Heinz Rothgang

Dr. Heinz Rothgang

1. Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2013 in Health Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBKatharina Böhm
Katharina Böhm
ASAchim Schmid
Achim Schmid
RGRalf Götze
Ralf Götze
CLClaudia Landwehr
Claudia Landwehr
HRHeinz Rothgang
Heinz Rothgang

18 January 2009 in Social Policy & Administration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CWClaus Wendt
Claus Wendt
LFLorraine Frisina
Lorraine Frisina
HRHeinz Rothgang
Heinz Rothgang

20 June 2019 in BMC Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKTobias Krick
Tobias Krick
KHKai Huter
Kai Huter
DDDominik Domhoff
Dominik Domhoff
ASAnnika Schmidt
Annika Schmidt
HRHeinz Rothgang
Heinz Rothgang
KWKarin Wolf-Ostermann
Karin Wolf-Ostermann
The existence, usage and benefits of digital technologies in nursing care are relevant topics in the light of the current discussion on technologies as possible solutions to problems such as the shortage of skilled workers and the increasing demand for long-term care. A lack of good empirical overviews of existing technologies in the present literature prompted us to conduct this review. Its purpose was to map the field of digital technologies for informal and formal care that have already been explored in terms of acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency (AEE), and to show the scope of the used methods, target settings, target groups and fields of support. A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies, GeroLit and CareLit. In addition, project websites were manually screened for relevant publications. Seven hundred fifteen papers were included in the review. Effectiveness studies have been most frequently performed for ICT, robots and sensors. Acceptance studies often focussed on ICT, robots and EHR/EMR. Efficiency studies were generally rare. Many studies were found to have a low level of evidence. Experimental designs with small numbers and without control groups were the most common methods used to evaluate acceptance and effectiveness. Study designs with high evidence levels were most commonly found for ICT, robots and e-learning. Technologies evaluated for informal caregivers and children or indicated for formal care at home or in cross-sectoral care were rare. We recommend producing high-quality evaluations on existing digital technologies for AEE in real-life settings rather than systematic reviews with low-quality studies. More focus should be placed on research into efficiency. Future research should be devoted to a closer examination of the applied AEE evaluation methods. Policymakers should provide funding to enable large-scale, long-term evaluations of technologies in the practice of care, filling the research gaps for technologies, target settings and target groups identified in this review.

1 December 2020 in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KHKai Huter
Kai Huter
TKTobias Krick
Tobias Krick
DDDominik Domhoff
Dominik Domhoff
KSKathrin Seibert
Kathrin Seibert
KWKarin Wolf-Ostermann
Karin Wolf-Ostermann
HRHeinz Rothgang
Heinz Rothgang
Background: The field of digital technologies being developed or applied to support nursing care is extensive. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview on technologies for which results on positive or negative effects on persons in need of care, caregivers or care institutions are available and to appraise the reliability of these results. Methods: A scoping review design has been used to identify studies focussing on the effectiveness of digital technologies in nursing care for persons in need of care, caregivers or care institutions. The screening process included 19,510 scientific publications from 9 databases. Results: A total of 123 single studies and 31 reviews were subjected to the analysis. The included technologies comprise nursing and health information technologies, such as assistive devices, information and communication technologies, sensors and robotics. The results show that there are many studies that demonstrate positive effects, but the level of evidence is mostly low and study sizes are often small. Hardly any technology has been researched intensively enough to produce conclusive results. Studies on a high level of evidence (RCTs) lack for most technological areas. Heterogeneous results in some areas indicate that effects may depend strongly on the mode and specific context into which the technologies are introduced. Conclusion: Due to the limited evidence on effectiveness of digital technologies in nursing care, it is not surprising that care institutions are reluctant to put innovative technologies into practice. The scoping review indicates technology areas that should be subject to future research with higher quality studies. Research on outpatient, informal and cross-sectoral care should be intensified to further exploit the potential of digital technologies with a view to improving independence of care-recipients and unburdening formal and informal carers.

8 July 2010 in Social Policy & Administration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HRHeinz Rothgang
Heinz Rothgang

27 February 2006 in Ageing and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAdelina Comas-Herrera
Adelina Comas-Herrera
RWRaphael Wittenberg
Raphael Wittenberg
Joan Costa-FontJoan Costa-Font
Joan Costa-Font
CGCristiano Gori
Cristiano Gori
AMAlessandra DI Maio
Alessandra DI Maio
HRHeinz Rothgang
Heinz Rothgang
This paper reports findings from a European Commission funded study of future long-term care expenditure in Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom, and presents projections of future long-term care expenditure in the four countries under a number of assumptions about the future. Macro-simulation (or cell-based) models were used to make comparable projections based on a set of common assumptions. A central base-case served as a point of comparison by which to explore the sensitivity of the models to alternative scenarios for the key determinants. The sensitivity of the models to variant assumptions about the future numbers of older people, the prevalence of functional dependency and informal care, patterns of long-term provision, and macroeconomic conditions are examined. It was found that, under the base-case, the proportion of gross domestic product spent on long-term care is projected to more than double between 2000 and 2050 in each country. The projected future demand for long-term care services for older people is sensitive to assumptions about the future number of older people, the prevalence of dependency and the availability of informal care, and projected expenditure is sensitive to assumptions about rises in the real unit-costs of services and the structure of the models. It is important, for planning purposes, to recognise the considerable uncertainty about future levels of long-term care expenditure.