Yize Zhang

Dr. Yize Zhang

Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences,200030 Shanghai, China

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Yize ZhangYize Zhang
Yize Zhang
Nobuaki KuboNobuaki Kubo
Nobuaki Kubo
Junping ChenJunping Chen
Junping Chen
JWJiexian Wang
Jiexian Wang
HWHu Wang
Hu Wang
With the official announcement of open service since the end of 2018, the BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS) has started to provide global positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) services. Thus, it is worth assessing the positioning service of new BDS satellites and signals. In this paper, we comprehensively assess the system status and the global positioning performance of BDS regarding single point positioning (SPP) and real-time kinematic (RTK) performance. Results show that the signal in space range error (SISRE) of BDS-3 satellites is superior to that of BDS-2 satellites, showing an overall accuracy of 0.71 m versus 0.97 m, which is competitive with GPS and Galileo. With the contribution of BDS-3, the number of global average visible satellites has increased from 5.1 to 10.7, which provides a mean global position dilution of precision (PDOP) value better than 6 at 99.88% and the mean availability of basic PNT performance is also improved from 35.25% to 98.84%. One week of statistical results from 54 globally distributed international GNSS service (IGS) stations show that the root mean square (RMS) of SPP accuracy is 1.1 m in horizontal and 2.2 m in vertical, which is at the same level of GPS. The new B1c and B2a signals show a smaller observation noise than B1I, and SPP performance of B1c is similar to that of B1I. However, the positioning precision is slightly worse at the B2a frequency, which may be due to the inaccurate BDS ionosphere correction. As for short baseline RTK, baseline accuracy is also improved due to the increased number of new BDS satellites.

1 June 2020 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Yize ZhangYize Zhang
Yize Zhang
JCJunping Chen
Junping Chen
XGXiuqiang Gong
Xiuqiang Gong
QCQian Chen
Qian Chen

2 January 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Junping ChenJunping Chen
Junping Chen
JWJungang Wang
Jungang Wang
AWAHao Wang
AHao Wang
JDJunsheng Ding
Junsheng Ding
Yize ZhangYize Zhang
Yize Zhang
A regional zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) empirical model, referred to as SHAtropE (SHanghai Astronomical observatory tropospheric delay model—Extended), is developed and provides tropospheric propagation delay corrections for users in China and the surrounding areas with improved accuracy. The SHAtropE model was developed based on the ZTD time series of the continuous GNSS sites from the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) and GNSS sites of surrounding areas. It combines the exponential and periodical functions and is provided as regional grids with a resolution of 2.5° × 2.0° in longitude and latitude. At each grid point, the exponential function converts the ZTD from the site height to the ellipsoid, and the periodical terms, including both annual and semi-annual periods, describe ZTD’s temporal variation. Moreover, SHAtropE also provides the predicted ZTD uncertainty, which is valuable in Precise Point Positioning (PPP) with ZTD being constrained for faster convergence. The data of 310 GNSS sites over 7 years were used to validate the new model. Results show that the SHAtropE ZTD has an accuracy of 3.5 cm in root mean square (RMS) quantity, which has a mean improvement of 35.2% and 5.4% over the UNB3m (5.4 cm) and GPT3 (3.7 cm) models, respectively. The predicted uncertainty of SHAtropE ZTD shows seasonal variations, where the values are larger in summer than in winter. By applying the SHAtropE model in the static PPP, the convergence time of GPS-only and BDS-only solutions are reduced by 8.1% and 14.5% respectively compared to the UNB3m model, and the reductions are 6.9% and 11.2% respectively for the GPT3 model. As no meteorological data are required for the implementation of the model, the SHAtropE could thus be a refined tropospheric model for GNSS users in mainland China and the surrounding areas. The method of modeling the ZTD uncertainty can also be used in further global tropospheric delay modeling.

2 January 2023 in GPS Solutions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJunsheng Ding
Junsheng Ding
Junping ChenJunping Chen
Junping Chen
JWJungang Wang
Jungang Wang
Yize ZhangYize Zhang
Yize Zhang
Numerical weather models (NWMs) are important data sources for space geodetic techniques. Additionally, the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) provides many observations to continuously improve and enhance the NWM. Existing comparative analysis experiments on NWM tropospheric and GNSS tropospheric delays suffer from being conducted in highly specific regions with limited spatial coverage; furthermore, the length of time for the experiment is too short for analyzing seasonal characteristics, and the insufficient number of stations limits spatial density, making it difficult to obtain the equipment-dependent distribution characteristics. After strict quality control and data preprocessing, we have calculated and compared the bias and standard deviation of tropospheric delay for approximately 7000 selected Nevada Geodetic Laboratory (NGL) GNSS stations in 2020 with the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) hourly ray-traced tropospheric delay for the same group of stations. Characterizations in time, space, and linkage to receivers and antennas reveal positive biases of approximately 4 mm in the NGL zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) relative to the NWM ZTD over most of the globe; moreover, there is a seasonal amplitude reaching 6 mm in the bias, and an antenna-related mean bias of approximately 1.6 mm in the NGL tropospheric delay. The obtained results can be used to provide a priori tropospheric delays with appropriate uncertainties; additionally, they can be applied to assess the suitability of using NWMs for real-time positioning solutions.

28 February 2022 in Satellite Navigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Junping ChenJunping Chen
Junping Chen
Yize ZhangYize Zhang
Yize Zhang
CYChao Yu
Chao Yu
AWAhao Wang
Ahao Wang
ZSZiyuan Song
Ziyuan Song
JZJianhua Zhou
Jianhua Zhou
Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS) is one of the services provided by the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS). It broadcasts four types of differential corrections to improve user application performance. These corrections include the State Space Representation (SSR) based satellite orbit/clock corrections and ionospheric grid corrections, and the Observation Space Representation (OSR) based partition comprehensive corrections. The algorithms generating these SBAS corrections are not introduced in previous researches, and the user SBAS positioning performance with the contribution of BDS-3 has not been evaluated. In this paper, we present the BDS SBAS algorithms for these differential corrections in detail. Four types of Precise Point Positioning (PPP) function models for BDS Dual-Frequency (DF) and Single-Frequency (SF) users using the OSR and SSR parameters are also proposed. One week of data in 2020 is collected at 20 reference stations including the observations of both BeiDou-2 Navigation Satellite System (BDS-2) and BeiDou-3 Navigation Satellite System (BDS-3) satellites, and the PPP under various scenarios are performed using all the datasets and the BDS SBAS broadcast corrections. The results show that the performance of BDS-2/BDS-3 combination is superior to that of BDS-2 only constellation. The positioning errors in Root Mean Square (RMS) for the static DF PPP are better than 8 cm/15 cm in horizontal/vertical directions, while for the static SF PPP are 11 cm/24 cm. In the scenarios of simulated kinematic PPP, three Dimension (3D) positioning errors can reach 0.5 m in less than 10 min for the DF PPP and 30 min for the SF PPP, and the RMSs of the DF and SF PPP are better than 17 cm/21 cm and 20 cm/32 cm in horizontal/vertical directions. In a real-time single- and dual-frequency kinematic positioning test, the positioning errors of all three components can reach 0.5 m within 30 min, and the positioning accuracy after solution convergence in the N, E and U directions is better than 0.3 m.

17 December 2019 in GPS Solutions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Yize ZhangYize Zhang
Yize Zhang
Nobuaki KuboNobuaki Kubo
Nobuaki Kubo
Junping ChenJunping Chen
Junping Chen
FCFeng-Yu Chu
Feng-Yu Chu
AWAhao Wang
Ahao Wang
JWJiexian Wang
Jiexian Wang