Anu Sivunen

Dr. Anu Sivunen

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 January 2017 in Journal of Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RRRonald E. Rice
Ronald E. Rice
SESandra K. Evans
Sandra K. Evans
KPKaty Pearce
Katy Pearce
ASAnu Sivunen
Anu Sivunen
JVJessica Vitak
Jessica Vitak
JTJeffrey W. Treem
Jeffrey W. Treem

10 November 2021 in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WZWard Van Zoonen
Ward Van Zoonen
ASAnu Sivunen
Anu Sivunen
A massive shift towards remote work practices has presented many organizations and employees with acute challenges associated with multi-locational work. This shift underscores the need to reconsider isolation as one of the focal challenges of organizations in an era of increasingly dispersed and mediated work practices. This study relies on a three-wave survey among Finnish workers to investigate how remote work practices and the use of information and communication technology (ICT) have impacted perceptions of isolation during the global health pandemic, and whether these relationships have an effect on psychological distress. The findings indicate that facilitating the use of ICTs may help organizations and employees combat isolation, while simultaneous increases in remote work practices lead employees to feel more isolated. In addition, the findings highlight a reciprocal effect between psychological distress and isolation, suggesting that strain may both increase perceptions of isolation and be a result of being isolated.

WZWard Van Zoonen
Ward Van Zoonen
ASAnu Sivunen
Anu Sivunen
KBKirsimarja Blomqvist
Kirsimarja Blomqvist
TOThomas Olsson
Thomas Olsson
ARAnnina Ropponen
Annina Ropponen
MVMatti Antero Vartiainen
Matti Antero Vartiainen
The COVID-19 crisis has disrupted when, where, and how employees work. Drawing on a sample of 5452 Finnish employees, this study explores the factors associated with employees’ abrupt adjustment to remote work. Specifically, this study examines structural factors (i.e., work independence and the clarity of job criteria), relational factors (i.e., interpersonal trust and social isolation), contextual factors of work (i.e., change in work location and perceived disruption), and communication dynamics (i.e., organizational communication quality and communication technology use (CTU)) as mechanisms underlying adjustment to remote work. The findings demonstrate that structural and contextual factors are important predictors of adjustment and that these relationships are moderated by communication quality and CTU. Contrary to previous research, trust in peers and supervisors does not support adjustment to remote work. We discuss the implications of these findings for practice during and beyond times of crisis.

31 May 2022 in Computers & Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PSPieta Sikström
Pieta Sikström
CVChiara Valentini
Chiara Valentini
ASAnu Sivunen
Anu Sivunen
TKTommi Kärkkäinen
Tommi Kärkkäinen

1 December 2017 in Human Resource Management Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJennifer L. Gibbs
Jennifer L. Gibbs
ASAnu Sivunen
Anu Sivunen
MBMaggie Boyraz
Maggie Boyraz

16 February 2022 in Computers in Human Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RJRasa Jämsen
Rasa Jämsen
ASAnu Sivunen
Anu Sivunen
KBKirsimarja Blomqvist
Kirsimarja Blomqvist
The global COVID-19 pandemic has led to numerous changes in society. This paper aims to understand how the abrupt transfer to remote work is reflected in employees' perceptions of relational communication at their work. Our research question is as follows: What kinds of perceptions and profiles regarding relational communication can be found among full-time remote workers? A sample of 1, 091 Finnish public sector employees with virtually no previous experience in remote work completed an open-ended survey during the first wave of the pandemic. The findings present 17 aspects of relational communication that the respondents mentioned as having changed because of moving to remote work. These aspects divide the respondents into three groups: those who found remote work as a challenge for relational communication, those who found it as an opportunity for relational communication, and those whose perceptions were ambivalent. The respondents’ individual characteristics are presented alongside their perceptions. The results reflect the diversity of relational communication in organizations, highlighting its importance to well-being and coping. The practical implications of the study reflect the typical time and place of relational communication in traditional organizing, offering insights into how to develop a culture that enables relational communication in remotely working organizations.