Differences in sex development (DSD) in patients with 46,XX karyotype occur by foetal or postnatal exposure to an increased amount of androgens. These disorders are usually diagnosed at birth, in newborns with abnormal genitalia, or later, due to postnatal virilization, usually at puberty. Proper diagnosis and therapy are mostly based on the knowledge of normal development and molecular etiopathogenesis of the gonadal and adrenal structures. This review aims to describe the most relevant data that are correlated with the normal and abnormal development of adrenal and gonadal structures in direct correlation with their utility in clinical practice, mainly in patients with 46,XX karyotype. We described the prenatal development of structures together with the main molecules and pathways that are involved in sex development. The second part of the review described the physical, imaging, hormonal and genetic evaluation in a patient with a disorder of sex development, insisting more on patients with 46,XX karyotype. Further, 95% of the etiology in 46,XX patients with disorders of sex development is due to congenital adrenal hyperplasia, by enzyme deficiencies that are involved in the hormonal synthesis pathway. The other cases are explained by genetic abnormalities that are involved in the development of the genital system. The phenotypic variability is very important in 46,XX disorders of sex development and the knowledge of each sign, even the most discreet, which could reveal such disorders, mainly in the neonatal period, could influence the evolution, prognosis and life quality long term.

Differences in sex development (DSD) are often correlated with a genetic etiology. This study aimed to assess the etiology of DSD patients following a protocol of genetic testing. Materials and methods. This study prospectively investigated a total of 267 patients with DSD who presented to Clinical Emergency Hospital for Children Cluj-Napoca between January 2012 and December 2019. Each patient was clinically, biochemically, and morphologically evaluated. As a first intervention, the genetic test included karyotype + SRY testing. A high value of 17-hydroxyprogesterone was found in 39 patients, in whom strip assay analysis of the CYP21A2 gene was subsequently performed. A total of 35 patients were evaluated by chromosomal microarray technique, and 22 patients were evaluated by the NGS of a gene panel. Results. The karyotype analysis established the diagnosis in 15% of the patients, most of whom presented with sex chromosome abnormalities. Genetic testing of CYP21A2 established a confirmation of the diagnosis in 44% of patients tested. SNP array analysis was particularly useful in patients with syndromic DSD; 20% of patients tested presented with pathogenic CNVs or uniparental disomy. Gene panel sequencing established the diagnosis in 11 of the 22 tested patients (50%), and the androgen receptor gene was most often involved in these patients. The genes that presented as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants or variants of uncertain significance were RSPO1, FGFR1, WT1, CHD7, AR, NIPBL, AMHR2, AR, EMX2, CYP17A1, NR0B1, GNRHR, GATA4, and ATM genes. Conclusion. An evaluation following a genetic testing protocol that included karyotype and SRY gene testing, CYP21A2 analysis, chromosomal analysis by microarray, and high-throughput sequencing were useful in establishing the diagnosis, with a spectrum of diagnostic yield depending on the technique (between 15 and 50%). Additionally, new genetic variants not previously described in DSD were observed.

Background: Noonan syndrome (NS) is a genetically heterogeneous condition within the RASopathies spectrum, with distinctive craniofacial features, congenital heart defects, short stature, and variably present developmental delay. Most cases result from variants in genes regulating the RAS/MAPK pathway, with PTPN11 variants being the most frequent; the c.922A>G substitution being among the most commonly reported. Methods: This pilot study analyzed clinical and partial genetic features of NS in a cohort from Transylvania, evaluated in the Children’s Emergency Clinical Hospital in Cluj-Napoca. Thirty-one patients fulfilling the Van der Burgt diagnostic criteria (twenty-two males, nine females) were included. Clinical data were systematically reviewed, and targeted molecular testing for the PTPN11 c.922A>G variant was performed. Results: Congenital heart defects were highly prevalent, with pulmonary stenosis representing the most frequent anomaly (54.8%). Craniofacial dysmorphism was observed in 76.7% of cases, cryptorchidism in 50% of the males, and short stature below the third percentile was described in 77.4% of patients. Genetic screening identified the PTPN11 c.922A>G variant in two individuals (6.45%). Additional diagnoses included Williams–Beuren syndrome and a 17q11.2 deletion consistent with Neurofibromatosis–Noonan syndrome, underscoring the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of the cohort. Comparison with international reports highlighted variability in phenotype and variant frequency. Future research directions include Sanger sequencing of key PTPN11 exons and the application of next-generation sequencing targeting all RAS pathway genes. Conclusions: This is the first Romanian cohort study on patients with a clinical suspicion of NS, providing insight into their evaluation. The findings reinforce the need for comprehensive molecular approaches, facilitating diagnostic precision and counseling strategies.

Background: RASopathies represent a clinically and genetically diverse group of syndromes resulting from germline mutations in genes regulating the RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade. Methods: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features and genetic variants identified in patients with genetically confirmed Noonan syndrome (NS) in a limited cohort from Romania. A total of 25 patients with positive genetic testing for NS-associated genes were included. Genetic testing was performed primarily using next-generation sequencing. Results: A total of twenty-six variants were identified in twenty-five patients, as one patient carried two pathogenic variants in the PTPN11 gene (c.188A>G and c.922A>G). Of these variants, twenty-four (92.31%) were classified as pathogenic and two (7.69%) as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Pathogenic variants were found in different genes, including PTPN11, LZTR1, SOS1, and RAF1, with PTPN11 being the most frequently affected gene. Males predominated (17/25), with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1. Two patients inherited the pathogenic variant from an affected parent. Cardiovascular involvement was present in 21 patients (84%), with pulmonary valve stenosis (PVS) being the most common finding (48%), followed by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (16%). Additional cardiac anomalies included atrial septal defect, valvular regurgitation, dysplastic valves, coarctation of the aorta, and sinotubular junction narrowing. Short stature was observed in 64% of patients, and craniofacial dysmorphism was present in 96%. Cutaneous, ectodermal, dental, ophthalmologic, and auditory manifestations were variably observed. Conclusions: Although based on a limited cohort from Romania, this study provides insights into clinical features suggestive of NS. Our findings highlight the genetic heterogeneity of NS and emphasize the importance of comprehensive genetic testing for confirming diagnosis, guiding clinical management, and supporting family counseling.