Shelly Soffer

Dr. Shelly Soffer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2019 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSShelly Soffer
Shelly Soffer
ABAvi Ben-Cohen
Avi Ben-Cohen
OSOrit Shimon
Orit Shimon
MAMichal Marianne Amitai
Michal Marianne Amitai
HGHayit Greenspan
Hayit Greenspan
EKEyal Klang
Eyal Klang
Deep learning has rapidly advanced in various fields within the past few years and has recently gained particular attention in the radiology community. This article provides an introduction to deep learning technology and presents the stages that are entailed in the design process of deep learning radiology research. In addition, the article details the results of a survey of the application of deep learning-specifically, the application of convolutional neural networks-to radiologic imaging that was focused on the following five major system organs: chest, breast, brain, musculoskeletal system, and abdomen and pelvis. The survey of the studies is followed by a discussion about current challenges and future trends and their potential implications for radiology. This article may be used as a guide for radiologists planning research in the field of radiologic image analysis using convolutional neural networks.

23 May 2020 in Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKEyal Klang
Eyal Klang
GKGassan Kassim
Gassan Kassim
SSShelly Soffer
Shelly Soffer
RFRobert Freeman
Robert Freeman
MLMatthew A. Levin
Matthew A. Levin
DRDavid L. Reich
David L. Reich

1 March 2020 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EKEyal Klang
Eyal Klang
YBYiftach Barash
Yiftach Barash
RMReuma Yehuda Margalit
Reuma Yehuda Margalit
SSShelly Soffer
Shelly Soffer
OSOrit Shimon
Orit Shimon
UKUri Kopylov
Uri Kopylov

7 April 2025 in Nature Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MOMahmud Omar
Mahmud Omar
SSShelly Soffer
Shelly Soffer
RAReem Agbareia
Reem Agbareia
NBNicola Luigi Bragazzi
Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
DADonald U. Apakama
Donald U. Apakama
EKEyal Klang
Eyal Klang

1 October 2020 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSShelly Soffer
Shelly Soffer
EKEyal Klang
Eyal Klang
OSOrit Shimon
Orit Shimon
NNNoy Nachmias
Noy Nachmias
RERami Eliakim
Rami Eliakim
YBYiftach Barash
Yiftach Barash

4 August 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShelly Soffer
Shelly Soffer
EKEyal Klang
Eyal Klang
OSOrit Shimon
Orit Shimon
YBYiftach Barash
Yiftach Barash
NCNoa Cahan
Noa Cahan
EKEli Konen
Eli Konen
Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis. However, this diagnosis is susceptible to misdiagnosis. In this study, we aimed to perform a systematic review of current literature applying deep learning for the diagnosis of PE on CTPA. MEDLINE/PUBMED were searched for studies that reported on the accuracy of deep learning algorithms for PE on CTPA. The risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted. Seven studies met our inclusion criteria. A total of 36,847 CTPA studies were analyzed. All studies were retrospective. Five studies provided enough data to calculate summary estimates. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for PE detection were 0.88 (95% CI 0.803–0.927) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.756–0.924), respectively. Most studies had a high risk of bias. Our study suggests that deep learning models can detect PE on CTPA with satisfactory sensitivity and an acceptable number of false positive cases. Yet, these are only preliminary retrospective works, indicating the need for future research to determine the clinical impact of automated PE detection on patient care. Deep learning models are gradually being implemented in hospital systems, and it is important to understand the strengths and limitations of these algorithms.