Jae-Woo Cho

Dr. Jae-Woo Cho

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ELEic Ju Lim
Eic Ju Lim
HSHyun-Chul Shon
Hyun-Chul Shon
JCJae-Woo Cho
Jae-Woo Cho
JOJK Oh
JK Oh
JKJunhyun Kim
Junhyun Kim
CKChul-Ho Kim
Chul-Ho Kim
Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are known to be especially unstable FNFs, and they have a higher associated risk of failure. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) technique and the cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) technique are the two main fixation techniques used in the treatment of FNFs. However, no large clinical study has compared the DHS and CCS techniques in patients with high-shear-angle FNFs. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies that compared the DHS and CCS techniques for the treatment of Pauwels type II or type III FNF. Pooled analysis was performed to identify differences between the DHS and CCS techniques in Pauwels type II or type III FNF, with a focus on postoperative complications such as fracture nonunion and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). We included five studies with a total of 252 patients. The DHS technique was used in 96 patients (DHS group), and the CCS technique was used in 156 patients (CCS group). The pooled analysis revealed that the nonunion rate in the CCS group was significantly higher than that in the DHS group (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11–0.96; p = 0.04, I2 = 0%), but there was no difference in the incidence of ONFH between the groups (OR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.20–4.73; p = 0.98, I2 = 53%). For vertically oriented FNFs, the DHS technique is more favorable and has a lower risk of fracture nonunion than the CCS technique.

1 October 2018 in Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJae-Woo Cho
Jae-Woo Cho
JKJinil Kim
Jinil Kim
WCWon-Tae Cho
Won-Tae Cho
WKWilliam T. Kent
William T. Kent
HKHyung-Jin Kim
Hyung-Jin Kim
JOJK Oh
JK Oh

1 July 2019 in Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BMByung-Woo Min
Byung-Woo Min
KLKyung-Jae Lee
Kyung-Jae Lee
JOJK Oh
JK Oh
Chul-Hyun ChoChul-Hyun Cho
Chul-Hyun Cho
JCJae-Woo Cho
Jae-Woo Cho
BKBeom-Soo Kim
Beom-Soo Kim

1 June 2021 in Injury
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJae-Woo Cho
Jae-Woo Cho
WCWon-Tae Cho
Won-Tae Cho
SSSeungyeob Sakong
Seungyeob Sakong
ELEic Ju Lim
Eic Ju Lim
WCWonseok Choi
Wonseok Choi
JOJK Oh
JK Oh

13 July 2021 in Nanomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSomang Choi
Somang Choi
HJHan-Saem Jo
Han-Saem Jo
HSHee Gyeong Song
Hee Gyeong Song
HKHaK-Jun Kim
HaK-Jun Kim
JOJK Oh
JK Oh
SKSung Eun Kim
Sung Eun Kim
In the current study, we fabricated tannic acid-alendronate (TA-ALN) nanocomplexes (NPXs) via self-assembly. These TA-ALNs were characterized by dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, transmission electron microscopy, and FT-IR spectroscopy. The TA-ALNs were evaluated for antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and osteogenesis-accelerating abilities in osteoblast-like cells (MC3T3-E1 cells). All TA-ALNs displayed nano-sized beads that were circular in form. Treatment with TA-ALN (1:0.1) efficiently removed reactive oxygen species in cells and protected osteoblast-like cells from toxic hydrogen peroxide conditions. Moreover, TA-ALN (1:0.1) could markedly decrease the mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory mediators in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated cells. Furthermore, cells treated with TA-ALN (1:1) exhibited not only significantly greater alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium collection, but also outstandingly higher mRNA levels of osteogenesis-related elements such as collagen type I and osteocalcin. These outcomes indicate that the prepared TA-ALNs are excellent for antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and osteogenic acceleration. Accordingly, TA-ALN can be used latently for bone renovation and regeneration in people with bone fractures, diseases, or disorders.

2 April 2020 in Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJae-Woo Cho
Jae-Woo Cho
WKWilliam T. Kent
William T. Kent
Chang-Wug OhChang-Wug Oh
Chang-Wug Oh
BKBeom-Soo Kim
Beom-Soo Kim
WCWon-Tae Cho
Won-Tae Cho
JOJK Oh
JK Oh
Background: Little is known about the volumetric changes of grafted bone over time when using the induced membrane technique. This study investigates the volumetric changes of bone graft using serial computed tomographic (CT) scans following the induced membrane technique. Methods: Patients with critical-sized bone defects had serial CT scans after undergoing bone-grafting using the induced membrane technique. CT scans to evaluate the volume of bone graft were obtained immediately postoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. The change in the volume of bone graft was determined at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Patient demographic characteristics, the location and composition of the bone graft, and the type of fixation construct were analyzed. Results: Forty patients met inclusion criteria. There were 27 tibiae and 13 femora with a mean size defect of 8.6 cm (range, 2.5 to 20.6 cm). Of these patients, 21 received autograft with cancellous bone graft and 19 received mixed autogenous bone with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) at a mean time of 17 weeks after the membrane formation. For the first 6 months, there was an overall osseous resorption of −9.9%. The overall graft volume from 6 to 12 months demonstrated an increase of osseous volume by +1.6%. For the entire 12-month period, there was a mean graft volume resorption of −8.3%. A correlation was found between the early volumetric changes of grafted bone and the percentage of DBM in the graft mixture. A correlation was also found between the late volumetric changes and the location of defect or the type of fixation. Conclusions: At 1 year after use of the induced membrane technique for the treatment of a critical-sized bone defect, resorption of the grafted bone averaged −8.3%. The volumetric changes were influenced by the property of the grafted bone, the fixation construct, and the location of the defect. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.