Background: Previous preclinical and clinical research has investigated the role of intestinal microbiota in carcinogenesis. Growing evidence exists that intestinal microbiota can influence breast cancer carcinogenesis. However, the role of intestinal microbiota in breast cancer needs to be further investigated. This study aimed to identify the microbiota differences between postmenopausal breast cancer patients and controls. Patients and methods: This prospective cohort study compared the intestinal microbiota richness, diversity, and composition in postmenopausal histologically proven ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients and postmenopausal controls. Patients scheduled for (neo)adjuvant adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (AC), and docetaxel (D), or endocrine therapy (tamoxifen) were prospectively enrolled in a multicentre cohort study in the Netherlands. Patients collected a faecal sample and completed a questionnaire before starting systemic cancer treatment. Controls, enrolled from the National Dutch Breast Cancer Screening Programme, also collected a faecal sample and completed a questionnaire. Intestinal microbiota was analysed by amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4 gene region. Results: In total, 81 postmenopausal ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients and 67 postmenopausal controls were included, resulting in 148 faecal samples. Observed species richness, Shannon index, and overall microbial community structure were not significantly different between breast cancer patients and controls. There was a significant difference in overall microbial community structure between breast cancer patients scheduled for adjuvant treatment, neoadjuvant treatment, and controls at the phylum (p = 0.042) and genus levels (p = 0.015). Dialister (p = 0.001) and its corresponding family Veillonellaceae (p = 0.001) were higher in patients scheduled for adjuvant treatment, compared to patients scheduled for neoadjuvant treatment. Additional sensitivity analysis to correct for the potential confounding effect of prophylactic antibiotic use, indicated no differences in microbial community structure between patients scheduled for neoadjuvant systemic treatment, adjuvant systemic treatment, and controls at the phylum (p = 0.471) and genus levels (p = 0.124). Conclusions: Intestinal microbiota richness, diversity, and composition are not different between postmenopausal breast cancer patients and controls. The increased relative abundance of Dialister and Veillonellaceae was observed in breast cancer patients scheduled for adjuvant treatment, which might be caused by a relative decrease in other bacteria due to prophylactic antibiotic administration rather than an absolute increase.

This clinical study explored the associations between the intestinal microbiota, chemotherapy toxicity, and treatment response in postmenopausal oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer patients.Oestrogen receptor positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients were prospectively enroled in a multicentre cohort study and treated with 4 cycles of (neo)adjuvant adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by 4 cycles of docetaxel (D). Patients collected a faecal sample and completed a questionnaire before treatment, during AC, during D, and after completing AC-D. Chemotherapy toxicity and tumour response were determined. Intestinal microbiota was analysed by amplicon sequencing of the 16 S rRNA V4 gene-region. In total, 44 patients, including 18 neoadjuvant patients, were included, and 153 faecal samples were collected before AC-D (n = 44), during AC (n = 43), during D (n = 29), and after AC-D treatment (n = 37), 28 participants provided all four samples. In the whole group, observed species richness reduced during treatment (p = 0.042). The abundance of Proteobacteria, unclassified Enterobacterales, Lactobacillus, Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 group, Marvinbryantia, Christensenellaceae R7 group, and Ruminococcaceae UCG-005 changed significantly over time. Patients with any grade diarrhoea during docetaxel treatment had a significantly lower observed species richness compared to patients without diarrhoea. In the small group neoadjuvant treated patients, pathologic response was unrelated to baseline intestinal microbiota richness, diversity and composition. While the baseline microbiota was not predictive for pathologic response in a rather small group of neoadjuvant treated patients in our study, subsequent shifts in microbial richness, as well as the abundance of specific bacterial taxa, were observed during AC-D treatment in the whole group and the neoadjuvant group.

Introduction: The human gut microbiota influence critical functions including the metabolism of nutrients, xenobiotics, and drugs. Gut microbial β-glucuronidases (GUS) enzymes facilitate the removal of glucuronic acid from various compounds, potentially affecting anti-cancer drug efficacy and reactivating carcinogens. This review aims to comprehensively analyze and summarize studies on the role of gut microbial GUS in cancer and its interaction with anti-cancer treatments. Its goal is to collate and present insights that are directly relevant to patient care and treatment strategies in oncology. Methods: This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and focused on primary research exploring the role of GUS within the gut microbiota related to cancer etiology and anti-cancer treatment. Comprehensive literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Results: GUS activity was only investigated in colorectal cancer (CRC), revealing increased fecal GUS activity, variations in the gut microbial composition, and GUS-contributing bacterial taxa in CRC patients versus controls. Irinotecan affects gastrointestinal (GI) health by increasing GUS expression and shifting gut microbial composition, particularly by enhancing the presence of GUS-producing bacteria, correlating with irinotecan-induced GI toxicities. GUS inhibitors (GUSi) can mitigate irinotecan's adverse effects, protecting the intestinal barrier and reducing diarrhea. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first review to comprehensively analyze and summarize studies on the critical role of gut microbial GUS in cancer and anti-cancer treatment, particularly irinotecan. It underscores the potential of GUSi to reduce side effects and enhance treatment efficacy, highlighting the urgent need for further research to integrate GUS targeting into future anti-cancer treatment strategies.

Background: Gut bacteria-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) are considered to have beneficial metabolic, anti-inflammatory as well as anti-carcinogenic effects. Previous preclinical studies indicated bidirectional interactions between gut bacteria and the chemotherapeutic capecitabine or its metabolite 5-FU. This study investigated the effect of three cycles of capecitabine on fecal SCFA and BCFA levels and their associations with tumor response, nutritional status, physical performance, chemotherapy-induced toxicity, systemic inflammation and bacterial abundances in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods: Forty-four patients with metastatic or unresectable CRC, scheduled for treatment with capecitabine (± bevacizumab), were prospectively enrolled. Patients collected a fecal sample and completed a questionnaire before (T1), during (T2) and after (T3) three cycles of capecitabine. Tumor response (CT/MRI scans), nutritional status (MUST score), physical performance (Karnofsky Performance Score) and chemotherapy-induced toxicity (CTCAE) were recorded. Additional data on clinical characteristics, treatment regimen, medical history and blood inflammatory parameters were collected. Fecal SCFA and BCFA concentrations were determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Gut microbiota composition was assessed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.Results: Fecal levels of the SCFA valerate and caproate decreased significantly during three cycles of capecitabine. Furthermore, baseline levels of the BCFA iso-butyrate were associated with tumor response. Nutritional status, physical performance and chemotherapy-induced toxicity were not significantly associated with SCFA or BCFA. Baseline SCFA correlated positively with blood neutrophil counts. At all time points, we identified associations between SCFA and BCFA and the relative abundance of bacterial taxa on family level.Conclusions: The present study provided first indications for a potential role of SCFA and BCFA during capecitabine treatment as well as implications for further research.Trial registration: The current study was registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR6957) on 17/01/2018 and can be consulted via the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP).

Background: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is used as an antineoplastic agent in distinct cancer types. Increasing evidence suggests that the gut microbiota might modulate 5-FU efficacy and toxicity, potentially affecting the patient’s prognosis. The current experimental study investigated 5-FU-induced microbiota alterations, as well as the potential of prebiotic fibre mixtures (M1-M4) to counteract these shifts. Methods: A pooled microbial consortium was derived from ten healthy donors, inoculated in an in vitro model of the colon, and treated with 5-FU, with or without prebiotic fibre mixtures for 72 h. Four different prebiotic fibre mixtures were tested: M1 containing short-chain galacto-oligosaccharides (sc GOS), long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (lcFOS), and low viscosity pectin (lvPect), M2 consisting of arabinoxylan, beta-glucan, pectin, and resistant starch, M3 which was a mixture of scGOS and lcFOS, and M4 containing arabinoxylan, beta-glucan, pectin, resistant starch, and inulin. Results: We identified 5-FU-induced changes in gut microbiota composition, but not in microbial diversity. Administration of prebiotic fibre mixtures during 5-FU influenced gut microbiota composition and taxa abundance. Amongst others, prebiotic fibre mixtures successfully stimulated potentially beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Anaerostipes, Weissella, Olsenella, Senegalimassilia) and suppressed the growth of potentially pathogenic bacteria (Klebsiella, Enterobacter) in the presence of 5-FU. The short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) acetate increased slightly during 5-FU, but even more during 5-FU with prebiotic fibre mixtures, while propionate was lower due to 5-FU with or without prebiotic fibre mixtures, compared to control. The SCFA butyrate and valerate did not show differences among all conditions. The branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) iso-butyrate and iso-valerate were higher in 5-FU, but lower in 5-FU + prebiotics, compared to control. Conclusions: These data suggest that prebiotic fibre mixtures represent a promising strategy to modulate 5-FU-induced microbial dysbiosis towards a more favourable microbiota, thereby possibly improving 5-FU efficacy and reducing toxicity, which should be evaluated further in clinical studies.

Tamoxifen is essential in treating estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, primarily through its active metabolite, endoxifen. Emerging research suggests potential interactions between tamoxifen and gut microbiota. This study investigates the effects of tamoxifen on gut microbiota composition in postmenopausal ER+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2−) breast cancer patients and explores correlations between gut microbiota and endoxifen plasma levels. This prospective observational study included postmenopausal ER+/HER2− breast cancer patients. Fecal and blood samples were collected before and during 6–12 weeks of tamoxifen therapy. Gut microbiota composition was analyzed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of the hypervariable V4 gene region, and plasma endoxifen levels were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Changes in microbial diversity and composition were assessed, with correlations to endoxifen levels. A total of 62 patients were included. Tamoxifen significantly increased microbial richness (p = 0.019), although overall community structure remained consistent between pre- and during-treatment samples. Notable changes were observed in specific microbial taxa, with significant increases in genera such as Blautia (p_adjusted = 0.003) and Streptococcus (p_adjusted = 0.010), and decreases in Prevotella_9 (p_adjusted = 0.006). No significant correlations between gut microbiota and endoxifen levels were identified after multiple comparisons. Tamoxifen therapy increases gut microbial diversity in postmenopausal ER+/HER2− breast cancer patients, though overall microbial community structure remains stable. The absence of significant correlations with endoxifen levels suggests that while tamoxifen affects the gut microbiota, its role in endoxifen metabolism requires further study. More comprehensive research is needed to understand the relationship between tamoxifen, gut microbiota, and therapeutic outcomes.