Elvis Ivan Seman

Prof. Dr. Elvis Ivan Seman


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2003 in The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESElvis Ivan Seman
Elvis Ivan Seman
JCJennifer R. Cook
Jennifer R. Cook
RORobert T. O'SHea
Robert T. O'SHea

1 March 2013 in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNicholas D. Bedford
Nicholas D. Bedford
ESElvis Ivan Seman
Elvis Ivan Seman
RORobert T. O’sHea
Robert T. O’sHea
MKMarc J.N.C. Keirse
Marc J.N.C. Keirse

1 July 2007 in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FBFariba Behnia-Willison
Fariba Behnia-Willison
ESElvis Ivan Seman
Elvis Ivan Seman
JCJennifer R. Cook
Jennifer R. Cook
RORobert T. O’shea
Robert T. O’shea
MKMarc J.N.C. Keirse
Marc J.N.C. Keirse

15 June 2010 in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RVRuben Vanspauwen
Ruben Vanspauwen
ESElvis Ivan Seman
Elvis Ivan Seman
PDPeter Dwyer
Peter Dwyer

15 January 2012 in Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASara Armitage
Sara Armitage
ESElvis Ivan Seman
Elvis Ivan Seman
MKMarc J. N. C. Keirse
Marc J. N. C. Keirse
Aim.To evaluate the anatomical success and complication rate of Surgisis in the repair of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse.Methods.A retrospective review of 65 consecutive Surgisis prolapse repairs, involving the anterior and/or posterior compartment, performed between 2003 and 2009, including their objective and subjective success rates using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system.Results.The subjective success rate (no symptoms and no bulge beyond the hymen) was 92%, and the overall objective success rate (no subsequent prolapse in any compartment) was 66% (43 of 65). The overall reoperation rate for de novo and recurrent prolapse was 7.7% with 3 women undergoing repeat surgery at the same site (anterior compartment). No long-term complications occurred.Conclusions.Surgisis has a definite role in the surgical treatment of prolapse. It may decrease recurrences seen with native tissue repair and long-term complications of synthetic mesh. Its use in posterior compartment repair in particular is promising.

11 March 2004 in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJennifer R. Cook
Jennifer R. Cook
RORobert T. O'Shea
Robert T. O'Shea
ESElvis Ivan Seman
Elvis Ivan Seman