Jacob D. Biamonte

Dr. Jacob D. Biamonte

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 143026, Russia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 September 2017 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jacob D. BiamonteJacob D. Biamonte
Jacob D. Biamonte
PWPeter Wittek
Peter Wittek
NPNicola Pancotti
Nicola Pancotti
PRPatrick Rebentrost
Patrick Rebentrost
NWNathan Wiebe
Nathan Wiebe
SLSeth Lloyd
Seth Lloyd

10 January 2010 in Nature Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BLB. P. Lanyon
B. P. Lanyon
JWJ. D. Whitfield
J. D. Whitfield
GGG. G. Gillett
G. G. Gillett
MGM. E. Goggin
M. E. Goggin
MAM. P. Almeida
M. P. Almeida
AWA. G. White
A. G. White

3 March 2011 in Molecular Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJames D. Whitfield
James D. Whitfield
Jacob D. BiamonteJacob D. Biamonte
Jacob D. Biamonte
AAAlán Aspuru-Guzik
Alán Aspuru-Guzik
Over the last century, a large number of physical and mathematical developments paired with rapidly advancing technology have allowed the field of quantum chemistry to advance dramatically. However, the lack of computationally efficient methods for the exact simulation of quantum systems on classical computers presents a limitation of current computational approaches. We report, in detail, how a set of pre-computed molecular integrals can be used to explicitly create a quantum circuit, i.e. a sequence of elementary quantum operations, that, when run on a quantum computer, obtains the energy of a molecular system with fixed nuclear geometry using the quantum phase estimation algorithm. We extend several known results related to this idea and discuss the adiabatic state preparation procedure for preparing the input states used in the algorithm. With current and near future quantum devices in mind, we provide a complete example using the hydrogen molecule of how a chemical Hamiltonian can be simulated using a quantum computer.

28 February 2014 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FDFlorian Dolde
Florian Dolde
VBVille Bergholm
Ville Bergholm
YWYa Wang
Ya Wang
IJIngmar Jakobi
Ingmar Jakobi
BNBoris Naydenov
Boris Naydenov
JWJörg Wrachtrup
Jörg Wrachtrup

28 July 2008 in Physical Review A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jacob D. BiamonteJacob D. Biamonte
Jacob D. Biamonte
PLPeter J. Love
Peter J. Love
It has been established that local lattice spin Hamiltonians can be used for universal adiabatic quantum computation. However, the two-local model Hamiltonians used in these proofs are general and hence do not limit the types of interactions required between spins. To address this concern, the present paper provides two simple model Hamiltonians that are of practical interest to experimentalists working toward the realization of a universal adiabatic quantum computer. The model Hamiltonians presented are the simplest known quantum-Merlin-Arthur-complete (QMA-complete) two-local Hamiltonians. The two-local Ising model with one-local transverse field which has been realized using an array of technologies, is perhaps the simplest quantum spin model but is unlikely to be universal for adiabatic quantum computation. We demonstrate that this model can be rendered universal and QMA-complete by adding a tunable two-local transverse σxσx coupling. We also show the universality and QMA-completeness of spin models with only one-local σz and σx fields and two-local σzσx interactions.

5 March 2020 in Physical Review Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VAV. Akshay
V. Akshay
HPH. Philathong
H. Philathong
MMM. E. S. Morales
M. E. S. Morales
Jacob D. BiamonteJacob D. Biamonte
Jacob D. Biamonte
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) has rapidly become a cornerstone of contemporary quantum algorithm development. Despite a growing range of applications, only a few results have been developed towards understanding the algorithm’s ultimate limitations. Here we report that QAOA exhibits a strong dependence on a problem instances constraint to variable ratio—this problem density places a limiting restriction on the algorithms capacity to minimize a corresponding objective function (and hence solve optimization problem instances). Such reachability deficits persist even in the absence of barren plateaus and are outside of the recently reported level-1 QAOA limitations. These findings are among the first to determine strong limitations on variational quantum approximate optimization.