Elisa Francone

Dr. Elisa Francone

Department of Health Sciences of Univesità del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2018 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABAneel Bhangu
Aneel Bhangu
AAAdesoji O Ademuyiwa
Adesoji O Ademuyiwa
MAMaria Lorena Aguilera
Maria Lorena Aguilera
PAPhilip Alexander
Philip Alexander
SASara W Al-Saqqa
Sara W Al-Saqqa
RBRuth Blanco
Ruth Blanco
Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common infections associated with health care, but its importance as a global health priority is not fully understood. We quantified the burden of SSI after gastrointestinal surgery in countries in all parts of the world. This international, prospective, multicentre cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency gastrointestinal resection within 2-week time periods at any health-care facility in any country. Countries with participating centres were stratified into high-income, middle-income, and low-income groups according to the UN's Human Development Index (HDI). Data variables from the GlobalSurg 1 study and other studies that have been found to affect the likelihood of SSI were entered into risk adjustment models. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day SSI incidence (defined by US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for superficial and deep incisional SSI). Relationships with explanatory variables were examined using Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02662231. Between Jan 4, 2016, and July 31, 2016, 13 265 records were submitted for analysis. 12 539 patients from 343 hospitals in 66 countries were included. 7339 (58·5%) patient were from high-HDI countries (193 hospitals in 30 countries), 3918 (31·2%) patients were from middle-HDI countries (82 hospitals in 18 countries), and 1282 (10·2%) patients were from low-HDI countries (68 hospitals in 18 countries). In total, 1538 (12·3%) patients had SSI within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of SSI varied between countries with high (691 [9·4%] of 7339 patients), middle (549 [14·0%] of 3918 patients), and low (298 [23·2%] of 1282) HDI (p<0·001). The highest SSI incidence in each HDI group was after dirty surgery (102 [17·8%] of 574 patients in high-HDI countries; 74 [31·4%] of 236 patients in middle-HDI countries; 72 [39·8%] of 181 patients in low-HDI countries). Following risk factor adjustment, patients in low-HDI countries were at greatest risk of SSI (adjusted odds ratio 1·60, 95% credible interval 1·05-2·37; p=0·030). 132 (21·6%) of 610 patients with an SSI and a microbiology culture result had an infection that was resistant to the prophylactic antibiotic used. Resistant infections were detected in 49 (16·6%) of 295 patients in high-HDI countries, in 37 (19·8%) of 187 patients in middle-HDI countries, and in 46 (35·9%) of 128 patients in low-HDI countries (p<0·001). Countries with a low HDI carry a disproportionately greater burden of SSI than countries with a middle or high HDI and might have higher rates of antibiotic resistance. In view of WHO recommendations on SSI prevention that highlight the absence of high-quality interventional research, urgent, pragmatic, randomised trials based in LMICs are needed to assess measures aiming to reduce this preventable complication. DFID-MRC-Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trial Development Grant, National Institute of Health Research Global Health Research Unit Grant.

1 August 2015 in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FCFederica Cipriani
Federica Cipriani
Vishal Girishchandra ShelatVishal Girishchandra Shelat
Vishal Girishchandra Shelat
MRMajd Rawashdeh
Majd Rawashdeh
EFElisa Francone
Elisa Francone
LALuca Aldrighetti
Luca Aldrighetti
Mohammed Abu HilalMohammed Abu Hilal
Mohammed Abu Hilal
Surgical management of liver lesions has moved toward "parenchymal-sparing" strategies. Although open parenchymal-sparing liver resections are supported by encouraging results, the applicability of the laparoscopic approach for nonperipheral tumors is still questionable. Our aim was to assess the feasibility, safety, and oncologic adequacy of laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resection for nonperipheral lesions with a description of the technique adopted in this setting. A prospectively collected single-center database of 517 laparoscopic liver resections was reviewed. Laparoscopic nonperipheral parenchymal-sparing liver resections (LapPSLRs), that is, entirely intraparenchymal limited resections performed on nonperipheral lesions, were selected. Intra- and perioperative outcomes were analyzed along with 3-year actuarial survival for patients with colorectal liver metastases. The group comprised 49 LapPSLRs. Colorectal liver metastases were the most frequent diagnosis (n = 24 patients). Lesions were located in segments 8, 7, 4a, and 3 in 51%, 8.2%, 36.7%, and 4.1% of cases, respectively. Conversion occurred in 4 patients (8%). Intra- and postoperative short-term outcomes were calculated for the 24 isolated LapPSLR (not associated with any concurrent liver resection). Median operative time and blood loss were 215 minutes and 225 mL, respectively. Pringle maneuver was used in 75% of cases. Postoperative 90-day mortality was nil and morbidity rate was 12.5%. Median postoperative stay was 3 days. Median tumor-free margin was 4 mm and 100% R0 rate was achieved for all LapPSLRs with curative intent. Three-year overall, recurrence-free, and disease-free survival rates were 100%, 65.2%, and 69.6%, respectively. Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing liver resections for nonperipheral liver lesions are feasible and can be performed safely without compromising perioperative and oncological outcomes.

16 May 2018 in Surgical Endoscopy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGiovanni Battista Levi Sandri
Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri
GSGabriele Spoletini
Gabriele Spoletini
GVGiovanni Vennarecci
Giovanni Vennarecci
EFElisa Francone
Elisa Francone
Mohammed Abu HilalMohammed Abu Hilal
Mohammed Abu Hilal
GEGiuseppe Maria Ettorre
Giuseppe Maria Ettorre

26 April 2013 in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EFElisa Francone
Elisa Francone
MNMarco J. Nathan
Marco J. Nathan
FMFederica Murelli
Federica Murelli
MBMaria Santina Bruno
Maria Santina Bruno
ETEnrico Traverso
Enrico Traverso
DFDaniele Friedman
Daniele Friedman

14 February 2015 in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBStefano Berti
Stefano Berti
EFElisa Francone
Elisa Francone
MMMichele Minuto
Michele Minuto
PBPierfrancesco Bonfante
Pierfrancesco Bonfante
CSCarlo Sagnelli
Carlo Sagnelli
EFEmilio Falco
Emilio Falco

7 July 2022 in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ERElisa Reitano
Elisa Reitano
EFElisa Francone
Elisa Francone
EBElisa Bona
Elisa Bona
AFAntonia Follenzi
Antonia Follenzi
SGSergio Gentilli
Sergio Gentilli
Introduction Growing evidence supports the role of the intestinal microbiome in the development of different intestinal and extraintestinal diseases. Diverticular disease (DD) is one of the most common disorders in western countries. In the last years, different articles have suggested a possible role of the intestinal microbiome in DD pathogenesis and in the development of acute diverticulitis (AD). This systematic review aimed to clarify the current knowledge on the role of the intestinal microbiome in colonic diverticulitis in different stages according to the 2009 PRISMA guidelines. Materials and Methods Two independent reviewers searched the literature in a systematic manner through online databases, including Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Register, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database, and Google Scholar. Patients with any stage of disease were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale for case-control and cohort studies was used for the quality assessment of the selected articles. Results Overall, nine studies were included in the review. Only one article was focused on patients with AD, while all other articles only considered patients with DD without acute inflammation signs. Enterobacteriaceae seems to be the microbiota most associated with the disease, followed by Bifidobacteria. Conclusions All the included studies showed great heterogeneity in population characteristics and sampling methods. Therefore, given the high prevalence of colonic diverticulitis in the general population, further studies are needed to clarify the role of the intestinal microbiome, paving the way to new target therapies with important social implications.