Mei Chih Huang

Prof. Mei Chih Huang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 November 2018 in Psycho-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YAYulanticha Diaz Ahwalia Aziza
Yulanticha Diaz Ahwalia Aziza
SWShan‐Tair Wang
Shan‐Tair Wang
MHMei Chih Huang
Mei Chih Huang

1 December 2015 in Nurse Education Today
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChia-Jung Lin
Chia-Jung Lin
PCPei-Rong Chang
Pei-Rong Chang
LWLing-Hua Wang
Ling-Hua Wang
MHMei Chih Huang
Mei Chih Huang

1 May 2022 in Journal of Pediatric Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLShih-Chun Lin
Shih-Chun Lin
KCKai-Ling Chang
Kai-Ling Chang
MHMei Chih Huang
Mei Chih Huang

11 October 2023 in Nursing Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TLThi Dung Le
Thi Dung Le
SLShih-Chun Lin
Shih-Chun Lin
MHMei Chih Huang
Mei Chih Huang
SFsheng-Yu Fan
sheng-Yu Fan
CKChi-Yin Kao
Chi-Yin Kao
Background: Relational autonomy is an alternative concept of autonomy in which an individual is recognized as embedded into society and influenced by relational factors. Social context, including social location, political structure, and social forces, significantly influence an agent to develop and exercise autonomy skills. The relational approach has been applied in clinical practice to identify relational factors impacting patient autonomy and decision-making, yet there is a knowledge gap in how these factors influence the demonstration of relational autonomy in the context of medical decisions of adults. Objective: The present study targeted the existing knowledge of what and how relational factors impact individuals making medical decisions using the theoretical framework of relational autonomy. Methods: A meta-synthesis study was utilized. Four electronic databases, including Embase, OVID Medline, CINAHL, and PubMed, were searched, along with gray literature and reference lists, to identify relevant studies. Results: 23 studies reporting 21 qualitative and two mixed-method studies were reviewed. Four themes emerged from the qualitative findings: (1) supportive relationships facilitate an individual’s relational autonomy; (2) obtaining comprehensive information from broader sources helps individuals exercise relational autonomy; (3) undue family pressure impedes the exercising of patient relational autonomy; and (4) healthcare providers’ dominant voice hampers the demonstration of relational autonomy. Conclusions: Applying relational autonomy to assist adults in making well-considered decisions is essential. The meta-synthesis suggests establishing a supportive relationship between individuals, healthcare providers, and family. A supportive relationship will allow healthcare providers to make judgments in line with an individual’s values and wishes with the aim of promoting relational autonomy. Advance care planning was proposed as the effective solution to obtain a consensus between individuals and their families while respecting an individual’s values and preferences. Furthermore, it is considered crucial for healthcare providers to appreciate an individual's values and incorporate their preferences into recommendations.

8 September 2010 in Journal of Clinical Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SHShiow‐Y Hwang
Shiow‐Y Hwang
MYMiaofen Yen
Miaofen Yen
BLBih-O Lee
Bih-O Lee
MHMei Chih Huang
Mei Chih Huang
HTHung‐F Tseng
Hung‐F Tseng

12 January 2022 in Pain Management Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TTThu Hang Tran Thi
Thu Hang Tran Thi
SMSriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage
Sriyani Padmalatha Konara Mudiyanselage
MHMei Chih Huang
Mei Chih Huang