The etiology of the current acute severe non-A-E hepatitis epidemic in children remains unclear. We aimed to describe the occurrence and outcomes of acute severe hepatitis in pediatric patients in North-West Germany over a period of more than 30 years and in the context of the current epidemic. We analyzed all cases of acute severe hepatitis in childhood, as defined by the World Health Organization, at Hannover Medical School from 1990 and at the University Hospital of Essen from 2009 to 16 May 2022. We separated cases into a historic cohort (1990-2018) and a COVID-19 era cohort (2019-2022). After application of exclusion criteria, 107 patients with acute severe hepatitis were identified (2.32 cases/center/year). Annual incidence per center rose significantly from 2.2 (historic cohort until 2018) to 4.25/center/year (from 2019, p = 0.002). Of all cases, 75.7% presented with jaundice, while 53.3% had clinical signs of infection. Two cases of adenovirus were proven (2004/2016), other pathogens detected were HHV-6 (4), CMV, HSV, EBV(3). Sixty-nine patients (64.5%) met the criteria of pediatric acute liver failure, with 44 requiring liver transplantation. In the current cohort, patients with infection, gastrointestinal symptoms and higher alanine aminotransferase had a better chance of transplant-free survival, whereas hepatic encephalopathy, higher international normalized ratio and bilirubin predicted a poor outcome. Twenty-five patients developed hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia and 19 patients (17.8%) died. Acute non-A-E-hepatitis in children is a rare but severe entity, often leading to acute liver failure. Clinical presentation in our current cohort resembles 2022 NAEH cases, with improved outcomes compared to historic controls. The rising incidence of NAEH in our centers since 2019, in the absence of adenoviral infection, indicates other potential triggers of similar NAEH cases. As the current epidemic of severe acute non-A-E-hepatitis cases in children highlights our limited understanding in the field, we aim to describe current cases, characterizing the presentation over time, and defining similarities and discrepancies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our data show a rising incidence of non-A-E-hepatitis cases since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. These cases were not associated with adenoviral infections, suggesting that the recently described accumulation of adenovirus infections in relationship to hepatitis is a new trigger for a known phenomenon, rather than a new disease entity. Therefore, the role of protective isolation and subsequent lack of contact with trivial infections in children during the pandemic should be the subject of further examinations. We expect our data to contribute to a better understanding of severe acute hepatitis in childhood, increased vigilance for this potentially lethal disease beyond the current epidemic, and ultimately improved clinical diagnosis and care.

(1) Background and Aim: Despite excellent long-term results in pediatric liver transplantation (pLTx), mortality and graft loss still are to be diminished. We aim to describe time-dependent changes and long-term outcome of a large single-center pLTx cohort and to identify independent recipient-related risk factors impairing patient and graft survival. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study analyzing all pediatric liver transplants from 1983–2020. Risk factors for mortality and graft loss were identified by univariable and multi-linear regression analysis. (3) Results: We analyzed 858 liver transplantations in 705 pediatric patients. Five-year patient/graft survival increased from 60.9%/48.0% (1983–1992) to 97.5%/86.5% (OR = 12.5; p < 0.0001/OR = 6.5; p < 0.0001) (2014–2020). Indications changed significantly over time, with a higher proportion of patients being transplanted for malignancies and metabolic disease and indications of PFIC and α1AT-deficiency declining. The era of transplantation (log7.378/9.657; p < 0.0001) and indication of acute liver failure (log = 1.944/2.667; HR = 2.015/1.772; p = 0.0114/0.002) impairs patient/graft survival significantly in the multivariate analysis. Furthermore, patient survival is worsened by re-transplantation (log = 1.755; HR = 1.744; p = 0.0176) and prolonged waiting times in high-urgency status (log = 2.588; HR = 1.073; p = 0.0026), whereas the indication of biliary atresia improved outcome (log = 1.502; HR = 0.575; p = 0.0315). Graft survival was additionally impaired by pre-existing portal vein thrombosis (log = 1.482; HR = 2.016; p = 0.0330). (4) Conclusions: Despite more complex indications, patient and graft survival after pLTx continue to improve.. Acute liver failure remains the indication with poorest outcome, and listing for high urgency liver transplantation should be considered carefully and early to keep waiting time on HU list short. Furthermore, pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis should be prevented whenever possible to improve graft survival.

Growth failure persists after pediatric liver transplantation and impairs pediatric development and quality of life. Steroid dose minimization attempts to prevent growth impairment, yet long‐term assessment in pediatric liver recipients is lacking. We identified risk factors for impaired linear growth after pediatric liver transplantation, with a special focus on low‐dose steroid therapy. This is a single‐center retrospective analysis of height development in pediatric liver recipients up to 5 years after transplantation. Risk factors for impaired linear growth (height Z‐scores≤‐2) at transplantation, after two (n = 347) and five years (n = 210) were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. At transplantation, growth retardation was found in 52.2%, predominantly younger children. Height Z‐scores improved from −2.23 to −1.40 (SE 0.11; 95%CI 0.74–1.16; p < .001) two years and −1.19 (SE 0.07;0.08–0.34; p = .017) five years post‐transplant. Multivariate analysis showed previous growth impairment (OR=1.484; 95%‐CI=1.107–1.988; p = .004), graft loss (49.006;2.232–1076; p = .006), and prolonged cold ischemic time (1.034;1.007–1.061; p = .011) as main long‐term risk factors; steroid use was a significant predictor of 2‐year but not 5‐year growth impairment. In univariate analysis, impaired growth after 2 and 5 years was associated with continuous low‐dose (2.5 mg/m²BSA) steroid therapy (OR=3.323;1.578–6.996; p < .001/OR=8.352;1.089–64.07; p = .006)and graft loss (OR=2.513;1.395–4.525; p = .003/OR=3.378;1.815–7.576; p < .001). Furthermore, indication and era of transplantation affected growth. Our results show significant catch‐up growth after pediatric liver transplantation, yet growth failure strongly affects particularly young liver recipients. The main influenceable long‐term risk factor is pre‐existing growth failure, emphasizing the importance of early aggressive nutritional therapy. Moreover, low‐dose steroid therapy might impair growth and should therefore be critically questioned in long‐term immunosuppression.

The incidence of pediatric liver tumors in general has been rising over the last years and so is the number of children undergoing liver transplantation for this indication. To contribute to the ongoing improvement of pre- and post-transplant care, we aim to describe outcome and risk factors in our patient cohort. We have compared characteristics and outcome for patients transplanted for hepatoblastoma to other liver malignancies in our center between 1983 and 2022 and analysed influential factors on tumor recurrence and mortality using nominal logistic regression analysis. Of 39 children (16 f) who had transplants for liver malignancy, 31 were diagnosed with hepatoblastoma. The proportion of malignant tumors in the transplant cohort rose from 1.9% (1983–1992) to 9.1% in the current decade (p < 0.0001). Hepatoblastoma patients were transplanted at a younger age and were more likely to have tumor extent beyond the liver. Post-transplant bile flow impairment requiring intervention was significantly higher compared to our total cohort (48 vs. 24%, p > 0.0001). Hearing loss was a common side effect of ototoxic chemotherapy in hepatoblastoma patients (48%). The most common maintenance immunosuppression were mTor-inhibitors. Risk factors for tumor recurrence in patients with hepatoblastoma were higher AFP before transplant (AFP_pre-LTX), a low ratio of AFP_max to AFP_pre-LTX and salvage transplantation. Liver malignancies represent a rising number of indications for liver transplantation in childhood. Primary tumor resection can spare a liver transplant with all its long-term complications, but in case of tumor recurrence, transplantation might have inferior outcome. The rate of acute biopsy-proven rejections and biliary complications in comparison to our total transplant cohort needs further investigations.

Immunosuppressive combination therapy with MMF can reduce CNI associated nephrotoxicity. We investigated effectiveness and safety of de novo MMF‐tacrolimus based immunosuppression after pLTx. Patients after pLTx receiving immunosuppression with MMF/tacrolimus (MMF/TAC) were compared to retrospectively selected age‐ and diagnosis‐matched patients with tacrolimus monotherapy (TAC) and cyclosporine/prednisolone therapy (CSA) (19 patients each, n = 57). Effectiveness, renal function and side effects were analyzed for 1 year after pLTx. Tacrolimus reduction in combination therapy (0.7 μg/L over the year) was lower than aspired (2 μg/L).Acute BPAR occurred equally in MMF/TAC and TAC groups (31.6% each), being slightly higher in CSA group (42.1%; OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 0.42‐5.44;P = .5).GFR deteriorated comparably in all 3 groups (P < .01 each) without significant differences between the groups. Septicemia was detected significantly more often in MMF/TAC (73.6%) than in TAC (31.6%) (OR 4.17; 1.07‐16.27;P = .04). EBV reactivation occurred more often in CSA patients (84.2%) than in MMF/TAC (47.4%; OR 5.16; 0.98‐27.19;P = .05) and TAC patients (52.6%; OR 8.16; 1.48‐44.89;P = .02) the same was true for other viral infections (47.4% (CSA) vs 15.8% (TAC); OR 4.21; 0.95‐18.55;P = .05). Our study does not provide additional evidence for a benefit of initial use of MMF/TAC over TAC regarding renal function, but raises concerns regarding a potentially increased risk of serious infections under MMF/TAC compared to TAC monotherapy at equivalent renal outcome; our study is, however, limited by the minor CNI reduction in combination therapy.

The reported prevalence of autoantibodies (AAB) (ANA, SMA, LKM, SLA) after pediatric liver transplantation (pLTX) varies considerably from 26–75%, but their clinical impact on outcome is uncertain. We aimed to study the prevalence of AAB after pLTX, their association with donor-, transplant-, and recipient-characteristics, and their relation to outcome. In our multicenter retrospective study, we aimed to clarify conflicting results from earlier studies. Six ERN TransplantChild centers reported data on 242 patients, of whom 61% were AAB positive. Prevalence varied across these centers. Independent of the interval between pLTX and AAB analysis, a one-hour increase in CIT resulted in an odds ratio (OR) of 1.37 (95% CI 1.11–1.69) for SMA positivity and an OR of 1.42 (95%CI 1.18–1.72) for ANA positivity. Steroid-free immunosuppression (IS) versus steroid-including IS (OR 5.28; 95% CI 1.45–19.28) was a risk factor for SMA positivity. Liver enzymes were not associated with ANA or SMA positivity. We did not observe an association of rejection activity index with ANA or SMA. However, the liver fibrosis score in follow-up biopsies was associated with ANA titer and donor age. In conclusion, this first multicenter study on AAB after pLTX showed high AAB prevalence and varied widely between centers. Longer CIT and prednisolone-free-IS were associated with AAB positivity, whereas AAB were not indicative of rejection, but instead were associated with graft fibrosis. The detection of AAB may be a marker of liver fibrosis and may be taken into consideration when indications for liver biopsy and immunosuppressive regimes, or reduction of immunosuppression in long-term follow-up, are being discussed. Prospective immunological profiling of pLTX patients, including AAB, is important to further improve our understanding of transplant immunology and silent graft fibrosis.