a single center. This cohort study included HCWs fully vaccinated with either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. Blood samples were taken eight weeks after the second vaccination with both COVID-19 vaccines and six months after the second vaccination from participants with the BNT162b2 vaccine. The primary endpoint for immunogenicity was the serum neutralizing antibody responses eight weeks after vaccination. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of various AEs within 28 days of each vaccination. Between 16 March and 23 June 2021, 115 participants were enrolled (65 in the ChAdOx1 group and 50 in the BNT162b2 group). Significantly higher surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) inhibition was observed in participants vaccinated with two doses of BNT162b2 (mean (SD) 91.4 (9.68)%) than in those vaccinated with ChAdOx1 (mean (SD) 73.3 (22.57)%). The effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine was maintained across all age and gender categories. At six months after the second dose, serum antibody levels declined significantly in the BNT162b2 group. The main adverse events, including fever, myalgia, fatigue, and headache, were significantly higher in the ChAdOx1 group after the first dose, whereas, after the second dose, those AEs were significantly higher in the BNT162b2 group (p < 0.05). Two doses of either the ChAdOx1 or the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine resulted in very high seropositivity among the HCWs at our center. The quality of the antibody response, measured by sVNT inhibition, was significantly better with the BNT162b2 vaccine than with the ChAdOx1 vaccine. There was no significant association between neutralizing antibody response and AE after each vaccination in our cohort.

1 May 2020 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YJYoung sok Ji
Young sok Ji
SPSeong Kyu Park
Seong Kyu Park
Seongho RyuSeongho Ryu
Seongho Ryu
It has long been recognized that allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can reduce the risk of leukemia relapse by inducing the graft-versus-leukemia effect. However, allogeneic stem cell transplantation is also known to be able to cause graft-versus-host disease, which can cause considerable morbidity and even mortality in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therefore, to elicit leukemia-specific immune responses without alloimmune reaction, the possibilities of active immunotherapy methods such as leukemia vaccines have been studied for decades. Among various types of leukemia vaccines, whole leukemia cell vaccines are known to be able to induce immune responses against multiple unknown antigens without the need for adoptive transfer of dendritic cells. In this review, we will discuss the past progress of whole leukemia cell vaccines, with a focus on strategies to enhance their immunogenicity. We will also present the future directions of whole leukemia cell vaccines along with addressing newly emerging concepts, such as immunogenic cell death and necroptosis. We will not discuss in detail other factors that can reduce the therapeutic efficacy of whole leukemia cell vaccines such as various immunosuppressive mechanisms of leukemia.

1 November 2016 in Leukemia Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKChan Kyu Kim
Chan Kyu Kim
DHDong Hoon Han
Dong Hoon Han
YJYoung Seok Ji
Young Seok Ji
MLMin Sung Lee
Min Sung Lee
CMChang Wook Min
Chang Wook Min
HKHee Kyung Kim
Hee Kyung Kim

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JYJina Yun
Jina Yun
YJYoung sok Ji
Young sok Ji
GJGeum Ha Jang
Geum Ha Jang
SLSung Hee Lim
Sung Hee Lim
SKSe Hyung Kim
Se Hyung Kim
SPSeong Kyu Park
Seong Kyu Park
Tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2) is one of the most frequently mutated genes in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). TET2 is known to involve a demethylation process, and the loss of TET2 is thought to cause DNA hypermethylation. Loss of TET2 function is known to be caused by genetic mutations and miRNA, such as miR-22. We analyzed 41 MDS patients receiving hypomethylating therapy (HMT) to assess whether TET2 mutation status and miR-22 expression status were associated with their clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. Responsiveness to HMT was not affected by both TET2 mutation (odds ratio (OR) 0.900, p = 0.909) and high miR-22 expression (OR 1.548, p = 0.631). There was a tendency for TET2 mutation to be associated with lower-risk disease based on IPSS (Gamma = −0.674, p = 0.073), lower leukemic transformation (OR 0.170, p = 0.040) and longer survival (Hazard ratio 0.354, p = 0.059). Although high miR-22 expression also showed a similar tendency, this tendency was weaker than that of TET2 mutation. In summary, the loss of TET2 function, including both TET2 mutation and high miR-22 expression, was not a good biomarker for predicting the response to HMT but may be associated with lower-risk disease based on IPSS, lower leukemic transformation and longer survival.

25 October 2022 in Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMInki Moon
Inki Moon
MKMin Gyu Kong
Min Gyu Kong
YJYoung sok Ji
Young sok Ji
SKSe Hyung Kim
Se Hyung Kim
SPSeong Kyu Park
Seong Kyu Park
PHPh.D.
Ph.D.
Inki Moon, M.D., M.S., Min Gyu Kong, M.D., M.S., Young Sok Ji, M.D., M.S., Se Hyung Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Seong Kyu Park, M.D., Ph.D., Jon Suh, M.D., Ph.D., and Mi-Ae Jang, M.D., Ph.D.. Ann Lab Med 2023;43:145-52. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.2.145