Julien Siebert

Dr. Julien Siebert

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 April 2022 in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SMSilverio Martínez-Fernández
Silverio Martínez-Fernández
JBJustus Bogner
Justus Bogner
XFXavier Franch
Xavier Franch
MOMarc Oriol
Marc Oriol
JSJulien Siebert
Julien Siebert
Stefan WagnerStefan Wagner
Stefan Wagner
AI-based systems are software systems with functionalities enabled by at least one AI component (e.g., for image-, speech-recognition, and autonomous driving). AI-based systems are becoming pervasive in society due to advances in AI. However, there is limited synthesized knowledge on Software Engineering (SE) approaches for building, operating, and maintaining AI-based systems. To collect and analyze state-of-the-art knowledge about SE for AI-based systems, we conducted a systematic mapping study. We considered 248 studies published between January 2010 and March 2020. SE for AI-based systems is an emerging research area, where more than 2/3 of the studies have been published since 2018. The most studied properties of AI-based systems are dependability and safety. We identified multiple SE approaches for AI-based systems, which we classified according to the SWEBOK areas. Studies related to software testing and software quality are very prevalent, while areas like software maintenance seem neglected. Data-related issues are the most recurrent challenges. Our results are valuable for: researchers, to quickly understand the state-of-the-art and learn which topics need more research; practitioners, to learn about the approaches and challenges that SE entails for AI-based systems; and, educators, to bridge the gap among SE and AI in their curricula.

25 June 2021 in Software Quality Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJulien Siebert
Julien Siebert
LJLisa Joeckel
Lisa Joeckel
JHJens Heidrich
Jens Heidrich
ATAdam Trendowicz
Adam Trendowicz
KNKoji Nakamichi
Koji Nakamichi
MAMikio Aoyama
Mikio Aoyama
Nowadays, systems containing components based on machine learning (ML) methods are becoming more widespread. In order to ensure the intended behavior of a software system, there are standards that define necessary qualities of the system and its components (such as ISO/IEC 25010). Due to the different nature of ML, we have to re-interpret existing qualities for ML systems or add new ones (such as trustworthiness). We have to be very precise about which quality property is relevant for which entity of interest (such as completeness of training data or correctness of trained model), and how to objectively evaluate adherence to quality requirements. In this article, we present how to systematically construct quality models for ML systems based on an industrial use case. This quality model enables practitioners to specify and assess qualities for ML systems objectively. In addition to the overall construction process described, the main outcomes include a meta-model for specifying quality models for ML systems, reference elements regarding relevant views, entities, quality properties, and measures for ML systems based on existing research, an example instantiation of a quality model for a concrete industrial use case, and lessons learned from applying the construction process. We found that it is crucial to follow a systematic process in order to come up with measurable quality properties that can be evaluated in practice. In the future, we want to learn how the term quality differs between different types of ML systems and come up with reference quality models for evaluating qualities of ML systems.

22 March 2023 in Information and Software Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJulien Siebert
Julien Siebert

31 August 2020
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
JSJulien Siebert
Julien Siebert
LJLisa Joeckel
Lisa Joeckel
JHJens Heidrich
Jens Heidrich
KNKoji Nakamichi
Koji Nakamichi
KOKyoko Ohashi
Kyoko Ohashi
MAMikio Aoyama
Mikio Aoyama

28 June 2021 in Engineering Proceedings
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
JSJulien Siebert
Julien Siebert
JGJanek Groß
Janek Groß
CSChristof Schroth
Christof Schroth
This paper presents a systematic review of Python packages with a focus on time series analysis. The objective is to provide (1) an overview of the different time series analysis tasks and preprocessing methods implemented, and (2) an overview of the development characteristics of the packages (e.g., documentation, dependencies, and community size). This review is based on a search of literature databases as well as GitHub repositories. Following the filtering process, 40 packages were analyzed. We classified the packages according to the analysis tasks implemented, the methods related to data preparation, and the means for evaluating the results produced (methods and access to evaluation data). We also reviewed documentation aspects, the licenses, the size of the packages’ community, and the dependencies used. Among other things, our results show that forecasting is by far the most frequently implemented task, that half of the packages provide access to real datasets or allow generating synthetic data, and that many packages depend on a few libraries (the most used ones being numpy, scipy and pandas). We hope that this review can help practitioners and researchers navigate the space of Python packages dedicated to time series analysis. We also provide an updated list of the reviewed packages online.

5 December 2015 in IFAC-PapersOnLine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAnna Zakharova
Anna Zakharova
SLSarah A.M. Loos
Sarah A.M. Loos
JSJulien Siebert
Julien Siebert
AGAlexandar Gjurchinovski
Alexandar Gjurchinovski
ESEckehard Schöll
Eckehard Schöll
We investigate amplitude chimera states in nonlinear dynamical networks, which consist of coexisting domains of synchronized and desynchronized dynamics. In particular, we analyze the role of time delay and stochasticity for these synchronization-desynchronization patterns. We address the question of robustness and control of amplitude chimera states in the presence of time delay and noise.