Background— Cardiac arrest without evident cardiac disease may be caused by subclinical genetic conditions. Provocative testing to unmask a phenotype is often necessary to detect primary electrical disease, direct genetic testing, and perform family screening. Methods and Results— Patients with apparently unexplained cardiac arrest and no evident cardiac disease (normal cardiac function on echocardiogram, no evidence of coronary artery disease, and a normal ECG) underwent systematic evaluation that included cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, signal-averaged ECG, exercise testing, drug challenge, and selective electrophysiological testing. Diagnostic criteria were based on accepted criteria or provocation of the characteristic clinical features for long-QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, Brugada syndrome, early repolarization, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, coronary spasm, and myocarditis. Sixty-three patients in 9 centers were enrolled (age 43.0±13.4 years, 29 women). A diagnosis was obtained in 35 patients (56%): Long-QT syndrome in 8, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in 8, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy in 6, early repolarization in 5, coronary spasm in 4, Brugada syndrome in 3, and myocarditis in 1. Targeted genetic testing demonstrated evidence of causative mutations in 9 (47%) of 19 patients. Screening of 64 family members of these patients identified 15 affected individuals who were treated (24%). The remaining 28 patients (44%) were considered to have idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Conclusions— Systematic clinical testing, including drug provocation and advanced imaging, results in unmasking of the cause of apparently unexplained cardiac arrest in >50% of patients. This approach assists in directing genetic testing to diagnose genetically mediated arrhythmia syndromes, which results in successful family screening.

Background—: Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia is an uncommon, potentially lethal, ion channelopathy. Standard therapies have high failure rates and little is known about treatment in children. Newer options such as flecainide and left cardiac sympathetic denervation are not well validated. We sought to define treatment outcomes in children with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Methods and Results—: This is a Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society multicenter, retrospective cohort study of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia patients diagnosed before 19 years of age. The cohort included 226 patients, including 170 probands and 56 relatives. Symptomatic presentation was reported in 176 (78%). Symptom onset occurred at 10.8 (interquartile range, 6.8–13.2) years with a delay to diagnosis of 0.5 (0–2.6) years. Syncope ( P <0.001), cardiac arrest ( P <0.001), and treatment failure ( P =0.008) occurred more often in probands. β-Blockers were prescribed in 205 of 211 patients (97%) on medication, and 25% experienced at least 1 treatment failure event. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators were placed in 121 (54%) and was associated with electrical storm in 22 (18%). Flecainide was used in 24% and left cardiac sympathetic denervation in 8%. Six deaths (3%) occurred during a cumulative follow-up of 788 patient-years. Conclusions—: This study demonstrates a malignant phenotype and lengthy delay to diagnosis in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Probands were typically severely affected. β-Blockers were almost universally initiated; however, treatment failure, noncompliance and subtherapeutic dosing were often reported. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators were common despite numerous device-related complications. Treatment failure was rare in the quarter of patients on flecainide. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation was not uncommon although the indication was variable.