Fitalew Tadele Admasu

Dr. Fitalew Tadele Admasu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2024 in Biologics: Targets and Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMisganaw Asmamaw Mengstie
Misganaw Asmamaw Mengstie
MAMuluken Teshome Azezew
Muluken Teshome Azezew
TDTadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
ATAssefa Agegnehu Teshome
Assefa Agegnehu Teshome
FAFitalew Tadele Admasu
Fitalew Tadele Admasu
EAEndeshaw Chekol Abeb
Endeshaw Chekol Abeb
The CRISPR-Cas (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)) and the associated protein (Cas9) system, a young but well-studied genome-editing tool, holds plausible solutions to a wide range of genetic disorders. The single-guide RNA (sgRNA) with a 20-base user-defined spacer sequence and the Cas9 endonuclease form the core of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. This sgRNA can direct the Cas9 nuclease to any genomic region that includes a protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) just downstream and matches the spacer sequence. The current challenge in the clinical applications of CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing technology is the potential off-target effects that can cause DNA cleavage at the incorrect sites. Off-target genome editing confuses and diminishes the therapeutic potential of CRISPR-Cas9 in addition to potentially casting doubt on scientific findings regarding the activities of genes. In this review, we summarize the recent technological advancements in reducing the off-target effect of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.

19 December 2022 in Frontiers in Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TDTadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
MGMarkeshaw Tiruneh G/Medhin
Markeshaw Tiruneh G/Medhin
FAFitalew Tadele Admasu
Fitalew Tadele Admasu
GAGetachew Asmare
Getachew Asmare
EEEngidaw Fentahun Enyew
Engidaw Fentahun Enyew
EAEndeshaw Chekol Abeb
Endeshaw Chekol Abeb
Cardiometabolic disease is a spectrum of diseases including, cardiovascular diseases, and metabolic syndrome. It is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with premature deaths being preventable. Currently, sleep has emerged as a potential target for cardiometabolic disease prevention. Several epidemiological studies have provided ample evidence that objectively measured short sleep duration increases the risk of cardiometabolic disease. However, the findings are inconsistent, and few studies measure sleep duration on cardiometabolic profiles objectively. Therefore, in this review, we focused on the recently published literature that explored the association between objectively measured sleep duration and cardiometabolic profiles (cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome), seeking more insights regarding the applicability and, in turn, the impact of objectively measured sleep duration on cardiometabolic health, which is relatively understudied. We retrieved the information manually from PubMed, Google Scholar, HINARI, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2022 using appropriate search terms, we included 49 articles. In this review, we found a strong relationship between objectively measured sleep duration and the risk of cardiometabolic disease, indicating that objectively measured short sleep durations increase cardiometabolic risks. In general, the association between objectively measured sleep duration and increased cardiometabolic risks (CMR) has been well-documented in higher-income countries. Several studies found that longer sleep duration was associated with a more favorable cardiometabolic profile in early adolescence, independent of other risk factors. On the other hand, objectively measured short sleep duration is associated with adverse cardiometabolic health outcomes such as coronary heart disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome.

1 November 2021 in Infection and Drug Resistance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFitalew Tadele Admasu
Fitalew Tadele Admasu
Background: Cancer patients are classified as being at high risk of contracting COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death and were recommended to have early access to the limited COVID-19 vaccine. However, there are limited studies on the knowledge and acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine among cancer patients. Therefore, this study aimed at assessing the awareness, readiness, and associated factors among cancer patients. Methods: Institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 422 cancer patients from May to August, 2021. A structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect primary data. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression followed by multivariable analysis were performed to investigate the independent association of factors with the outcome variable. Finally, statistical significance was declared at P < 0.05 using AOR and 95% CI. Results: From the 422 cancer patients who participated, 77 (18.2%) had a history of COVID-19 infection, and 224 (55%) believe that the cancer disease will not make them more vulnerable to be infected by COVID-19. Accordingly, younger age (18– 30 years) (AOR = 2.73: 95% CI: 0.18, 4.51), female (AOR = 6.4: 95% CI: 0.7, 13.8), having information about COVID-19 vaccine (AOR = 6.9: 95% CI: 3.1, 15.2), COVID-19 infection history (AOR = 6.0: 95% CI: 2.5, 11.8), duration since cancer diagnosis (≥ 10 years) (AOR= 6.2: 95% CI: 2.6, 14.7), and belief about the likelihood of dying of COVID-19 infection (AOR = 3.05: 95% CI: 1.03, 4.05) were the independent predictors of the likelihood of receiving COVID-19 vaccine among cancer patients. Conclusion: This study has found significant cancer patients with poor knowledge about the vaccine, and the percentage of both the first and second round of COVID-19 vaccination was small. Therefore, information communication with cancer patients and oncologists about the COVID-19 vaccine may help to decrease vaccine hesitancy.

1 April 2022 in Infection and Drug Resistance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEndeshaw Chekol Abeb
Endeshaw Chekol Abeb
MGMarkeshaw Tiruneh G/Medhin
Markeshaw Tiruneh G/Medhin
ATAwgichew Behaile T/Mariam
Awgichew Behaile T/Mariam
TDTadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
TATeklie Mengie Ayele
Teklie Mengie Ayele
GAGetachew Asmare
Getachew Asmare
Since the emergence of COVID 19, the authentic SARS-CoV-2 has evolved into a range of novel variants that are of more global concern. In late November 2021, the Omicron (lineage B.1.1.529) variant was identified as a new variant and considered as the fifth variant of concern. Omicron harbors a genetic profile that is exceedingly unusual, with a huge number of mutations. Above thirty mutations are localized in the S protein, while some are found in other structural and non-structural proteins. Half of the mutations in the S protein are in the RBD, which is a major target of antibodies, showing that Omicron mutations may affect antibody binding affinity to the S protein. The Omicron variant has been found to result in immune escape, therapeutic or vaccine escape, as well as increased transmissibility and reinfection risk, explaining its rapid international spread that sparks a global alarm even more serious than the previously reported variants. Omicron has the capability to bypass at least some of the multi-faceted immune responses induced by prior infection or vaccination. It is shown to extensively escape neutralizing antibodies while evading cell mediated immune defense to a lesser extent. The efficacy of COVID 19 vaccines against Omicron variant is decreased with primary vaccination, showing that the vaccine is less efficient in preventing Omicron infections. However, after receiving a booster vaccine dose, the immunological response to Omicron significantly improved and hold promising results. Despite the mild nature of the disease in most vaccinated people, the rapid spread of Omicron, as well as the increased risk of re-infection, poses yet another major public health concern. Therefore, effort should be devoted to maintaining the existing COVID 19 preventive measures as well as developing new vaccination strategies in order to control the fast dissemination of Omicron.

22 September 2021 in Food Science & Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFitalew Tadele Admasu
Fitalew Tadele Admasu
AMAddisu Melak
Addisu Melak
BDBiruk Demissie
Biruk Demissie
CYChalachew Yenew
Chalachew Yenew
MHMezgebu Legesse Habtie
Mezgebu Legesse Habtie
TDTadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
Aflatoxin M1 is the most significant toxin of milk and milk products. It is immunosuppressive, mutagenic, and carcinogenic compounds to humans. Therefore, this study was aimed to evaluate the concentration of aflatoxin M1 and its determinants in raw cow milk sample intended for human consumption in South Gondar Zone, Ethiopia. A cross‐sectional study was conducted on a total of 100 dairy farmers from January to February 2020. Around 50 ml, 100 raw milk samples were collected for aflatoxin M1 analysis. A simple random sampling technique was applied to get the households. Binary and multivariate logistic regressions were used to see the association between predictor and outcome variables. From the 100 dairy farmers who had participated, 38% had heard about aflatoxin in the milk sample. Aflatoxin M1 was detected in the 99(99%) raw milk samples, of these 41 (41%) exceeded the limit of the European Union. The logistic regression analysis result showed that residence, awareness about the level of aflatoxin in the milk sample, management mold‐contaminated animal feed, animal feed storage facility, and grazing systems were significantly associated with the high level of aflatoxin in the milk sample. Almost all milk samples analyzed were positive for aflatoxin M1, and 41% of samples were above the limit set by European Union. Many easily manageable and preventable factors were associated with higher levels of aflatoxin M1 in the milk sample than the European Union limit, which suggests continuous monitoring of milk and milk products is necessary.

22 August 2022 in Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MHMezgebu Legesse Habte
Mezgebu Legesse Habte
EBEtsegenet Assefa Beyene
Etsegenet Assefa Beyene
TFTeka Obsa Feyisa
Teka Obsa Feyisa
FAFitalew Tadele Admasu
Fitalew Tadele Admasu
ATAnmut Tilahun
Anmut Tilahun
GDGetahun Chala Diribsa
Getahun Chala Diribsa
Introduction: Teff (Eragrostis tef) is an indigenous crop in Ethiopia and exists in white, red, and mixed varieties. Several types of research confirmed that teff is rich in many essential amino acids, slowly digesting carbohydrates, essential fatty acids, minerals, vitamins, fibers, and other components. Since teff has a low glycemic index, is enriched in essential amino acids and fatty acids, and contains nutritionally balanced minerals, vitamins, and their precursors, it could be a promising food for the prevention and management of diabetes. People with diabetes mellitus are recommended to feed on a diet having a low glycemic index and enriched in essential nutrients. Objective: This review aimed to summarize the nutritional composition of teff (Eragrostis tef) and its value in diabetic patients. Methodology: We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies on the nutritional composition of teff and its value for diabetic patients published in English since 2010. Conclusion: According to available data, teff is a nutritionally valuable food type for diabetic patients.