Background: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is a serious threat to mass vaccination strategies that need to be accelerated currently in order to achieve a substantial level of community immunity. Independent (non-sponsored) studies have a great potential to enhance public confidence in vaccines and accelerate their uptake process. Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional study for the side effects (SE) of CoronaVac was carried out in February 2021 among Turkish healthcare workers who were recently vaccinated. The questionnaire inquired about local and systemic SEs that occurred in the short-term, within four weeks, following vaccination. Results: A total of 780 healthcare workers were included in this study; 62.5% of them experienced at least one SE. Injection site pain (41.5%) was the most common local SE, while fatigue (23.6%), headache (18.7%), muscle pain (11.2%) and joint pain (5.9%) were the common systemic SEs. Female healthcare workers (67.9%) were significantly more affected by local and systemic SEs than male colleagues (51.4%). Younger age, previous infection, and compromised health status (chronic illnesses and regular medicines uptake) can be associated with an increased risk of CoronaVac SEs; Conclusions: The independent research shows a higher prevalence of CoronaVac SEs than what is reported by phase I–III clinical trials. In general, the results of this study confirm the overall safety of CoronaVac and suggest potential risk factors for its SEs. Gender-based differences and SEs distribution among age groups are worth further investigation.

Pregnant and lactating women (PLW) represent a particular population subset with increased susceptibility for COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, even though the evidence about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines was delayed due to their initial exclusion from development trials. This unclear situation could have led to increased COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy levels among PLW; therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the attitudes of Czech PLW towards COVID-19 vaccines and the determinants of their attitudes. An analytical cross-sectional survey-based study was carried out in the University Hospital Brno (South Moravia, Czechia) between August and October 2021. The study utilised a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) adapted from previous instruments used for the same purpose. The SAQ included closed-ended items covering demographic characteristics, clinical and obstetric characteristics, attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, and potential psychosocial predictors of vaccine acceptance. Out of the 362 included participants, 278 were pregnant (PW) and 84 were lactating women (LW). The overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (immediate and delayed) level was substantially high (70.2%), with a significant difference between PW (76.6%) and LW (48.8%). Out of the 70.2% who agreed to receive the vaccine, 3.6% indicated immediate acceptance, and 66.6% indicated delayed acceptance. Only 13.3% of the participants indicated their acceptance of their physician’s vaccination recommendation during pregnancy or while lactating, and 62.2% were against it. Our results agreed with the recent studies that revealed that PW tended to have a high level of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, and they were also inclined to resist professional recommendations because they predominantly preferred to delay their vaccination. The pregnancy trimester, education level, employment status, and previous live births were significant determinants for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. The most commonly preferred vaccine type was mRNA-based vaccines, followed by viral vector-based and inactivated virus vaccines. The first top priority of PLW was vaccine safety for their children, followed by vaccine safety for the PLW and vaccine effectiveness. Regarding psychosocial predictors, media/social media, trust in the government, the pharmaceutical industry, and healthcare professionals, partners, and a positive risk-benefit ratio were significant promoters for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Findings from this study suggest that promotional interventions targeting PLW should use web platforms and focus on vaccine safety evidence, the expected benefits of vaccines and potential harms of the infection.

Assessing the Learning Curve of Linear and Wedge Labiaplasty Using the Cumulative Summation (CUSUM) Test - Anatolian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Introduction: Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of ovarian carcinoma patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery in our clinic has been evaluated with the measures of adjuvant chemotherapy requirement, recurrence and survival rates. Materials and methods: Cases who underwent cytoreductive surgery between 2018-2019 in our clinic are evaluated in aspects of age at diagnosis, menopausal status, pathological stage of tumor, size of tumor, mode of surgical therapy, duration of surgery, neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy choice, follow-up protocol, synchronous/metachronous state, rate of relapses and survival. Results and discussion: The mean age of total 23 operated cases is 59±8.9. %69,6 of all cases is found to be primary ovarian carcinoma, whereas %30,4 is ovarian metastasis of other malignancies. Among metastatic cases, three is primary carcinoma of colon, one is gastric cancer and one is primary carcinoma of bladder. In other two cases, invasion of endometrial cancer to the ovary was observed. In addition to the standard surgical procedures, one case has undergone diagnostic mass resection, one sole total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and bilateral salpingooferectomy (BSO) and 21 omentectomy (OMT). Among these 21 cases one has undergone bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and five (%21,7) bilateral pelvic paraaortic lymph node dissection (BPPLND). In addition to TAH, BSO, OMT and BPPLND; nine (%39,1) cases has undergone low anterior resection, one cystectomy, one distal pancreas resection and one partial gastrectomy. Three (%13) of the cases has been diagnosed in stage 1, one in stage 2, nine (%39,1) in stage 3 and ten (%43,5) in stage 4. Four (%17,4) of the cases had taken neoadjuvant chemotherapy priorly to the surgery. Twenty-one (%91,3) of the cases took adjuvant chemotherapy and one chemoradiotherapy. Relapses has been observed in the follow up of two (%8,7) cases. Nineteen (%82,6) of the cases are currently in disease-free state and four (%17,4) has been in exitus state. Conclusion: Surgery is the major modality of treatment in ovarian cancer. Various surgical resections by experienced gynecologists may be in need to achieve optimal cytoreduction and multidisciplinary approach is substantially important.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome in Infertile Women: A Cross-Sectional Study - Anatolian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research