Mark Driscoll

Dr. Mark Driscoll

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2021 in ISA Transactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Brahim BrahmiBrahim Brahmi
Brahim Brahmi
MDMark Driscoll
Mark Driscoll
IBIbrahim K. El Bojairami
Ibrahim K. El Bojairami
MSMaarouf Saad
Maarouf Saad
ABAbdelkrim Brahmi
Abdelkrim Brahmi

9 December 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IBIbrahim El Bojairami
Ibrahim El Bojairami
KEKhaled El-Monajjed
Khaled El-Monajjed
MDMark Driscoll
Mark Driscoll
Numerous spine Finite Element (FE) models have been developed to assess spinal tolerances, spinal loadings and low back pain-related issues. However, justified simplifications, in terms of tissue decomposition and inclusion, for such a complex system may overlook crucial information. Thus, the purpose of this research was to develop and validate a comprehensive and representative spine FE model inclusive of an accurate representation of all major torso elements. A comprehensive model comprised of 273 tissues was developed via a novel FE meshing method to enhance computational feasibility. A comprehensive set of indirect validation tests were carried out to validate every aspect of the model. Under an increasing angular displacement of 24°–41°, the lumbar spine recorded an increasing moment from 5.5 to 9.3 Nm with an increase in IVD pressures from 0.41 to 0.66 MPa. Under forward flexion, vertical vertebral displacements simulated a 6% and 13% maximum discrepancy for intra-abdominal and intramuscular pressure results, all closely resembling previously documented in silico measured values. The developed state-of-the-art model includes most physiological tissues known to contribute to spinal loadings. Given the simulation’s accuracy, confirmed by its validation tests, the developed model may serve as a reliable spinal assessment tool.

1 September 2021 in Computers in Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SASami Alkadri
Sami Alkadri
NLNicole Ledwos
Nicole Ledwos
NMNykan Mirchi
Nykan Mirchi
ARAiden Reich
Aiden Reich
RYRecai Yilmaz
Recai Yilmaz
RMRolando F. Del Maestro
Rolando F. Del Maestro

20 September 2021 in Spine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IBIbrahim El Bojairami
Ibrahim El Bojairami
MDMark Driscoll
Mark Driscoll
Study Design.: Numerical in-silico human spine stability finite element analysis. Objective.: The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of major torso tissues toward static spine stability, mainly the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF), abdominal wall with its intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and spinal muscles inclusive of their intramuscular pressure. Summary of Background Data.: Given the numerous redundancies involved in the spine, current methodologies for assessing static spinal stability are limited to specific tissues and could lead to inconclusive results. A three-dimensional finite element model of the spine, with structured analysis of major torso tissues, allows for objective investigation of static spine stability. Methods.: A novel previously fully validated spine model was employed. Major torso tissues, mainly the muscles, TLF, and IAP were individually, and in combinations, activated under a 350N external spine perturbation. The stability contribution exerted by these tissues, or their ability to restore the spine to the unperturbed position, was assessed in different case-scenarios. Results.: Individual activations recorded significantly different stability contributions, with the highest being the TLF at 75%. Combined or synergistic activations showed an increase of up to 93% stability contribution when all tissues were simultaneously activated with a corresponding decrease in the tensile load exerted by the tissues themselves. Conclusion.: This investigation demonstrated torso tissues exhibiting different roles toward static spine stability. The TLF appeared able to dissipate and absorb excessive loads, the muscles acted as antagonistic to external perturbations, and the IAP played a role limiting movement. Furthermore, the different combinations explored suggested an optimized engagement and coordination between different tissues to achieve a specific task, while minimizing individual work. Level of Evidence: N/A

6 June 2018 in Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMark Driscoll
Mark Driscoll

28 April 2023 in Computers in Biology and Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBrittany Stott
Brittany Stott
MDMark Driscoll
Mark Driscoll