Marc Sim

Dr. Marc Sim


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 May 2019 in European Journal of Applied Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MSMarc Sim
Marc Sim
LGLaura A. Garvican-Lewis
Laura A. Garvican-Lewis
GCGregory Ronald Cox
Gregory Ronald Cox
AGAndrew Govus
Andrew Govus
AMAlannah K. A. McKay
Alannah K. A. McKay
PPPeter Peeling
Peter Peeling

1 March 2018 in International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPeter Peeling
Peter Peeling
MBMartyn John Binnie
Martyn John Binnie
PGPaul S.R. Goods
Paul S.R. Goods
MSMarc Sim
Marc Sim
LBLouise M. Burke
Louise M. Burke
A strong foundation in physical conditioning and sport-specific experience, in addition to a bespoke and periodized training and nutrition program, are essential for athlete development. Once these underpinning factors are accounted for, and the athlete reaches a training maturity and competition level where marginal gains determine success, a role may exist for the use of evidence-based performance supplements. However, it is important that any decisions surrounding performance supplements are made in consideration of robust information that suggests the use of a product is safe, legal, and effective. The following review focuses on the current evidence-base for a number of common (and emerging) performance supplements used in sport. The supplements discussed here are separated into three categories based on the level of evidence supporting their use for enhancing sports performance: (1) established (caffeine, creatine, nitrate, beta-alanine, bicarbonate); (2) equivocal (citrate, phosphate, carnitine); and (3) developing. Within each section, the relevant performance type, the potential mechanisms of action, and the most common protocols used in the supplement dosing schedule are summarized.

19 January 2021 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKevin Leow
Kevin Leow
PSPawel Szulc
Pawel Szulc
JSJohn T. Schousboe
John T. Schousboe
DKDouglas P Kiel
Douglas P Kiel
ATArmando Teixeira‐Pinto
Armando Teixeira‐Pinto
JLJoshua R. Lewis
Joshua R. Lewis
Background: The prognostic importance of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) viewed on noninvasive imaging modalities remains uncertain. Methods and Results: We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE and Embase) until March 2018. Multiple reviewers identified prospective studies reporting AAC and incident cardiovascular events or all‐cause mortality. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data. Summary risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using random‐effects models comparing the higher AAC groups combined (any or more advanced AAC) to the lowest reported AAC group. We identified 52 studies (46 cohorts, 36 092 participants); only studies of patients with chronic kidney disease (57%) and the general older‐elderly (median, 68 years; range, 60–80 years) populations (26%) had sufficient data to meta‐analyze. People with any or more advanced AAC had higher risk of cardiovascular events (RR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.40–2.39), fatal cardiovascular events (RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.44–2.39), and all‐cause mortality (RR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.55–2.53). Patients with chronic kidney disease with any or more advanced AAC had a higher risk of cardiovascular events (RR, 3.47; 95% CI, 2.21–5.45), fatal cardiovascular events (RR, 3.68; 95% CI, 2.32–5.84), and all‐cause mortality (RR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.95–2.97). Conclusions: Higher‐risk populations, such as the elderly and those with chronic kidney disease with AAC have substantially greater risk of future cardiovascular events and poorer prognosis. Providing information on AAC may help clinicians understand and manage patients' cardiovascular risk better.

25 March 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPeter Peeling
Peter Peeling
MSMarc Sim
Marc Sim
Claire Evelyn BadenhorstClaire Evelyn Badenhorst
Claire Evelyn Badenhorst
BDBrian Dawson
Brian Dawson
AGAndrew D. Govus
Andrew D. Govus
DTDebbie Trinder
Debbie Trinder
This study explored the relationship between serum ferritin and hepcidin in athletes. Baseline serum ferritin levels of 54 athletes from the control trial of five investigations conducted in our laboratory were considered; athletes were grouped according to values <30 μg/L (SF100 μg/L (SF>100). Data pooling resulted in each athlete completing one of five running sessions: (1) 8×3 min at 85% vVO2peak; (2) 5×4 min at 90% vVO2peak; (3) 90 min continuous at 75% vVO2peak; (4) 40 min continuous at 75% vVO2peak; (5) 40 min continuous at 65% vVO2peak. Athletes from each running session were represented amongst all four groups; hence, the mean exercise duration and intensity were not different (p>0.05). Venous blood samples were collected pre-, post- and 3 h post-exercise, and were analysed for serum ferritin, iron, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and hepcidin-25. Baseline and post-exercise serum ferritin levels were different between groups (p0.05). Post-exercise IL-6 was significantly elevated compared to baseline within each group (p<0.05). Pre- and 3 h post-exercise hepcidin-25 was sequentially greater as the groups baseline serum ferritin levels increased (p100; p<0.05). An athlete's iron stores may dictate the baseline hepcidin levels and the magnitude of post-exercise hepcidin response. Low iron stores suppressed post-exercise hepcidin, seemingly overriding any inflammatory-driven increases.

11 May 2018 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LBLauren Blekkenhorst
Lauren Blekkenhorst
MSMarc Sim
Marc Sim
CBCatherine Bondonno
Catherine Bondonno
NBNicola Bondonno
Nicola Bondonno
NWNatalie Ward
Natalie Ward
JHJonathan Hodgson
Jonathan Hodgson
Adequate vegetable consumption is one of the cornerstones of a healthy diet. The recommendation to increase vegetable intake is part of most dietary guidelines. Despite widespread and long-running public health messages to increase vegetable intake, similar to other countries worldwide, less than 1 in 10 adult Australians manage to meet target advice. Dietary guidelines are predominantly based on studies linking diets high in vegetables with lower risk of chronic diseases. Identifying vegetables with the strongest health benefits and incorporating these into dietary recommendations may enhance public health initiatives around vegetable intake. These enhanced public health initiatives would be targeted at reducing the risk of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Specific vegetable types contain high levels of particular nutrients and phytochemicals linked with cardiovascular health benefits. However, it is not clear if increasing intake of these specific vegetable types will result in larger benefits on risk of chronic diseases. This review presents an overview of the evidence for the relationships of specific types of vegetables, including leafy green, cruciferous, allium, yellow-orange-red and legumes, with subclinical and clinical CVD outcomes in observational epidemiological studies.

4 January 2024 in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EDElsa Dent
Elsa Dent
JVJack Dalla Via
Jack Dalla Via
TBTrent Bozanich
Trent Bozanich
EHEmiel O Hoogendijk
Emiel O Hoogendijk
AGAbadi K Gebre
Abadi K Gebre
MSMarc Sim
Marc Sim
Frailty is associated with declines in physiological capacity across sensory, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. An underlying assumption is that the frailer an individual, the more likely they are to experience falls and fractures. We examined whether grades of frailty can assess the long-term risk of hospitalized falls, fractures, and all-cause mortality in 1261 community-dwelling older women (mean age [SD] of 75.1 [2.7] yr) over 14.5 yr. Frailty was operationalized using a frailty index (FI) of cumulative deficits from 33 variables across multiple health domains (physical, mental, comorbidities) at baseline. The total score across these variables was summed and divided by 33 to obtain the FI. Participants were graded as fit (FI ≤ 0.12), mildly frail (FI > 0.12–0.24), moderately frail (FI > 0.24–0.36), or severely frail (FI > 0.36). Fall-related (n = 498), any fracture-related (n = 347), and hip fracture–related hospitalizations (n = 137) and deaths (n = 482) were obtained from linked health records. Associations between FI grades and clinical outcomes were analyzed using multivariable-adjusted Cox-proportional hazard models including age, treatment (calcium/placebo), BMI, smoking history, socioeconomic status, plasma vitamin D (25OHD) status plus season obtained, physical activity, self-reported prevalent falls in the last 3 mo, and self-reported fractures since the age of 50 yr. At baseline, 713 (56.5%), 350 (27.8%), 163 (12.9%), and 35 (2.8%) of women were classified as fit, mildly frail, moderately frail, and severely frail, respectively. Women with mild, moderate, and severe frailty had significantly higher hazards (all P < .05) for a fall-related (46%, 104%, 168%), any fracture-related (88% for moderate, 193% for severe frailty), hip fracture–related hospitalizations (93%, 127%, 129%), and all-cause mortality (47%, 126%, 242%). The FI identified community-dwelling older women at risk for the most serious falls and fractures and may be incorporated into risk assessment tools to identify individuals with poorer clinical prognosis. Frailty is often linked to decline in the sensory, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. Frailty can be identified and graded using a frailty index (FI). In a cohort of 1261 community-dwelling older women with an average age of 75 yr, this study found that increasing grades of frailty fit, (mildly, moderately and severely frail) were associated with higher long-term risk for a fall and/or fracture (including hip fractures) that required hospitalization. Increasing grades of frailty were also linked with greater risk of death, especially due to cardiovascular causes. In conclusion, the FI may be used to identify community-dwelling older women with a high long-term risk for the most serious falls and fractures, as well as individuals with a poorer prognosis.