Sustainability is a holistic and complex multi-dimensional concept comprising economic, social and environmental issues. The EU Sustainable Development Goals’ indicator set, developed by European Commission, is implemented online in Eurostat’s database and constitutes the basis for assessing the level of sustainability assessment in different areas. The integration of the sustainability indicators was carried out in many studies by using the multi-criteria techniques. This work proposes a new methodological framework based on extended TOPSIS procedure, which takes into account EU targets and/or national targets in building positive ideal solution and negative ideal solution. This algorithm allows compensatory and non-compensatory approach in integrated sustainability assessment from the target point of view. This framework has been applied to measure sustainable development in the area of education in 28 EU countries in 2015. The results of this research also illustrate the complexity of measuring sustainable development, where multiple sustainability criteria and targets are considered.

Benchmarking the analysis of countries' performance in terms of sustainable development helps to understand the success factors of countries that over perform and to target priority issues of others with lower performance. However, assessing sustainable development comes with methodological challenges, including indicator standardization, aggregation and weighting. Our study significantly contributes to the measure of sustainable development by providing a new approach based on an extended Hellwig method. After describing the main limitations of existing methodologies, this paper's aim is twofold. First, we show that the proposed analytical framework allows for comparing the sustainable performance of EU countries on the national level. The extended Hellwig method takes into consideration EU targets and/or national targets in building patterns of development. Second, this framework is tested as a part of the evaluation of the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy in the education area. The results obtained using the extended Hellwig method were compared with those obtained by means of the Education Index, TOPSIS and Ward technique. Our analysis showed the significant disparities in the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy recommendations in the education area in 2015.

Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on reference points and distances from them are essential for evaluating alternatives across multiple criteria. These methods provide structured approaches to comparing and ranking alternatives relative to specified reference points. The main objective of this paper is to present the Multi-Criteria Method Integrating Distances to Ideal and Anti-ideal Points (MIDIA), which, through a weighted system, allows for the consideration of balance and asymmetry in assessing alternatives based on their distances from the ideal and anti-ideal points. As a multi-criteria algorithm, MIDIA is user-friendly and reflects the human mind’s natural tendency to assess objects based on fundamental concepts—comparison with the ideal solution and the anti-ideal solution—that are familiar from everyday experiences and provide valuable insights from a behavioral perspective. Moreover, the proposed method can be seen as an extension of Hellwig’s approach, designed to facilitate the ranking of alternatives based on two reference points: the ideal point and the anti-ideal point, measuring the distance between the alternative and the ideal point and the distance between the ideal and anti-ideal points. The MIDIA method integrates elements from both TOPSIS and VIKOR, by incorporating the structure of TOPSIS and the compromise perspective of VIKOR, offering a balanced approach to multi-criteria decision-making by focusing on the distances from ideal and anti-ideal points. Illustrative examples are given to demonstrate the usability of the proposed tool in situations where the decision-maker has asymmetrical preferences concerning the importance of ideal and anti-ideal points in ranking alternatives. Moreover, the MIDIA method is applied to one of the Sustainable Development Goals, in the area of education (SDG4), to obtain the rankings of EU member countries in 2022. The results obtained using the MIDIA method were compared with those obtained using the TOPSIS and VIKOR approaches. The study concludes that the ranking of alternatives depends on the coefficients of the importance of the distances to reference points and the data setup.

One of the crucial steps in the multi-criteria decision analysis involves establishing the importance of criteria and determining the relationship between them. This paper proposes an extended Hellwig’s method (H_EM) that utilizes entropy-based weights and Mahalanobis distance to address this issue. By incorporating the concept of entropy, weights are determined based on their information content represented by the matrix data. The Mahalanobis distance is employed to address interdependencies among criteria, contributing to the improved performance of the proposed framework. To illustrate the relevance and effectiveness of the extended H_EM method, this study utilizes it to assess the progress toward achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4 of the 2030 Agenda within the European Union countries for education in the year 2021. Performance comparison is conducted between results obtained by the extended Hellwig’s method and its other variants. The results reveal a significant impact on the ranking of the EU countries in the education area, depending on the choice of distance measure (Euclidean or Mahalanobis) and the system of weights (equal or entropy-based). Overall, this study highlights the potential of the proposed method in addressing complex decision-making scenarios with interdependent criteria.

This study proposes a novel fuzzy framework for eliciting and organizing the preference information of the negotiator to allow for the evaluation of negotiation offers. The approach is based on verbal evaluation of negotiation options that operates with linguistic variables to handle vague preferences and operationalizes them through oriented trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Two variants of the linguistic method based on Hellwig’s approach and oriented fuzzy numbers are proposed, which can be applied to building a scoring system for the negotiation template. Then, an example of determining such a scoring system and using it to evaluate the negotiation offers in typical multi-issue negotiation is shown. The results are discussed and compared with other methods known from the literature, in which the preference information is organized similarly but processed differently. The comparison shows that the presented methods can be an alternative to Simple Additive Weighting or TOPSIS methods that may also operate with oriented fuzzy numbers, but some of their characteristics may be problematic from the viewpoint of data interpretation. The former requires defuzzification of the global scores determined, while the latter requires the compulsory use of two reference points derived mechanically out of the negotiation space. By applying modified Hellwig’s approaches, the former and the latter may be easily avoided.

In this paper, an extended Intuitionistic Fuzzy Synthetic Measure (IFSM) with intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) entropy-based weights is presented. This method can be implemented in a ranking problem where the assessments of the criteria are expressed in the form of intuitionistic fuzzy values and the information about the importance criteria is unknown. One example of such a problem is measuring the subjective quality of life in cities. We join the debate on the determination of weights for the analysis of the quality of life problem using multi-criteria methods. To handle this problem, four different IF entropy-based weight methods were applied. Their performances were compared and analyzed based on the questionnaires from the survey concerning the quality of life in European cities. The studies show very similar weighting systems obtained by different IF entropy-based approaches, resulting in almost the same city rankings acquired through IFSM by using those weights. The differences in rankings obtained through the IFSM measure (and only by one position) concern the six cities included in the analysis. Our results support the assumption of the equal importance of the criteria in measuring this complex phenomenon.