Gerald Jerome

Dr. Gerald Jerome

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 February 2004 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCStanley J. Colcombe
Stanley J. Colcombe
AKArt Kramer
Art Kramer
KEKirk I. Erickson
Kirk I. Erickson
PSPaige Scalf
Paige Scalf
EMEdward McAuley
Edward McAuley
SESteriani Elavsky
Steriani Elavsky
Cardiovascular fitness is thought to offset declines in cognitive performance, but little is known about the cortical mechanisms that underlie these changes in humans. Research using animal models shows that aerobic training increases cortical capillary supplies, the number of synaptic connections, and the development of new neurons. The end result is a brain that is more efficient, plastic, and adaptive, which translates into better performance in aging animals. Here, in two separate experiments, we demonstrate for the first time to our knowledge, in humans that increases in cardiovascular fitness results in increased functioning of key aspects of the attentional network of the brain during a cognitively challenging task. Specifically, highly fit (Study 1) or aerobically trained (Study 2) persons show greater task-related activity in regions of the prefrontal and parietal cortices that are involved in spatial selection and inhibitory functioning, when compared with low-fit (Study 1) or nonaerobic control (Study 2) participants. Additionally, in both studies there exist groupwise differences in activation of the anterior cingulate cortex, which is thought to monitor for conflict in the attentional system, and signal the need for adaptation in the attentional network. These data suggest that increased cardiovascular fitness can affect improvements in the plasticity of the aging human brain, and may serve to reduce both biological and cognitive senescence in humans.

24 November 2011 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LALawrence Appel
Lawrence Appel
JCJeanne M. Clark
Jeanne M. Clark
HYHsin-Chieh Yeh
Hsin-Chieh Yeh
NWNae-Yuh Wang
Nae-Yuh Wang
JCJanelle W. Coughlin
Janelle W. Coughlin
FBFrederick L. Brancati
Frederick L. Brancati
Obesity and its cardiovascular complications are extremely common medical problems, but evidence on how to accomplish weight loss in clinical practice is sparse. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to examine the effects of two behavioral weight-loss interventions in 415 obese patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were recruited from six primary care practices; 63.6% were women, 41.0% were black, and the mean age was 54.0 years. One intervention provided patients with weight-loss support remotely — through the telephone, a study-specific Web site, and e-mail. The other intervention provided in-person support during group and individual sessions, along with the three remote means of support. There was also a control group in which weight loss was self-directed. Outcomes were compared between each intervention group and the control group and between the two intervention groups. For both interventions, primary care providers reinforced participation at routinely scheduled visits. The trial duration was 24 months. At baseline, the mean body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) for all participants was 36.6, and the mean weight was 103.8 kg. At 24 months, the mean change in weight from baseline was −0.8 kg in the control group, −4.6 kg in the group receiving remote support only (P<0.001 for the comparison with the control group), and −5.1 kg in the group receiving in-person support (P<0.001 for the comparison with the control group). The percentage of participants who lost 5% or more of their initial weight was 18.8% in the control group, 38.2% in the group receiving remote support only, and 41.4% in the group receiving in-person support. The change in weight from baseline did not differ significantly between the two intervention groups. In two behavioral interventions, one delivered with in-person support and the other delivered remotely, without face-to-face contact between participants and weight-loss coaches, obese patients achieved and sustained clinically significant weight loss over a period of 24 months. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00783315.)

25 April 2013 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GDGail L. Daumit
Gail L. Daumit
FDFaith B. Dickerson
Faith B. Dickerson
NWNae-Yuh Wang
Nae-Yuh Wang
ADArlene Dalcin
Arlene Dalcin
GJGerald Jerome
Gerald Jerome
LALawrence J. Appel
Lawrence J. Appel
Overweight and obesity are epidemic among persons with serious mental illness, yet weight-loss trials systematically exclude this vulnerable population. Lifestyle interventions require adaptation in this group because psychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment are highly prevalent. Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of an 18-month tailored behavioral weight-loss intervention in adults with serious mental illness. We recruited overweight or obese adults from 10 community psychiatric rehabilitation outpatient programs and randomly assigned them to an intervention or a control group. Participants in the intervention group received tailored group and individual weight-management sessions and group exercise sessions. Weight change was assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months. Of 291 participants who underwent randomization, 58.1% had schizophrenia or a schizoaffective disorder, 22.0% had bipolar disorder, and 12.0% had major depression. At baseline, the mean body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 36.3, and the mean weight was 102.7 kg (225.9 lb). Data on weight at 18 months were obtained from 279 participants. Weight loss in the intervention group increased progressively over the 18-month study period and differed significantly from the control group at each follow-up visit. At 18 months, the mean between-group difference in weight (change in intervention group minus change in control group) was −3.2 kg (−7.0 lb, P=0.002); 37.8% of the participants in the intervention group lost 5% or more of their initial weight, as compared with 22.7% of those in the control group (P=0.009). There were no significant between-group differences in adverse events. A behavioral weight-loss intervention significantly reduced weight over a period of 18 months in overweight and obese adults with serious mental illness. Given the epidemic of obesity and weight-related disease among persons with serious mental illness, our findings support implementation of targeted behavioral weight-loss interventions in this high-risk population. (Funded by the National Institute of Mental Health; ACHIEVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00902694.)

1 August 2003 in Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEdward McAuley
Edward McAuley
GJGerald Jerome
Gerald Jerome
SESteriani Elavsky
Steriani Elavsky
DMDavid X Marquez
David X Marquez
SRSuzanne N Ramsey
Suzanne N Ramsey

1 June 2003 in International Journal of Psychophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CHCharles Hillman
Charles Hillman
ESErin M. Snook
Erin M. Snook
GJGerald Jerome
Gerald Jerome

1 November 2000 in Preventive Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EMEdward McAuley
Edward McAuley
BBBryan Blissmer
Bryan Blissmer
DMDavid X. Marquez
David X. Marquez
GJGerald Jerome
Gerald Jerome
AKArt Kramer
Art Kramer
JKJeffrey Katula
Jeffrey Katula