Blunt cardiac trauma: a narrative review Ryaan EL-Andari, Devin O'Brien, Sabin J. Bozso, Jeevan Nagendran

Background: Sinus venosus atrial septal defect (SVASD) is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly comprising 5% to 10% of all atrial septal defects. Although surgical closure is the standard treatment for SVASD, data on outcomes have been confined to small cohorts. Thus, we conducted a systematic review of the outcomes of SVASD repair. Methods and Results: The primary outcome was death. Secondary outcomes encompassed atrial fibrillation, sinus node dysfunction, pacemaker insertion, cerebrovascular accident, reoperation, residual septal defect, superior vena cava obstruction, and reimplanted pulmonary vein obstruction. Pooled incidences of outcomes were calculated using a random‐effects model. Forty studies involving 1320 patients who underwent SVASD repair were included. The majority were male patients (55.4%), with 88.0% presenting with associated anomalous pulmonary venous connection. The weighted mean age was 18.6±12.5 years, and the overall weighted mean follow‐up period was 8.6±10.4 years. The in‐hospital mortality rate was 0.24%, with a 30‐day mortality rate of 0.5% reported in 780 patients. Incidences of atrial fibrillation, sinus node dysfunction, pacemaker insertion, and cerebrovascular accident over the long‐term follow‐up were 3.3% (2.18%–4.93%), 6.5% (5.09%–8.2%), 2.23% (1.34%–3.57%), and 2.03% (0.89%–2.46%) respectively. Reoperation occurred in 1.36% (0.68%–2.42%) of surgeries, residual septal defect in 1.34% (0.69%–2.42%), superior vena cava obstruction in 1.76% (1.02%–2.9%), and reimplanted pulmonary vein obstruction in 1.4% (0.7%–2.49%). Conclusions: This is the first comprehensive analysis of outcomes following surgical repair of SVASD. The findings affirm the safety and effectiveness of surgery, establishing a reference point for evaluating emerging transcatheter therapies. Safety and efficacy profiles comparable to surgical repair are essential for widespread adoption of transcatheter treatments.

Valvular heart disease continues to afflict millions of people around the world. In many cases, the only corrective treatment for valvular heart disease is valve replacement. Valve replacement options are currently limited, and the most common construct utilized are xenogenic tissue heart valves. The main limitation with the use of this valve type is the development of valvular deterioration. Valve deterioration results in intrinsic permanent changes in the valve structure, often leading to hemodynamic compromise and clinical symptoms of valve re‐stenosis. A significant amount of research has been performed regarding the incidence of valve deterioration and determination of significant risk factors for its development. As a result, many believe that the underlying driver of valve deterioration is a chronic immune‐mediated rejection process of the foreign xenogenic‐derived tissue. The underlying mechanisms of how this occurs are an area of ongoing research and active debate. In this review, we provide an overview of the important components of the immune system and how they respond to xenografts. A review of the proposed mechanisms of xenogenic heart valve deterioration is provided including the immune response to xenografts. Finally, we discuss the role of strategies to combat valve degeneration such as preservation protocols, epitope modification and decellularization.

Background and objective: The published literature investigating the impact of sex on outcomes after mitral valve (MV) surgery has demonstrated inferior outcomes for females over males. However, the true relationship between sex and outcomes after MV surgery continues to be poorly understood. Materials: PubMed, Medline, and Embase were systematically searched for articles published from 1 January 2005 to 1 August 2021. This systematic review included retrospective and prospective studies investigating the relationship between sex and outcomes after MV surgery. In all, 2068 articles were initially screened and 12 studies were included in this review. Results: Few studies were adequately powered or structured to investigate this topic. Few studies propensity matched patients or isolated for surgical approach. In individual studies, females experienced increased rates of short-term and long-term mortality and increased 1-year mortality in the pooled data. Males experienced increased rates of required pacemaker insertion. The remaining rates of morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly between males and females. Conclusions: This review identified increased rates of 1-year mortality in the pooled data for females, while males had increased rates of pacemaker insertion. Despite this, the absence of propensity matching and isolating for surgical approach has introduced confounding variables that impair the ability of the included studies to interpret the results found in the current literature. Studies isolating for surgical approach, propensity matching patients, and examining outcomes with long-term follow-up are required to elucidate the true nature of this relationship.

Background: Most of the studies of obesity and postoperative outcome have looked predominantly at coronary artery bypass grafting with fewer focused on valvular disease. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement stratified by body mass index (BMI, kg/m^2). Methods: The Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease registry captured 4780 aortic valve replacements in Alberta, Canada from January 2004 to December 2018. All recipients were stratified by BMI into five groups (BMI: < 20, 20–24.9, 25–29.9, 30–34.9, and > = 35). Log-rank test and Cox regression were used to examine the crude and adjusted survival differences. Results: Intra-operative clamp time and pump time were similar among the five groups. Significant statistical differences between groups existed for the incidence of isolated AVR, AVR and CABG, hemorrhage, septic infection, and deep sternal infection (p < 0.05). While there was no significant statistical difference in the mortality rate across the BMI groups, the underweight AVR patients (BMI < 20) were associated with increased hazard ratio (1.519; 95% confidence interval: 1.028–2.245) with regards to all-cause mortality at the longest follow-up compared with normal weight patients. Conclusion: Overweight and obese patients should be considered as readily for AVR as normal BMI patients.