Summary: The effects of cerivastatin and fenofibrate on proteins involved in haemostasis and on markers of inflammation were investigated in otherwise healthy middle-aged males with combined hyperlipidemia. Besides classical risk factors, other so-called novel risk factors for coronary artery disease are seen to be playing an increasingly important role in the development and progression of atherosclerosis. Thirty-eight males, aged 49 ± 5 years were randomised to 12 weeks treatment either with cerivastatin at a daily dose of 0.2 mg to 0.4 mg to achieve the LDL cholesterol goal of <3.0 mM, or with fenofibrate 250 mg daily. Fasting serum lipids, homocysteine, total and free tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) antigen and activity, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were measured. No change in homocysteine level was observed in the cerivastatin group, while after fenofibrate administration it increased (p <0.0001).Total TFPI decreased significantly after cerivastatin (p = 0.002), but not after fenofibrate. Free TFPI did not decrease after either drug. Neither drug affected (t-PA) antigen and activity, while fenofibrate increased PAI-1 antigen (p <0.05) and activity (p <0.05). Cerivastatin decreased serum CRP values by 49.5% (p = 0.001), and fenofibrate by 29.8% (p = 0.03). The decreases of CRP in the two groups differed significantly (p = 0.04). IL-6 levels decreased significantly in the fenofibrate group (39%; p <0.0001), but not in the cerivastatin group (15%; p = 0.24) No significant decreases were observed for TNF-α. Cerivastatin had neutral effects on fibrinolysis, homocysteine or coagulation. On the other hand, fenofibrate increased PAI-1 antigen and activity and homocysteine, and did not affect coagulation. Both cerivastatin and fenofibrate reduced CRP levels, the decrease being significantly greater after cerivastatin. Fenofibrate also significantly decreased IL-6.

Background Direct oral anticoagulant dabigatran was first introduced as a fixed-dose drug without routine coagulation monitoring, but current recommendations suggest that diluted thrombin time can be used to estimate plasma drug level. The aim of this study was to assess a diluted thrombin time assay based on the same thrombin reagent already used for traditional thrombin time measurements that reliably measure low to intermediate plasma dabigatran levels. Methods We included 44 patients with atrial fibrillation who started treatment with dabigatran 150 mg (23 patients) or 110 mg (21 patients) twice a day. Blood samples were collected at baseline (no dabigatran) and 2–4 weeks after the beginning of dabigatran therapy at trough and at peak. Plasma dabigatran levels were measured with diluted thrombin time and compared to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry as the reference method. The performance of the diluted thrombin time was compared to Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor and Ecarin Chromogenic Assay. Results In ex vivo plasma samples, diluted thrombin time highly correlated with the liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (Pearson’s R = 0.9799). In the low to intermediate range (dabigatran concentration ≤ 100 µg/L) diluted thrombin time correlated significantly more closely to the liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (R = 0.964) than Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor (R = 0.935, p = 0.05) or Ecarin Chromogenic Assay (R = 0.915, p < 0.01). It was also the only functional assay without any significant bias in the low to intermediate range. Both trough and peak diluted thrombin time values were similar to liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Conclusion We conclude that the diluted thrombin time assay presented in this study reliably detects dabigatran and that it is superior to the Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor assay in the low to intermediate range.

To investigate the effects of clopidogrel and eptifibatide on platelet reactivity in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and hypothermia. VerifyNow® and Multiplate® aggregometry were used before, and 4, 12, 22 and 48 hours after 600 mg clopidogrel treatment in 28 post-cardiac arrest hypothermic patients and in 14 normothermic patients with acute coronary syndrome. Basal platelet reactivity after stimulation with iso-thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) and PAR4-activating peptide (BASE) was significantly lower in the post-cardiac arrest group and persisted up to 48 hours. The antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel measured by VerifyNow and expressed as % inhibition was significantly lower in the post-cardiac arrest group. It was close to zero with an increase to only around 10% after 48 hours. Post-cardiac arrest patients receiving eptifibatide showed profound platelet inhibition measured by both VerifyNow IIb/IIIa and Multiplate TRAP tests for at least 22 hours after administration. Post-resuscitation syndrome with ongoing hypothermia is associated with decreased platelet reactivity. Clopidogrel loading does not significantly affect platelet function during the first 48 hours. This is in contrast with eptifibatide which produces profound platelet inhibition, and may be used to bridge insufficient inhibition by clopidogrel.