Non-unions continue to present a challenge to trauma surgeons, as current treatment options are limited, duration of treatment is long, and the outcome often unsatisfactory. Additionally, standard treatment with autologous bone grafts is associated with comorbidity at the donor site. Therefore, alternatives to autologous bone grafts and further therapeutic strategies to improve on the outcome and reduce cost for care providers are desirable. In this study in Sprague–Dawley rats we employed a recently established sequential defect model, which provides a platform to test new potential therapeutic strategies on non-unions while gaining mechanistic insight into their actions. The effects of a combinatorial treatment of a bone graft substitute (HACaS+G) implantation and systemic PTH administration was assessed by µ-CT, histological analysis, and bio-mechanical testing and compared to monotreatment and controls. Although neither PTH alone nor the combination of a bone graft substitute and PTH led to the formation of a stable union, our data demonstrate a clear osteoinductive and osteoconductive effect of the bone graft substitute. Additionally, PTH administration was shown to induce vascularization, both as a single adjuvant treatment and in combination with the bone graft substitute. Thus, systemic PTH administration is a potential synergistic co-treatment to bone graft substitutes.

Background: Managing bone defects in non-union surgery remains challenging, especially in cases of large defects exceeding 5 cm in size. Historically, amputation and compound osteosynthesis with a remaining PMMA spacer have been viable and commonly used options. The risk of non-union after fractures varies between 2% and 30% and is dependent on various factors. Autologous bone grafts from the iliac crest are still considered the gold standard but are limited in availability, prompting consideration of artificial grafts. Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are as follows: 1. To evaluate the radiological outcome of e.g., the consolidation and thus the stability of the bone (three out of four consolidated cortices/Lane-Sandhu-score of at least 3) by using S53P4-type bioactive glass (BaG) as a substitute material for large-sized bone defects in combination with autologous bone using the RIA technique. 2. To determine noticeable data-points as a base for future studies. Methods: In our clinic, 13 patients received bioactive glass (BaG) as a substitute in non-union therapy to promote osteoconductive aspects. BaG is a synthetic material composed of sodium, silicate, calcium, and phosphate. The primary endpoint of our study was to evaluate the radiological consolidation of bone after one and two years. To assess bone stabilization, we used a modified Lane-Sandhu score, considering only radiological criteria. A bone was considered stabilized if it achieved a minimum score of 3. For full consolidation (all four cortices consolidated), a minimum score of 4 was required. Each bone defect exceeded 5 cm in length, with an average size of 6.69 ± 1.92 cm. Results: The mean follow-up period for patients without final bone consolidation was 34.25 months, with a standard deviation of 14.57 months, a median of 32.00 months and a range of 33 months. In contrast, patients with a fully consolidated non-union had an average follow-up of 20.11 ± 15.69 months and a range of 45 months. Overall, the mean time from non-union surgery to consolidation for patients who achieved final union was 14.91 ± 6.70 months. After one year, six patients (46.2%) achieved complete bone consolidation according to the Lane-Sandhu score. Three patients (23.1%) displayed evident callus formation with expected stability, while three patients (23.1%) did not develop any callus, and one patient only formed a minimal callus with no expected stability. After two years, 9 out of 13 patients (69.2%) had a score of 4. The remaining four patients (30.8%) without expected stability either did not heal within two years or required a revision during that time. Conclusions: Bioactive glass (BaG) in combination with autologous bone (RIA) appears to be a suitable filler material for treating extensive non-unions of the femur and tibia. This approach seems to show non-inferiority to treatment with Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP). To ensure the success of this treatment, it is crucial to validate the procedure through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a control group using TCP, which would provide higher statistical power and more reliable results.

Background: The treatment of large-sized bone defects remains a major challenge in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Although there are many treatment options, there is still no clear guidance on surgical management, and the influence of defect size on radiological and clinical outcome remains unclear due to the small number of affected patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of defect size on the outcome of atrophic and infected nonunions of the tibia or the femur based on the diamond concept in order to provide recommendations for treatment guidance. Patients and Methods: All medical records, surgical reports, laboratory data and radiological images of patients treated surgically for atrophic or infected nonunions of the lower limbs (femur or tibia) between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 were examined. Patients with proximal, diaphyseal or distal nonunions of the femur or tibia who were surgically treated at our institution according to the “diamond concept” and attended our standardised follow-up program were included in a database. Surgical treatment was performed as a one- or two-step procedure, depending on the type of nonunion. Patients with a segmental bone defect ≥5 cm were matched with patients suffering a bone defect <5 cm based on five established criteria. According to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 70 patients with a bone defect ≥5 cm were suitable for analysis. Two groups were formed by matching: the study group (bone defect ≥5 cm; n = 39) and control group (bone defect <5 cm; n = 39). The study was approved by the local ethics committee (S-262/2017). Results: The mean defect size was 7.13 cm in the study and 2.09 cm in the control group. The chi-square test showed equal consolidation rates between the groups (SG: 53.8%; CG: 66.7%). However, the Kaplan–Meier curve and log-rank test showed a significant difference regarding the mean duration until consolidation was achieved, with an average of 15.95 months in the study and 9.24 months in the control group (α = 0.05, p = 0.001). Linear regression showed a significant increase in consolidation duration with increasing defect size (R² = 0.121, p = 0.021). Logistic regression modelling showed a significant negative correlation between consolidation rate and revision performance, as well as an increasing number of revisions, prior surgeries and total number of surgeries performed on the limb. Clinical outcomes showed equal full weight bearing of the lower extremity after 5.54 months in the study vs. 4.86 months in the control group (p = 0.267). Conclusion: Surprisingly, defect size does not seem to have a significant effect on the consolidation rate and should not be seen as a risk factor. However, for the treatment of large-sized nonunions, the follow-up period should be prolonged up to 24 months, due to the extended time until consolidation will be achieved. This period should also pass before a premature revision with new bone augmentation is performed. In addition, it should be kept in mind that as the number of previous surgeries and revisions increases, the prospects for consolidation decrease and a change in therapeutic approach may be required.

The treatment of non-unions is often complicated by segmental bone defects and bacterial colonization. Because of the limited availability of autologous bone grafts, tissue engineering focuses on antibiotic-loaded bone graft substitutes. HACaS+G is a resorbable calcium sulphate-hydroxyapatite loaded with gentamicin. The osteoinductive, osteoconductive, and anti-infective effect of HACaS+G has already been demonstrated in clinical studies on patients with chronic osteomyelitis. However, especially for the treatment of infected non-unions with segmental bone defects by HACaS+G, reliable clinical testing is difficult and sufficient experimental data are lacking. We used an already established sequential animal model in infected and non-infected rat femora to investigate the osteoinductive, osteoconductive, and anti-infective efficacy of HACaS+G for the treatment of infected non-unions. In biomechanical testing, bone consolidation could not be observed under infected and non-infected conditions. Only a prophylactic effect against infections, but no eradication, could be verified in the microbiological analysis. Using µ-CT scans and histology, osteoinduction was detected in both the infected and non-infected bone, whereas osteoconduction occurred only in the non-infected setting. Our data showed that HACaS+G is osteoinductive, but does not have added benefits in infected non-unions in terms of osteoconduction and mechanical bone stability, especially in those with segmental bone defects.

The treatment of infected and non-infected non-unions remains a major challenge in trauma surgery. Due to the limited availability of autologous bone grafts and the need for local anti-infective treatment, bone substitutes have been the focus of tissue engineering for years. In this context, bioactive glasses are promising, especially regarding their anti-infective potential, which could reduce the need for local and systemic treatment with conventional antibiotics. The aim of this study was to investigate the osteoinductive and osteoconductive effects, as well as the anti-infectious potential, of S53P4 using a standardized non-union model, which had not been investigated previously. Using an already established sequential animal model in infected and non-infected rat femora, we were able to investigate bioactive glass S53P4 under realistic non-union conditions regarding its osteoinductive, osteoconductive and anti-infective potential with the use of µCT scans, biomechanical testing and histological, as well as microbiological, analysis. Although S53P4 did not lead to a stable union in the non-infected or the infected setting, µCT analysis revealed an osteoinductive effect of S53P4 under non-infected conditions, which was diminished under infected conditions. The osteoconductive effect of S53P4 remained almost negligible in histological analysis, even 8 weeks after treatment. Additionally, the expected anti-infective effect could not be demonstrated. Our data suggested that S53P4 should not be used in infected non-unions, especially in those with large bone defects.