Fangming Jiang

Prof. Dr. Fangming Jiang

Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 September 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Fangming JiangFangming Jiang
Fangming Jiang
PPPeng Peng
Peng Peng
Underutilization due to performance limitations imposed by species and charge transports is one of the key issues that persist with various lithium-ion batteries. To elucidate the relevant mechanisms, two groups of characteristic parameters were proposed. The first group contains three characteristic time parameters, namely: (1) te, which characterizes the Li-ion transport rate in the electrolyte phase, (2) ts, characterizing the lithium diffusion rate in the solid active materials, and (3) tc, describing the local Li-ion depletion rate in electrolyte phase at the electrolyte/electrode interface due to electrochemical reactions. The second group contains two electric resistance parameters: Re and Rs, which represent respectively, the equivalent ionic transport resistance and the effective electronic transport resistance in the electrode. Electrochemical modeling and simulations to the discharge process of LiCoO2 cells reveal that: (1) if te, ts and tc are on the same order of magnitude, the species transports may not cause any performance limitations to the battery; (2) the underlying mechanisms of performance limitations due to thick electrode, high-rate operation, and large-sized active material particles as well as effects of charge transports are revealed. The findings may be used as quantitative guidelines in the development and design of more advanced Li-ion batteries.

18 April 2014 in Heat and Mass Transfer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PPPeng Peng
Peng Peng
YSYiqiong Sun
Yiqiong Sun
Fangming JiangFangming Jiang
Fangming Jiang

6 December 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMOHMED DAFALLA AHMED MOHMED
MOHMED DAFALLA AHMED MOHMED
LWLin Wei
Lin Wei
BHBereket Tsegai Habte
Bereket Tsegai Habte
JGJian Guo
Jian Guo
Fangming JiangFangming Jiang
Fangming Jiang
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have been recognized as a promising power generation source for a wide range of automotive, stationary, and portable electronic applications. However, the durability of PEMFCs remains as one of the key barriers to their wide commercialization. The membrane electrode assembly (MEA) as a central part of a PEMFC, which consists of a proton exchange membrane with a catalyst layer (CL) and gas diffusion layer (GDL) on each side, is subject to failure and degradation in long-running and cycling load conditions. The real-time monitoring of the degradation evolution process through experimental techniques is challenging. Therefore, different numerical modeling approaches were proposed in the literature to assist the understanding of the degradation mechanisms in PEMFCs. To provide modeling progress in the addressed field, this paper briefly discusses the different degradation mechanisms occurring in the MEA. In particular, we present a detailed review of MEA degradation modeling research work, with special attention paid to the physical-based models (mechanistic models). Following the most recent relevant literature, the results showed that the combination of microstructure component models with macro-scale comprehensive PEMFC models provides a better understanding of degradation mechanisms when compared to single-scale degradation models. In this sense, it is concluded that in order to develop an accurate and efficient predictive degradation model, the different relevant scales ranging from nano- to macro-sized scales should be considered, and coupling techniques for multiscale modeling have to be advanced. Finally, the paper summarizes the degradation models for different MEA components. It is highlighted that the GDL chemical degradation models that describe damage accumulation are relatively limited. The paper provides a useful reference for the recent developments in the MEA degradation modeling of PEMFCs.

12 February 2019 in International Journal of Energy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TDTi Dong
Ti Dong
YWYiwei Wang
Yiwei Wang
PPPeng Peng
Peng Peng
Fangming JiangFangming Jiang
Fangming Jiang

1 April 2016 in Science Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHShaoyang He
Shaoyang He
JZJianbang Zeng
Jianbang Zeng
BHBereket Tsegai Habte
Bereket Tsegai Habte
Fangming JiangFangming Jiang
Fangming Jiang

27 June 2020 in International Journal of Energy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AIAmier Ibrahim
Amier Ibrahim
JGJian Guo
Jian Guo
YWYiwei Wang
Yiwei Wang
YZYaodong Zheng
Yaodong Zheng
BLBo Lei
Bo Lei
Fangming JiangFangming Jiang
Fangming Jiang