Periostin is known to be a useful biomarker for various diseases. In this article, we focus on allergic diseases and pulmonary fibrosis, for which we and others are now developing detection systems for periostin as a biomarker. Biomarker-based precision medicine in the management of type 2 inflammation and fibrotic diseases since heterogeneity is of utmost importance. Periostin expression is induced by type 2 cytokines (interleukin-4/-13) or transforming growth factor-β, and plays a vital role in the pathogenesis of allergic inflammation or interstitial lung disease, respectively, andits serum levels are correlated disease severity, prognosis and responsiveness to the treatment. We first summarise the importance of type 2 biomarker and then describe the pathological role of periostin in the development and progression of type 2 allergic inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis. In addition, then, we summarise the recent development of assay methods for periostin detection, and analyse the diseases in which periostin concentration is elevated in serum and local biological fluids and its usefulness as a biomarker. Furthermore, we describe recent findings of periostin as a biomarker in the use of biologics or anti-fibrotic therapy. Finally, we describe the factors that influence the change in periostin concentration under the healthy conditions.

Periostin is induced by IL-13 and has been studied as a biomarker of asthma. The present study explored the relationship between serum levels of periostin and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in asthmatic children. The study population consisted of 86 children 6-15 years old divided into an asthmatic group (n = 56) and healthy controls (n = 30). We measured the levels of periostin in serum and performed pulmonary function tests including baseline measurements, post-bronchodilator inhalation tests, exercise bronchial provocation tests (BPTs), and mannitol BPTs. The 56 asthmatic children were divided into four groups: asthmatics with positive exercise BPT and positive mannitol BPT (n = 30), asthmatics with positive exercise BPT but negative mannitol BPT (n = 7), asthmatics with negative exercise BPT but positive mannitol BPT (n = 10), and asthmatics with negative exercise BPT and negative mannitol BPT (n = 9). Serum levels of periostin in asthmatic children with both positive exercise and mannitol BPT were significantly greater than those in asthmatic children with both negative exercise and mannitol BPT (95.0 [75.0-104.0] vs. 79.0 [68.0-82.5] ng/mL, P = 0.008) and controls (74.0 [69.75-80.0] ng/mL, P < 0.001). Periostin levels were significantly correlated with both the maximum decrease in %FEV1 and mannitol PD15 value. Serum levels of periostin in asthmatic children with both positive exercise and mannitol BPT were significantly greater than those in asthmatic children with both negative exercise and mannitol BPT and also greater than in healthy controls.

Background: Antifibrotic agents have been approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of familial IPF (FIPF) has not been previously reported. Case presentation: We report the case of a 77-year-old man with FIPF, successfully treated with pirfenidone. His uncle died due to IPF, and his niece was diagnosed with the disease. He had worsening dyspnea two months prior to admission to our hospital. Upon admission, he had desaturation when exercising and broad interstitial pneumonia. Administration of pirfenidone improved his dyspnea, desaturation, and the reticular shadow on his chest radiograph. Increased fibrotic marker levels KL-6 and SP-D were also normalized in six months; treatment had no effect on his serum periostin level. Pirfenidone has been effective for over two years. Conclusion: Antifibrotic agents such as pirfenidone may be useful for the management of FIPF, as well as cases of sporadic IPF.