Theresa Schölderle

Dr. Theresa Schölderle

Institute of Phonetics and Speech Processing, University of Munich, Munich 80539, Germany

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2016 in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTheresa Schölderle
Theresa Schölderle
ASAnja Staiger
Anja Staiger
RLRenée Lampe
Renée Lampe
KSKatrin Strecker
Katrin Strecker
WZWolfram Ziegler
Wolfram Ziegler
Purpose Although dysarthria affects the large majority of individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) and can substantially complicate everyday communication, previous research has provided an incomplete picture of its clinical features. We aimed to comprehensively describe characteristics of dysarthria in adults with CP and to elucidate the impact of dysarthric symptoms on parameters relevant for communication. Method Forty-two adults with CP underwent speech assessment by means of standardized auditory rating scales. Listening experiments were conducted to obtain communication-related parameters—that is, intelligibility and naturalness—as well as age and gender estimates. Results The majority of adults with CP showed moderate to severe dysarthria with symptoms on all dimensions of speech, most prominently voice quality, respiration, and prosody. Regression analyses revealed that articulatory, respiratory, and prosodic features were the strongest predictors of intelligibility and naturalness of speech. Listeners' estimates of the speakers' age and gender were predominantly determined by voice parameters. Conclusion This study provides an overview on the clinical presentation of dysarthria in a convenience sample of adults with CP. The complexity of the functional impairment described and the consequences on the individuals' communication call for a stronger consideration of dysarthria in CP both in clinical care and in research.

1 July 2021 in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TSTheresa Schölderle
Theresa Schölderle
EHElisabet Haas
Elisabet Haas
SBStefanie Baumeister
Stefanie Baumeister
WZWolfram Ziegler
Wolfram Ziegler
Purpose: This article describes the developmental trajectories of four communication-related parameters (i.e., intelligibility, articulation rate, fluency, and communicative efficiency) in a cross-sectional study of typically developing children between 3 and 9 years. The four target parameters were related to auditory-perceptual parameters of speech function. Method: One hundred forty-four typically developing children (ages 3; 0-9;11 [years; months]; 72 girls and 72 boys) participated. Speech samples were collected using the materials of the Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales for Childhood Dysarthria, a German assessment tool for childhood dysarthria, and analyzed following established auditory-perceptual criteria on relevant speech functions. To assess intelligibility, naive listeners transcribed sentences repeated by the children. Articulation rate and fluency were measured by acoustic analyses; communicative efficiency was determined by multiplying the proportion of correctly transcribed syllables by speech rate. Results: Intelligibility showed a steep developmental trajectory, with the majority of children obtaining a proportion Articulation rate demonstrated a flatter trajectory, with high variability still within the older children. Disfluencies, on the contrary, occurred only in the youngest children. By definition, communicative efficiency shared the characteristics of intelligibility and rate curves. A principal component analysis revealed, among other findings, strong connections between intelligibility and articulation, as well as between communicative efficiency, articulation, and rate measures. Conclusions: While children speak intelligibly, in terms of the applied assessment, at a comparably young age, other communication-relevant parameters show a slower developmental progress. Knowledge on the typical development of communication-related parameters and on their complex relationships with functional speech variables is crucial for the clinical assessment of childhood dysarthria.

24 September 2020 in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTheresa Schölderle
Theresa Schölderle
EHElisabet Haas
Elisabet Haas
WZWolfram Ziegler
Wolfram Ziegler
Aim: To investigate whether dysarthria syndromes acquired in adulthood can also be observed in children with cerebral palsy (CP) and, if so, whether they align with children’s CP subtypes.Method: Twenty‐six children with CP participated (mean age 7y 8mo [SD 1y 2mo], 5y 1mo–9y 10mo; 16 males and 10 females). Speech samples were elicited in a computer‐based game and were analysed using the auditory perceptual criteria of the Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales (BoDyS). For statistical classification, three comparison groups of adults with standard dysarthria syndromes (i.e. spastic, hyperkinetic, and ataxic) were used. Their BoDyS data were entered into a mixture discriminant analysis, with data from the comparison groups as the training sample and those from the children with CP as the test sample. Results were related to findings in a group of adults with CP.Results: Among the children with CP, most had spastic (n=14), while fewer had ataxic (n=9) or hyperkinetic (n=3), dysarthria. However, syndrome allocations were significantly more ambiguous than in adults with CP. For 11 children, their dysarthria syndromes did not align with their CP subtype.Interpretation: Dysarthria syndromes are less clear cut in children than in adults with CP because of a number of developmental factors.What this paper adds: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) show diverse patterns of dysarthric symptoms. Dysarthria syndromes do not seem to manifest fully during childhood. Dysarthria syndrome and CP subtype may not align in children with CP.

7 January 2023 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WZWolfram Ziegler
Wolfram Ziegler
TSTheresa Schölderle
Theresa Schölderle
BBBettina Brendel
Bettina Brendel
VRVerena Risch
Verena Risch
SFStefanie Felber
Stefanie Felber
ASAnja Staiger
Anja Staiger
Nonspeech (or paraspeech) parameters are widely used in clinical assessment of speech impairment in persons with dysarthria (PWD). Virtually every standard clinical instrument used in dysarthria diagnostics includes nonspeech parameters, often in considerable numbers. While theoretical considerations have challenged the validity of these measures as markers of speech impairment, only a few studies have directly examined their relationship to speech parameters on a broader scale. This study was designed to investigate how nonspeech parameters commonly used in clinical dysarthria assessment relate to speech characteristics of dysarthria in individuals with movement disorders. Maximum syllable repetition rates, accuracies, and rates of isolated and repetitive nonspeech oral–facial movements and maximum phonation times were compared with auditory–perceptual and acoustic speech parameters. Overall, 23 diagnostic parameters were assessed in a sample of 130 patients with movement disorders of six etiologies. Each variable was standardized for its distribution and for age and sex effects in 130 neurotypical speakers. Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to examine the factor structure underlying the diagnostic parameters. In the first analysis, we tested the hypothesis that nonspeech parameters combine with speech parameters within diagnostic dimensions representing domain–general motor control principles. In a second analysis, we tested the more specific hypotheses that diagnostic parameters split along effector (lip vs. tongue) or functional (speed vs. accuracy) rather than task boundaries. Our findings contradict the view that nonspeech parameters currently used in dysarthria diagnostics are congruent with diagnostic measures of speech characteristics in PWD.

11 May 2021 in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EHElisabet Haas
Elisabet Haas
WZWolfram Ziegler
Wolfram Ziegler
TSTheresa Schölderle
Theresa Schölderle
Purpose: The aim of this longitudinal study was to describe developmental courses of childhood dysarthria against the background of typical speech motor development by collecting auditory-perceptual data. Method: Fourteen children (four girls, 10 boys; 5;1–8;4 [years;months] at Time 1) with neurological conditions (CNC) and 14 typically developing children (CTD) matched for age and gender were assessed at three points in time over an 18-month period. Speech samples were collected using the Bogenhausener Dysarthrie Skalen–Kindliche Dysarthrien (BoDyS-KiD; in English: Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales–Childhood Dysarthria), a German tool for the assessment of childhood dysarthria, and analyzed by means of nine perceptual scales covering all clinically relevant speech components. Age normalization was performed according to a method published recently. Data from the matched controls were used to estimate whether the gradients of the CNC group's developmental trajectories exceeded those of typical development. Results: The children with neurological conditions presented heterogeneous speech profiles with a wide range of severity. At the group level, relatively stable trajectories of the age-normalized dysarthria total score were found over the observation period. The nine perceptual scales showed more or less parallel developments. All patients except two followed the growth curve describing the developmental course of the typically developing children. Conclusions: Most children took advantage of the developmental dynamics as they developed parallel to the age norm. With its comprehensive description of the developmental courses of 14 children with neurological conditions, this study may contribute to a more valid, statistically verified clinical assessment of the course of childhood dysarthria.

22 May 2019 in Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSTheresa Schölderle
Theresa Schölderle
ASAnja Staiger
Anja Staiger
BSBarbara Schumacher
Barbara Schumacher
WZWolfram Ziegler
Wolfram Ziegler
Objective: This study investigated laypersons’ attitudes towards adults with dysarthria due to cerebral palsy (CP). We aimed to explore the impact of the overall severity and of specific symptoms of dysarthria on laypersons’ evaluations. Patients and Methods: Eighteen adults with dysarthria due to CP and 6 nondysarthric controls participated as speakers. The individuals with CP underwent dysarthria assessment based on a standardized tool. The results were compared to those of a listening experiment with 20 laypersons. A text passage spoken by all speakers was presented to the listeners, who provided their evaluations using rating scales specifically developed for this study. The tool addressed 3 dimensions of attitudes: (1) estimation of a speaker’s cognitive-linguistic abilities; (2) attribution of personality and social characteristics, and (3) listeners’ emotions and behavioral tendencies towards the speaker. Results: Severity of dysarthria was strongly correlated with the overall attitudes. Regression analyses identified different symptoms as predictors of the listeners’ judgements. Conclusion: Severity of dysarthria seems to have a major impact on laypersons’ attitudes. Results suggest that speech symptoms may have a very specific influence on laypersons’ evaluations. This may be important for clinical care, since symptoms with the most negative impact should be focused on in treatment.