Sara Cecchini

Dr. Sara Cecchini


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSara Cecchini
Sara Cecchini
Mirko Di RosaMirko Di Rosa
Mirko Di Rosa
LSLuca Soraci
Luca Soraci
AFAlessia Fumagalli
Alessia Fumagalli
CMClementina Misuraca
Clementina Misuraca
FLFabrizia Lattanzio
Fabrizia Lattanzio
Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of chest X-ray (CXR) score, frailty, and clinical and laboratory data on in-hospital mortality of hospitalized older patients with COVID-19. Methods. This retrospective study included 122 patients 65 years or older with positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and with availability to CXRs on admission. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Statistical analysis was conducted using Cox regression. The predictive ability of the CXR score was compared with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and fever data using Area Under the Curve (AUC) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) statistics. Results. Of 122 patients, 67 died during hospital stay (54.9%). The CXR score (HR: 1.16, 95% CI, 1.04–1.28), CFS (HR: 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09–1.47), and presence of fever (HR: 1.75; 95% CI, 1.03–2.97) were significant predictors of in-hospital mortality. The addition of both the CFS and presence of fever to the CXR score significantly improved the prediction of in-hospital mortality (NRI, 0.460; 95% CI, 0.102 to 0.888; AUC difference: 0.117; 95% CI, 0.041 to 0.192, p = 0.003). Conclusions. CXR score, CFS, and presence of fever were the main predictors of in-hospital mortality in our cohort of hospitalized older patients with COVID-19. Adding frailty and presence of fever to the CXR score statistically improved predictive accuracy compared to single risk factors.

22 August 2024 in Tomography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSara Cecchini
Sara Cecchini
CGCristina Gatti
Cristina Gatti
DFDaniela Fornarelli
Daniela Fornarelli
LFLorenzo Fantechi
Lorenzo Fantechi
CRCinzia Romagnolo
Cinzia Romagnolo
EEEnrico Enrico
Enrico Enrico
Background: Distinguishing between Charcot Neuroarthropathy (CN), osteomyelitis (OM), and CN complicated with superimposed OM in diabetic patients is crucial for the treatment choice. Given that current diagnostic methods lack specificity, advanced techniques, e.g., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 99mTc-HMPAO–WBC Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT), are needed. This study addresses the challenges in distinguishing OM and CN. Methods: We included diabetic patients with CN and soft tissue ulceration. MRI and 99mTc-HMPAO–WBC SPECT/CT were used for the diagnosis. The patients were classified into three probability levels for OM (i.e., Definite, Probable, and Unlikely) according to the Consensus Criteria for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis (CC-DFO). Results: Eight patients met the eligibility criteria. MRI, supported by SPECT-CT and CC-DFO, showed consistency with the OM diagnosis in three cases. The key diagnostic features included the location of signal abnormalities and secondary features such as skin ulcers, sinus tracts, and abscesses. Notably, cases with inconclusive MRI were clarified by SPECT/CT, emphasizing its efficacy in challenging scenarios. Conclusions: The primary objective of this study was to compare the results of MRI and 99mTc-HMPAO–WBC SPECT/CT with the CC-DFO score in the diabetic foot with CN and suspected OM. Advanced imaging offers a complementary approach to distinguish between CN and OM. This can help delineate the limits of the disease for presurgical planning. While MRI is valuable, 99mTc-HMPAO–WBC SPECT/CT provides additional clarity, especially in challenging cases or when metallic implants affect MRI accuracy.

31 March 2025 in Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LFLorenzo Fantechi
Lorenzo Fantechi
FBFederico Barbarossa
Federico Barbarossa
SCSara Cecchini
Sara Cecchini
LZLorenzo Zoppi
Lorenzo Zoppi
Giulio AmabiliGiulio Amabili
Giulio Amabili
RBRoberta Bevilacqua
Roberta Bevilacqua
(1) Background: Predicting hospitalization length for COVID-19 patients is crucial for optimizing resource allocation and patient management. Radiomics, combined with machine learning (ML), offers a promising approach by extracting quantitative imaging features from CT scans. The aim of the present study is to use and adapt machine learning (ML) architectures, exploiting CT radiomics information, and analyze algorithms’ capability to predict hospitalization at the time of patient admission. (2) Methods: The original CT lung images of 168 COVID-19 patients underwent two segmentations, isolating the ground glass area of the lung parenchyma. After an isotropic voxel resampling and wavelet and Laplacian of Gaussian filtering, 92 intensity and texture radiomics features were extracted. Feature reduction was conducted by applying a last absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) to the radiomic features set. Three ML classification algorithms, linear support vector machine (LSVM), medium neural network (MNN), and ensemble subspace discriminant (ESD), were trained and validated through a 5-fold cross-validation technique. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). (3) Results: The LSVM classifier achieved the highest predictive performance, with an accuracy of 86.0% and an AUC of 0.93. However, reliable outcomes are also registered when MNN and ESD architecture are used. (4) Conclusions: The study shows that radiomic features can be used to build a machine learning framework for predicting patient hospitalization duration. The findings suggest that radiomics-based ML models can accurately predict COVID-19 hospitalization length.

20 May 2024 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
FMFrancesca Marchegiani
Francesca Marchegiani
RGROBERTA GALEAZZI
ROBERTA GALEAZZI
FMFausto Moroni
Fausto Moroni
SAStefania Appolloni
Stefania Appolloni
ACAntonio Cherubini
Antonio Cherubini
APAntonio Domenico Procopio
Antonio Domenico Procopio
D-dimer testing in combination with clinical assessment is commonly used to diagnose suspected DVT and pulmonary embolism. However, as D-dimer levels are physiologically higher in elderly patients, this test loses clinical specificity in the setting of geriatric patients. The aim of our study was to investigate the changes in D-dimer levels with age and the specificity of the D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. 1617 elderly patients consecutively admitted to the Geriatric Emergency Care Department of the INRCA-IRCCS hospital between January 2013 and February 2014 and for whom D-dimer results were available were included. The D-dimer immunoturbidimetric assay was performed on a cs-2100i Sysmex Siemens using a conventional cut-off level of 500 µg/L. The median D-dimer level was 1200 [550-2990] µg/L FEU, and the percentage of patients with D-dimer levels below the conventional cut-off was only 22.1%. As expected, there was a significant age-related increase in D-dimer, even when sex was considered, and a significant decrease in the specificity of D-dimer assay with age. The most established use of D-dimer testing is in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Our study confirms the need for an age-adjusted cut-off for D-dimer testing in geriatric patients.