The activity of many antibiotics depends on the initial density of cells used in bacterial growth inhibition assays. This phenomenon, termed the inoculum effect, can have important consequences for the therapeutic efficacy of the drugs, because bacterial loads vary by several orders of magnitude in clinically relevant infections. Antimicrobial peptides are a promising class of molecules in the fight against drug-resistant bacteria because they act mainly by perturbing the cell membranes rather than by inhibiting intracellular targets. Here, we report a systematic characterization of the inoculum effect for this class of antibacterial compounds. Minimum inhibitory concentration values were measured for 13 peptides (including all-D enantiomers) and peptidomimetics, covering more than seven orders of magnitude in inoculated cell density. In most cases, the inoculum effect was significant for cell densities above the standard inoculum of 5 × 10⁵ cells/mL, while for lower densities the active concentrations remained essentially constant, with values in the micromolar range. In the case of membrane-active peptides, these data can be rationalized by considering a simple model, taking into account peptide–cell association, and hypothesizing that a threshold number of cell-bound peptide molecules is required in order to cause bacterial killing. The observed effect questions the clinical utility of activity and selectivity determinations performed at a fixed, standardized cell density. A routine evaluation of the dependence of the activity of antimicrobial peptides and peptidomimetics on the inoculum should be considered. Significance Bacterial drug resistance is a crucial threat to global health, and antimicrobials with novel mechanisms of action are urgently needed. Antimicrobial peptides are natural molecules that kill bacteria mostly by perturbing their membranes, and they constitute promising compounds for fighting resistant microbes. Their activity is normally tested under standardized conditions of bacterial density. However, the bacterial load in clinically relevant infections varies by many orders of magnitude. Here, we show that the minimum peptide concentration needed for bacterial growth inhibition can vary by more than 100-fold with an increase in the density of cells in the initial inoculum of the assay (a phenomenon termed the “inoculum effect”). These findings question the utility of the currently used activity screening assays.

A new Coronavirus strain, named SARS-CoV-2, suddenly emerged in early December 2019. SARS-CoV-2 resulted in being dramatically infectious, with thousands of people infected. In this scenario, and without effective vaccines available, the importance of an immediate tool to support patients and against viral diffusion becomes evident. In this study, we exploit the molecular docking approach to analyze the affinity between different viral proteins and several inhibitors, originally developed for other viral infections. Our data show that, in some cases, a relevant binding can be detected. These findings support the hypothesis to develop new antiviral agents against COVID-19, on the basis of already established therapies.

We developed a new class of inhibitors of protein–protein interactions of the SHP2 phosphatase, which is pivotal in cell signaling and represents a central target in the therapy of cancer and rare diseases. Currently available SHP2 inhibitors target the catalytic site or an allosteric pocket but lack specificity or are ineffective for disease-associated SHP2 mutants. Considering that pathogenic lesions cause signaling hyperactivation due to increased levels of SHP2 association with cognate proteins, we developed peptide-based molecules with nanomolar affinity for the N-terminal Src homology domain of SHP2, good selectivity, stability to degradation, and an affinity for pathogenic variants of SHP2 that is 2–20 times higher than for the wild-type protein. The best peptide reverted the effects of a pathogenic variant (D61G) in zebrafish embryos. Our results provide a novel route for SHP2-targeted therapies and a tool for investigating the role of protein–protein interactions in the function of SHP2.

Host‐defense peptides (HPDs) are bactericidal and immunomodulatory molecules, part of the innate immune system of many organisms, including man. They kill bacteria mostly by perturbing their membranes, and for this reason they are a promising class of molecules to fight drug‐resistant microbes. However, their success towards clinical application is still limited, partly due to many unanswered questions on their activity and function. Our current understanding of HDPs has been reached by two parallel, but largely independent, approaches: microbiological studies on HDP effects on cells, and physicochemical investigations on model membranes. All current models for the mechanisms of HDP membrane perturbation and cell selectivity were derived from the latter kind of studies, but their relevance for real cells still had to be demonstrated. In the last few years, several studies led to quantitative insights into HDP behavior directly in cells: membrane‐binding and peptide‐induced pores in bacteria and liposomes were compared; the number of cell‐bound peptide molecules needed to kill a bacterium was determined; the variation of peptide activity and toxicity with the density of cells was characterized; selectivity was examined in a mixture of target and host cells; the sequence of events leading to bacterial death was observed in real time by microscopy on single cells. Overall, these approaches led to a new understanding of HDPs that will be helpful for their development into effective antibiotic drugs.