Jing Gong

Prof. Jing Gong

Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 December 2019 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jing GongJing Gong
Jing Gong
JLJiyu Liu
Jiyu Liu
WHWen Hao
Wen Hao
SNShengdong Nie
Shengdong Nie
BZBin Zheng
Bin Zheng
WPWeijun Peng
Weijun Peng

1 February 2018 in Physica Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jing GongJing Gong
Jing Gong
JLJi-Yu Liu
Ji-Yu Liu
LWLi-Jia Wang
Li-Jia Wang
XSXi-Wen Sun
Xi-Wen Sun
BZBin Zheng
Bin Zheng
SNShengdong Nie
Shengdong Nie

30 June 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jing GongJing Gong
Jing Gong
JLJiyu Liu
Jiyu Liu
HLHaiming Li
Haiming Li
HZHui Zhu
Hui Zhu
TWTingting Wang
Tingting Wang
YGYajia Gu
Yajia Gu
This study aims to develop a deep neural network (DNN)-based two-stage risk stratification model for early lung adenocarcinomas in CT images, and investigate the performance compared with practicing radiologists. A total of 2393 GGNs were retrospectively collected from 2105 patients in four centers. All the pathologic results of GGNs were obtained from surgically resected specimens. A two-stage deep neural network was developed based on the 3D residual network and atrous convolution module to diagnose benign and malignant GGNs (Task1) and classify between invasive adenocarcinoma (IA) and non-IA for these malignant GGNs (Task2). A multi-reader multi-case observer study with six board-certified radiologists’ (average experience 11 years, range 2–28 years) participation was conducted to evaluate the model capability. DNN yielded area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.76 ± 0.03 (95% confidence interval (CI): (0.69, 0.82)) and 0.96 ± 0.02 (95% CI: (0.92, 0.98)) for Task1 and Task2, which were equivalent to or higher than radiologists in the senior group with average AUC values of 0.76 and 0.95, respectively (p > 0.05). With the CT image slice thickness increasing from 1.15 mm ± 0.36 to 1.73 mm ± 0.64, DNN performance decreased 0.08 and 0.22 for the two tasks. The results demonstrated (1) a positive trend between the diagnostic performance and radiologist’s experience, (2) the DNN yielded equivalent or even higher performance in comparison with senior radiologists, and (3) low image resolution decreased model performance in predicting the risks of GGNs. Once tested prospectively in clinical practice, the DNN could have the potential to assist doctors in precision diagnosis and treatment of early lung adenocarcinoma.

2 June 2026 in Advanced Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YXYanglan Xu
Yanglan Xu
SZShuchang Zhou
Shuchang Zhou
QPQin Peng
Qin Peng
XBXiao Bao
Xiao Bao
XYXiaodan Ye
Xiaodan Ye
Jing GongJing Gong
Jing Gong
Predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is clinically important yet remains challenging. Here, we introduce a foundation model‐derived computed tomography (CT) imaging biomarker established from a multi‐center cohort of 702 patients. Specifically, we developed and validated a non‐invasive baseline CT‐based model for risk stratification of pathological response. To address scanner and protocol heterogeneity, we first built a 3D Vision Mamba‐based CT super‐resolution model trained on 2494 cases for image standardization. We then fine‐tuned a lung cancer‐specific CT foundation model from a pretrained 3D model (VoCo) using 6643 chest CT scans. Finally, we constructed a multi‐task Swin Transformer that jointly performs risk stratification and segments tumors to generate the imaging biomarker. Across five centers, the model achieved consistently strong generalization (AUC: 0.75–0.87) for pCR prediction. Genomic analysis revealed that the biomarker was independent of tumor mutational burden but significantly associated with TP53 mutations, suggesting an association with a radiogenomic phenotype related to this alteration. Together, these results demonstrate a generalizable and biologically meaningful foundation model‐based biomarker for non‐invasive risk stratification of pathological response in NSCLC.