Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a dreaded malignancy with a dismal 5-year survival rate despite maximal efforts on optimizing treatment strategies. Radical surgery is the only potential curative procedure. Unfortunately, the majority of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease, which renders them ineligible for curative resection. Early detection of PDAC is thus considered to be the most effective way to improve survival. In this regard, pancreatic screening has been proposed to improve results by detecting asymptomatic stages of PDAC and its precursors. There is now evidence of benefits of systematic surveillance in high-risk individuals, and the current guidelines emphasize the potential of screening to affect overall survival in individuals with genetic susceptibility syndromes or familial occurrence of PDAC. Here we aim to summarize the current knowledge about screening strategies for PDAC, including the latest epidemiological data, risk factors, associated hereditary syndromes, available screening modalities, benefits, limitations, as well as management implications.

Background: Stress has been suggested to play a potential role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis, but studies focussing on the occurrence of specific life stress events among IBD patients are scarce. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore the association between various life stress events and IBD. Methods: Patients with IBD (N = 98, mean age: 38.45, 54.1% men) were compared to a group of healthy controls (N = 405, mean age: 36.45, 58.0% men) originating from a health survey conducted on a representative population sample of Czech adults. The Life Stressor Checklist-Revised (LSC-R) was used to assess the stressors. Results: IBD patients had higher odds of reporting life stressors overall (p < 0.001), life stressors before the age of 16 (p < 0.004) and a higher score in traumatic stress (p < 0.005) and interpersonal violence (p < 0.001) when compared to the control group. Gender- and diagnosis-related differences are discussed. Conclusion: Reporting life stressors experienced during childhood or adulthood is strongly associated with IBD. This should be considered in illness management, especially in a severe course of IBD.

Water-aided colonoscope insertion reduces patients′ discomfort and need for sedation in unsedated and minimally sedated patients. However, water-aided technique has never been studied in inflammatory bowel disease patients, characterised by younger age, structural changes of the colon and need for repeated colonoscopies. Our trial was designed to evaluate discomfort associated with water-aided colonoscopy compared with air insufflation in on-demand sedated patients with known inflammatory bowel disease. In a randomised, single-centre study, 92 patients were randomised to either water-aided insertion and air insufflation during withdrawal [Water] or air insufflation during both insertion and withdrawal [Air]. The main outcome measured was success rate of unsedated colonoscopy, defined as reaching the caecum without requiring sedation and with discomfort during insertion of less than or equal to 5 using 0–10 continuous scale [0 = none, 10 = maximum pain]. Success rate of caecal intubation without sedation or invoking a discomfort score greater than 5 was significantly higher in the Water arm compared with the Air arm [73.9 vs 45.7%, p = 0.01]. Discomfort score during insertion [mean ± SD] was significantly lower in the Water than in the Air arm [3.8±2.4 vs 5.4±1.9, p < 0.001]. Other outcomes including procedural times, success rate of terminal ileum intubation, need for abdominal compression, and repositioning were comparable. There were no complications recorded in the study. Compared with air insufflation, water-aided colonoscopy significantly reduces discomfort in on-demand sedated patients with inflammatory bowel disease, achieving comparable procedural outcomes.

Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) is a promising novel deep enteroscopy technique. The purpose of our study was to evaluate efficiency and safety of MSE in a single tertiary endoscopy center.We pr...

Background and aims: Diagnosis of the biliary stricture remains a challenge. In view of the low sensitivity of brush cytology (BC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been reported as a useful adjunctive test in patients with biliary strictures. We aimed to determine performance characteristics of BC and FISH individually and in combination (BC + FISH) in the primary diagnosis of biliary strictures. Methods: This single-center prospective study was conducted between April 2019 and January 2021. Consecutive patients with unsampled biliary strictures undergoing first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in our institution were included. Tissue specimens from two standardized transpapillary brushings from the strictures were examined by routine cytology and FISH. Histopathological confirmation after surgery or 12-month follow-up was regarded as the reference standard for final diagnosis. Results: Of 109 enrolled patients, six were excluded and one lost from the final analysis. In the remaining 102 patients (60.8% males, mean age 67.4, range 25–92 years), the proportions of benign and malignant strictures were 28 (27.5%) and 74 (72.5%), respectively. The proportions of proximal and distal strictures were 26 (25.5%) and 76 (74.5%), respectively. In comparison to BC alone, FISH increased the sensitivity from 36.1% to 50.7% (p = 0.076) while maintaining similar specificity (p = 0.311). Conclusions: Dual-modality tissue evaluation using BC + FISH showed an improving trend in sensitivity for the primary diagnosis of biliary strictures when compared with BC alone.