Background: Physical activity (PA) has emerged as an alternative nonpharmacological approach to effectively address the effects of dementia. The primary aim was to identify and summarize PA interventions and their effects on cognitive function among persons with dementia (PwD). Methods: A systematic review was conducted with a meta-analysis using different electronic databases, such as PubMed, Embase, APA PsycNET, and the Web of Science. The identified and selected studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were written in English, published between 2000 and 2020, and implemented among PwD who received a PA intervention and whose cognitive function was measured at baseline and during a follow-up. Results: Twenty-two PA intervention studies met the eligibility criteria and showed a medium-size effect on the cognitive function of PwD, 0.4803 (95% CI = 0.1901–0.7704), with a high percentage of heterogeneity (I² = 86%, p ≤ 0.0001). Moreover, this review complements other reviews by including eight studies that have not previously been considered. Overall, studies have methodological limitations. However, six studies implemented in the past five years have shown more robust methodological designs, including larger sample sizes and more comprehensive measurement tools. Conclusion: It is not yet possible to draw a conclusion on the ideal PA intervention for this population due to the high proportion of heterogeneity within the included studies. More emphasis is needed on the intensity of PA monitoring and adherence to such programs.

Background: Despite physical activity (PA) health benefits, people with dementia (PwD) continue to report low levels of PA engagement compared with healthy older adults. Evidencing that PA initiatives still not reflect effective practice and outcomes. Previous studies have shown that several factors can mediate PA initiatives implementation in this population. However, most prior research have not use implementation science frameworks to outline in-depth barriers and facilitators that enables improved PA strategies in PwD. Therefore, a more holistic understanding of mediating factors is still needed. Objective: To identify multilevel barriers and facilitator factors, applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to orient a systematic evaluation of one PA project in PwD and provide evidence-based evaluation results to enhance PA implementation efforts for PwD. Method: A qualitative study implemented in 4 German sports associations that applied a PA project for PwD. A total of 13 semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 participants, project leaders (PLs) and sports trainers (STs). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as an evaluation framework to orient both the data collection and analysis. Results: A total of 13 interviews were conducted with 21 participants. The CFIR guided the identification of barriers and facilitating factors that need to be targeted at different levels for successful implementation. Barriers were identified, especially in the external level, as more solid networks and funding for sustainable proposals are still needed. Other barriers were low participation rates, stigma around the disease and the COVID 19 pandemic. On an individual and structural level facilitators were found like motivated appointed leaders, established planning process, and external organizations supporting sports associations in the implementation. Conclusion: Sports projects for PwD can benefit from structuring their interventions based on the CFIR framework as it helps identify multilevel factors that may influence their success and promote PA among PwD. Future efforts should continue working on implementing frameworks that facilitate and reduce the complexity of implementing sustainable PA projects for PwD.

Background: Multimorbidity is a common issue in aging societies and is usually associated with dementia in older people. Physical activity (PA) may be a beneficial nonpharmacological strategy for patients with complex health needs. However, insufficient PA is predominant in this population. Thus, there is an evident need to expand the knowledge on potential determinants influencing PA engagement among elderly persons at risk of dementia and multimorbidity. Methods: We used baseline data from the multicenter, cluster-randomized controlled AgeWell.de study. The main aim was to describe PA engagement and identify potential PA determinants in a sample of community-dwelling Germans aged 60–77 years old with an increased risk of dementia and multimorbidity. Results: Of the 1030 included participants, approximately half (51.8%) engaged in PA ≥2 times/week for at least 30 min at baseline. We identified self-efficacy (beta = 0.202, (p < 0.001) and BMI (beta = −0.055, (p < 0.001) as potential PA determinants. Conclusions: The identified determinants, self-efficacy, and BMI are consistent with those reported in the literature. Specific knowledge on PA determinants and stages of change in persons with risk of dementia and multimorbidity might guide the development of effective future prevention measures and health services tailored to this population. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (reference number: DRKS00013555).

While regular physical-activity (PA) is beneficial, multimorbid individuals at increased dementia risk may exhibit reduced PA levels. Thus, a more comprehensive understanding of mediating factors responsible for inactivity in this population is needed. This study investigated the impact of a multimodal intervention on PA changes at 24-month follow-up and associated mediating factors among community-dwelling patients aged 60-77, with increased dementia risk determined by the CAIDE Dementia Risk Score. Of 1030 participants recruited, 819 completed the assessment. Thus, a generalized estimating equations model initially assessed differences in PA over 24 months, followed by a tree analysis identifying mediating factors influencing PA changes post-intervention. While no significant effect on regular PA was found during the follow-up ( P = .674), subgroup analysis revealed improved self-efficacy ( P = .000) associated with increased engagement in PA. Incorporating self-efficacy elements into future strategies is crucial for promoting PA among individuals with multimorbidity and at increased dementia risk.

Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of adherence to the intervention components on the effectiveness of AgeWell.de, a multi-domain lifestyle intervention against cognitive decline, on function in everyday activities, quality of life, depressiveness and social isolation. Objective: Studying the effect of adherence on health-related outcomes. Methods: Participants were aged 60–77 years at baseline and at risk (Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Ageing and Dementia Score (CAIDE) ≥9). Adherence to the components nutrition, enhancement of physical and social activities and cognitive training was analyzed in two ways, first continual within the intervention group (n = 378, mean age = 69.1 years, 52.7% female) and second as dichotomous split (75% adherence) and in reference to the control group (received infomaterial and regular health advice; n = 441, mean age = 69 years, 53% female). Generalized linear regression models were then run on the health outcomes functioning in everyday activities, quality of life, depressive symptoms, and social inclusion. Results: Health-related quality of life and depressiveness were improved in participants with better adherence to nutritional counselling and enhancement of physical and social activities. Better adherence to social activities was relevant for function in everyday activities. Effects of high adherence to cognitive training was found for improvements in depressiveness when comparing it to the control group. No effect was found on social inclusion when considering the particular components. Conclusions: The extent of adherence to most components influenced health-related outcomes such as health-related quality of life and depressiveness. With this study, the effectiveness of AgeWell.de can be understood in greater depth. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS; ID: DRKS00013555).

Dementia and other neurodegenerative disorders place growing pressure on European health systems, yet evidence on how care pathways are structured, implemented, and evaluated remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesizes European evidence on dementia and neurodegenerative care pathways and develops an evidence-informed conceptual synthesis capturing core functions, domains of care delivery, and cross-cutting implementation principles. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251020962). Five databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) and gray literature sources were searched for studies published in the last 10 years (to June 2025) examining structured care pathways. Risk of bias was assessed using design-specific tools (RoB-2, ROBINS-I, MMAT), and findings were synthesized narratively due to substantial heterogeneity. Eighty-one studies from 11 European countries and multinational initiatives were included. Reported pathways varied widely in scope, structure, and implementation. Most focused on early-stage processes (referral, diagnosis, and initial post-diagnostic support), while later-stage elements (long-term management, advance care planning, and palliative care) were less frequently represented in the literature. Across studies, a consistent functional core was recurrently reported, including care coordination, multidisciplinary teamwork, case management, caregiver involvement, and structured follow-up. Surrounding domains, such as workforce training, digital and assistive technologies, and quality measurement, were described with variable levels of formalization. Findings reflect patterns reported in the literature rather than a direct representation of routine care across European health systems. Substantial heterogeneity in study designs, reporting practices, and pathway descriptions limited comparability across contexts. This review identifies common organizational functions underlying dementia care pathways and proposes an evidence-informed conceptual framework to support interpretation, comparison, and future development of more integrated and person-centered care models.