Lukas M. Löffel

Dr. Lukas M. Löffel

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2020 in Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLukas M. Löffel
Lukas M. Löffel
KBKaspar F. Bachmann
Kaspar F. Bachmann
MFMarc Alain Furrer
Marc Alain Furrer
PWPatrick Yves Wuethrich
Patrick Yves Wuethrich

8 July 2014 in Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLukas M. Löffel
Lukas M. Löffel
BKBettina Kleeb
Bettina Kleeb
FBFiona C Burkhard
Fiona C Burkhard
PWPatrick Yves Wuethrich
Patrick Yves Wuethrich
The optimal crystalloid solution to use perioperatively in patients undergoing open radical cystectomy remains unclear. Many of the fluids used for intravenous hydration contain supraphysiologic concentrations of chloride, which can induce hyperchloremia and metabolic acidosis, resulting in renal vasoconstriction and decreased renal function. In addition, patients receiving less fluid and less sodium show faster recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function after colonic surgery.

14 June 2019 in World Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DEDominique Engel
Dominique Engel
MFMarc A. Furrer
Marc A. Furrer
PWPatrick Yves Wuethrich
Patrick Yves Wuethrich
LLLukas M. Löffel
Lukas M. Löffel

1 March 2020 in Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLukas M. Löffel
Lukas M. Löffel
TGTobias Gross
Tobias Gross
MSMarc P. Schneider
Marc P. Schneider
FBFiona C. Burkhard
Fiona C. Burkhard
GTGeorge N. Thalmann
George N. Thalmann
MFMarc Alain Furrer
Marc Alain Furrer

21 August 2022 in European journal of pain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBChristian Beilstein
Christian Beilstein
MHMarkus Huber
Markus Huber
MFMarc Alain Furrer
Marc Alain Furrer
LLLukas M. Löffel
Lukas M. Löffel
PWPatrick Yves Wuethrich
Patrick Yves Wuethrich
DEDominique Engel
Dominique Engel
Background Prostatectomy is associated with relevant acute postoperative pain. Optimal analgesic techniques to minimize pain and enhance recovery are still under investigation. We aimed to compare the effect of three different analgesic techniques on quality of recovery. Methods This investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, three-arm, parallel-group, active-controlled, interventional superiority trial was performed in a Swiss teaching hospital from 2018 to 2021. Consecutive patients undergoing open or robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy were randomized to spinal anaesthesia (SSS, bupivacaine 0.5% + fentanyl), bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAP, ropivacaine 0.375% + clonidine) or systemic administration of lidocaine (SA, lidocaine 1%) in addition to general anaesthesia. Primary outcome was quality of recovery 15 (QoR-15) score on postoperative day one compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were QoR-15 at discharge, postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain scores, return of gastrointestinal function and use of rescue analgesia. Results From 133 patients, 40 received spinal anaesthesia, 45 TAP block and 48 systemic analgesia. QoR-15 scores did not differ on day 1 (p = 0.301) or at discharge (p = 0.309) when compared to baseline. QoR-15 changes were similar in all groups. At discharge, median QoR-15 scores were considered as good (>122) in all groups: SSS 134 [IQR 128-138]; TAP 129 [IQR 122-136] and SA 128 [IQR 123-136]. There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. Conclusions Quality of recovery on postoperative day one compared to baseline did not differ if spinal anaesthesia, TAP block or systemic administration of lidocaine was added to general anaesthesia. Significance Optimal analgesic techniques to enhance recovery after prostatectomy are still under investigation. In this 3-arm randomized controlled trial, addition of spinal anaesthesia or transversus abdominis plane block to general anaesthesia did not improve quality of recovery after radical prostatectomy compared to less invasive intravenous lidocaine infusion (standard of care/control group). Quality of recovery at the time of discharge was considered as good in all three groups.

13 December 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLukas M. Löffel
Lukas M. Löffel
DEDominique Engel
Dominique Engel
CBChristian Beilstein
Christian Beilstein
RHRobert G. Hahn
Robert G. Hahn
MFMarc Alain Furrer
Marc Alain Furrer
PWPatrick Yves Wuethrich
Patrick Yves Wuethrich
Preoperative dehydration is usually found in 30–50% of surgical patients, but the incidence is unknown in the urologic population. We determined the prevalence of preoperative dehydration in major elective urological surgery and studied its association with postoperative outcome, with special attention to plasma creatinine changes. We recruited 187 patients scheduled for major abdominal urological surgery to participate in a single-center study that used the fluid retention index (FRI), which is a composite index of four urinary biomarkers that correlate with renal water conservation, to assess the presence of dehydration. Secondary outcomes were postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), return of gastrointestinal function, in-hospital complications, quality of recovery, and plasma creatinine. The proportion of dehydrated patients at surgery was 20.4%. Dehydration did not correlate with quality of recovery, PONV, or other complications, but dehydrated patients showed later defecation (p = 0.02) and significant elevations of plasma creatinine after surgery. The elevations were also greater when plasma creatinine had increased rather than decreased during the 24 h prior to surgery (p < 0.001). Overall, the increase in plasma creatinine at 6 h after surgery correlated well with elevations on postoperative days one and two. In conclusion, we found preoperative dehydration in one-fifth of the patients. Dehydration was associated with delayed defecation and elevated postoperative plasma creatinine. The preoperative plasma creatinine pattern could independently forecast more pronounced increases during the early postoperative period.