Ilaria Caravella

Ilaria Caravella


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 August 2022 in Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NTNardi Tetaj
Nardi Tetaj
ACAlessandro Capone
Alessandro Capone
GSGiulia Valeria Stazi
Giulia Valeria Stazi
MMMaria Cristina Marini
Maria Cristina Marini
GGGabriele Garotto
Gabriele Garotto
SZSara Zito
Sara Zito
Background: COVID‑19 is a novel cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that leads patients to intensive care unit (ICU) admission requiring invasive ventilation, who consequently are at risk of developing of ventilator‑associated pneumonia (VAP). The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, antimicrobial resistance, risk factors, and outcome of VAP in ICU COVID-19 patients in invasive mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: Observational prospective study including adult ICU admissions between January 1, 2021, and June 31, 2021, with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis were recorded daily, including demographics, medical history, ICU clinical data, etiology of VAPs, and the outcome. The diagnosis of VAP was based on multi-criteria decision analysis which included a combination of radiological, clinical, and microbiological criteria in ICU patients in MV for at least 48 h. Results: Two hundred eighty-four COVID-19 patients in MV were admitted in ICU. Ninety-four patients (33%) had VAP during the ICU stay, of which 85 had a single episode of VAP and 9 multiple episodes. The median time of onset of VAP from intubation were 8 days (IQR, 5–13). The overall incidence of VAP was of 13.48 episodes per 1000 days in MV. The main etiological agent was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (39.8% of all VAPs) followed by Klebsiella spp. (16.5%); of them, 41.4% and 17.6% were carbapenem resistant, respectively. Patients during the mechanical ventilation in orotracheal intubation (OTI) had a higher incidence than those in tracheostomy, 16.46 and 9.8 episodes per 1000-MV day, respectively. An increased risk of VAP was reported in patients receiving blood transfusion (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.26–3.59, p = 0.005) or therapy with Tocilizumab/Sarilumab (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.12–3.84, p = 0.02). The pronation and PaO2/FiO2 ratio at ICU admission were not significantly associated with the development of VAPs. Furthermore, VAP episodes did not increase the risk of death in ICU COVID-19 patients. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients have a higher incidence of VAP compared to the general ICU population, but it is similar to that of ICU ARDS patients in the pre-COVID-19 period. Interleukin-6 inhibitors and blood transfusions may increase the risk of VAP. The widespread use of empirical antibiotics in these patients should be avoided to reduce the selecting pressure on the growth of multidrug-resistant bacteria by implementing infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship programs even before ICU admission.

29 November 2021 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NTNardi Tetaj
Nardi Tetaj
GGGabriele Garotto
Gabriele Garotto
FAFabrizio Albarello
Fabrizio Albarello
AMAnnelisa Mastrobattista
Annelisa Mastrobattista
MMMicaela Maritti
Micaela Maritti
IGICU COVID-19 Study Group
ICU COVID-19 Study Group
(1) Background: COVID-19 is a novel cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Indeed, with the increase of ARDS cases due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has also been an increase in the incidence of cases with pneumothorax (PNX) and pneumomediastinum (PNM). However, the incidence and the predictors of PNX/PMN in these patients are currently unclear and even conflicting. (2) Methods: The present observational study analyzed the incidence of barotrauma (PNX/PNM) in COVID-19 patients with moderate–severe ARDS hospitalized in a year of the pandemic, also focusing on the three waves occurring during the year, and treated with positive-pressure ventilation (PPV). We collected demographic and clinical data. (3) Results: During this period, 40 patients developed PNX/PNM. The overall incidence of barotrauma in all COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a year was 1.6%, and in those with moderate–severe ARDS in PPV was 7.2% and 3.8 events per 1000 positive-pressure ventilator days. The incidence of barotrauma in moderate–severe ARDS COVID-19 patients during the three waves was 7.8%, 7.4%, and 8.7%, respectively. Treatment with noninvasive respiratory support alone was associated with an incidence of barotrauma of 9.1% and 2.6 events per 1000 noninvasive ventilator days, of which 95% were admitted to the ICU after the event, due to a worsening of respiratory parameters. The incidence of barotrauma of ICU COVID-19 patients in invasive ventilation over a year was 5.8% and 2.7 events per 1000 invasive ventilator days. There was no significant difference in demographics and clinical features between the barotrauma and non-barotrauma group. The mortality was higher in the barotrauma group (17 patients died, 47.2%) than in the non-barotrauma group (170 patients died, 37%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.429). (4) Conclusions: The incidence of PNX/PNM in moderate–severe ARDS COVID-19 patients did not differ significantly between the three waves over a year, and does not appear to be very different from that in ARDS patients in the pre-COVID era. The barotrauma does not appear to significantly increase mortality in COVID-19 patients with moderate–severe ARDS if protective ventilation strategies are applied. Attention should be paid to the risk of barotrauma in COVID-19 patients in noninvasive ventilation because the event increases the probability of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and intubation.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NTNardi Tetaj
Nardi Tetaj
MMMicaela Maritti
Micaela Maritti
GSGiulia Stazi
Giulia Stazi
MMMaria Cristina Marini
Maria Cristina Marini
DCDaniele Centanni
Daniele Centanni
IGICU COVID-19 Study Group
ICU COVID-19 Study Group
Background: The benefits and timing of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) COVID-19 patients are still controversial. PDT is considered a high-risk procedure for the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare workers (HCWs). The present study analyzed the optimal timing of PDT, the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PDT, and the safety of HCWs performing PDT. Methods: Of the 133 COVID-19 patients who underwent PDT in our ICU from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021, 13 patients were excluded, and 120 patients were enrolled. A trained medical team was dedicated to the PDT procedure. Demographic, clinical history, and outcome data were collected. Patients who underwent PDT were stratified into two groups: an early group (PDT ≤ 12 days after orotracheal intubation (OTI) and a late group (>12 days after OTI). An HCW surveillance program was also performed. Results: The early group included 61 patients and the late group included 59 patients. The early group patients had a shorter ICU length of stay and fewer days of mechanical ventilation than the late group (p < 0.001). On day 7 after tracheostomy, early group patients required fewer intravenous anesthetic drugs and experienced an improvement of the ventilation parameters PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PEEP, and FiO2 (p < 0.001). No difference in the case fatality ratio between the two groups was observed. No SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported in the HCWs performing the PDTs. Conclusions: PDT was safe and effective for COVID-19 patients since it improved respiratory support parameters, reduced ICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, and optimized the weaning process. The procedure was safe for all HCWs involved in the dedicated medical team. The development of standardized early PDT protocols should be implemented, and PDT could be considered a first-line approach in ICU COVID-19 patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NTNardi Tetaj
Nardi Tetaj
GSGiulia Valeria Stazi
Giulia Valeria Stazi
MMMaria Cristina Marini
Maria Cristina Marini
GGGabriele Garotto
Gabriele Garotto
DBDonatella Busso
Donatella Busso
OGon behalf of ICU COVID-19 Study Group
on behalf of ICU COVID-19 Study Group
(1) Background: Although COVID-19 is largely a respiratory disease, it is actually a systemic disease that has a wide range of effects that are not yet fully known. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, predictors and outcome of non-hepatic hyperammonemia (NHH) in COVID-19 in intensive care unit (ICU); (2) Methods: This is a 3-month prospective observational study in a third-level COVID-19 hospital. The authors collected demographic, clinical, severity score and outcome data. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of NHH; (3) Results: 156 COVID-19 patients were admitted to the ICU. The incidence of NHH was 12.2% (19 patients). The univariate analysis showed that invasive mechanical ventilation had a 6.6-fold higher risk (OR 6.66, 95% CI 0.86–51.6, p = 0.039) for NHH, while in the multiple regression analysis, there was a 7-fold higher risk for NHH—but it was not statistically significant (OR 7.1, 95% CI 0.90–56.4, p = 0.062). Demographics, clinical characteristics and mortality in the ICU at 28 days did not show a significant association with NHH. (4) Conclusions: The incidence of NHH in ICU COVID-19 patients was not low. NHH did not appear to significantly increase mortality, and all patients with non-hepatic hyperammonemia were successfully treated without further complications. However, the pathogenesis of NHH in ICU patients with COVID-19 remains a topic to be explored with further research.

14 February 2026 in Clinics and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMaria Grazia Bocci
Maria Grazia Bocci
GCGiulia Capecchi
Giulia Capecchi
ALAntonio Lesci
Antonio Lesci
DRDorotea Rubino
Dorotea Rubino
ICIlaria Caravella
Ilaria Caravella
DBDaniele Guerino Biasucci
Daniele Guerino Biasucci
Background: Meningoencephalitis is a complex inflammatory condition of the CNS that can result in significant morbidity and mortality in critically ill adults. Accurate and timely neuromonitoring is essential for guiding management and improving outcomes. This study aimed to descriptively evaluate the prognostic value of early TCCD monitoring, particularly the pulsatility index, and its integration with conventional and perfusion MRI in patients with meningoencephalitis. Methods: We present an observational, retrospective, cohort study involving ten adult patients (median age 56 years, IQR 45.5–68.5; mean 55.9, range 35–76) with neurological syndromes caused by suspected or confirmed infectious meningoencephalitis. Etiologies included bacterial meningitis/meningoencephalitis (50%), viral meningoencephalitis (10%), neurotoxoplasmosis (10%), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (10%), and undetermined origin (20%). Patients underwent TCCD and MRI within 24 h. In five cases, standard MRI sequences were acquired, while in the remaining five, perfusion imaging was performed using Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL). A favorable outcome was defined as survival with neurological recovery (Glasgow Outcome Scale > 5) at ICU discharge. Results: TCCD-derived PI provided valuable information on cerebral hemodynamics. PI values ≤ 1.25 were associated with favorable clinical outcomes and symmetrical MRI findings. Conversely, PI > 1.25 correlated with poor prognosis and often preceded MRI-detectable structural damage. When combined with ASL, PI mirrored the detected perfusion asymmetries and was associated with poor prognosis in fatal cases. Conclusions: Bedside TCCD can offer real-time assessment of cerebrovascular dynamics and, when integrated with conventional and ASL MRI, could enhance the understanding of pathophysiological processes in meningoencephalitis, supporting timely and informed decisions in neurocritical care.