Markus Mueller

Dr. Markus Mueller

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2012 in Renewable Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GLGUANG LI
GUANG LI
GWGeorge Weiss
George Weiss
MMMarkus Mueller
Markus Mueller
STStuart Townley
Stuart Townley
MBMike R. Belmont
Mike R. Belmont

1 March 2013 in Systems & Control Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BRBjörn S. Rüffer
Björn S. Rüffer
NWNathan van de Wouw
Nathan van de Wouw
MMMarkus Mueller
Markus Mueller

1 January 2013 in SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Christoph Michael HacklChristoph Michael Hackl
Christoph Michael Hackl
NHNorman Hopfe
Norman Hopfe
AIAchim Ilchmann
Achim Ilchmann
MMMarkus Mueller
Markus Mueller
STStephan Trenn
Stephan Trenn
Tracking of reference signals $y_{\mathrm{ref}}(\cdot)$ by the output $y(\cdot)$ of linear (as well as a considerably large class of nonlinear) single-input, single-output systems is considered. The system is assumed to have strict relative degree two with (weakly) stable zero dynamics. The control objective is tracking of the error $e=y-y_{\mathrm{ref}}$ and its derivative $\dot{e}$ within two prespecified performance funnels, respectively. This is achieved by the so-called funnel controller $u(t)=-k_0(t)^2e(t)-k_1(t)\dot{e}(t)$, where the simple proportional error feedback has gain functions $k_0$ and $k_1$ designed in such a way to preclude contact of $e$ and $\dot{e}$ with the funnel boundaries, respectively. The funnel controller also ensures boundedness of all signals. We also show that the same funnel controller (i) is applicable to relative degree one systems, (ii) allows for input constraints provided a feasibility condition (formulated in terms of the system data, the saturation bounds, the funnel data, bounds on the reference signal, and the initial state) holds, (iii) is robust in terms of the gap metric: if a system is sufficiently close to a system with relative degree two, stable zero dynamics, and positive high-frequency gain, but does not necessarily have these properties, then for small initial values the funnel controller also achieves the control objective. Finally, we illustrate the theoretical results by experimental results: the funnel controller is applied to a rotatory mechanical system for position control.

1 January 2022 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TMTamaryn Menneer
Tamaryn Menneer
MMMarkus Mueller
Markus Mueller
RSRichard A. Sharpe
Richard A. Sharpe
STStuart Townley
Stuart Townley

1 February 2009 in Linear Algebra and its Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MMMarkus Mueller
Markus Mueller

15 May 2007 in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AIAchim Ilchmann
Achim Ilchmann
MMMarkus Mueller
Markus Mueller
We define the relative degree of time-varying linear systems, show that it coincides with Isidori's and with Liberzon/Morse/Sontag's definition if the system is understood as a time-invariant nonlinear system, characterize it in terms of the system data and their derivatives, derive a normal form with respect to a time-varying linear coordinate transformation, and finally characterize the zero dynamics