Benoit Schaller

Prof. Benoit Schaller

Inselspital Bern
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 January 2016 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKEizaburo Kobayashi
Eizaburo Kobayashi
LFLaura Flückiger
Laura Flückiger
MFMasako Fujioka-Kobayashi
Masako Fujioka-Kobayashi
KSKosaku Sawada
Kosaku Sawada
ASAnton Sculean
Anton Sculean
RMRichard Miron
Richard Miron

1 June 2003 in Acta Neurochirurgica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MRM. Reinert
M. Reinert
ABA. Barth
A. Barth
HRH. U. Rothen
H. U. Rothen
BSBenoit Schaller
Benoit Schaller
JTJ. Takala
J. Takala
RSR. W. Seiler
R. W. Seiler

1 December 2001
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEAristomenis K. Exadaktylos
Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos
GSGuido Sclabas
Guido Sclabas
SSStephan W. Schmid
Stephan W. Schmid
BSBenoit Schaller
Benoit Schaller
HZHeinz Zimmermann
Heinz Zimmermann
A major cause of morbidity and mortality after blunt chest trauma remains undetected injuries. This study evaluates the role of routine computed tomographic (CT) scan. We studied 93 consecutive patients from January 1999 to July 2000: 73 (76.3%) after motor vehicle crash with crash speed > 10 mph, and 22 (23.7%) after fall from height > 5 ft. Simultaneous with initial clinical evaluation, anteroposterior chest radiograph and helical chest CT scan were obtained for all patients. Sixty-eight patients (73.1%) showed at least one pathologic sign on chest radiograph, and 25 patients (26.9%) had normal chest radiograph. In 13 (52.0%) of these 25 patients, the CT scan showed multiple injuries; among these were two aortic lacerations, three pleural effusions, and one pericardial effusion. Over 50% of patients with normal initial chest radiograph showed multiple injuries on the CT scan, among which were also two (8%) potentially fatal aortic lesions. We therefore recommend primary routine chest CT scan in all patients with major chest trauma.

1 December 2020 in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJudith Everts-Graber
Judith Everts-Graber
DLDaniel Lehmann
Daniel Lehmann
BPBurkhard John Patrik
Burkhard John Patrik
BSBenoit Schaller
Benoit Schaller
BGBrigitta Gahl
Brigitta Gahl
TLThomas Lehmann
Thomas Lehmann
Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare but serious adverse event associated with antiresorptive treatment. There is little evidence regarding the incidence of ONJ among patients with osteoporosis who are treated with denosumab versus bisphosphonates (BPs). The aim of this study was to determine the risk of ONJ in a real-world population. Subjects who underwent at least one dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examination were included in the osteoporosis register of the Swiss Society of Rheumatology between January 1, 2015, and September 30, 2019. Statistical analyses included incidence rates, rate ratios, and hazard ratios for ONJ, considering sequential therapies and drug holidays as covariates. Among 9956 registered patients, 3068 (89% female, median age 69 years [63 to 76]) were treated with BPs or denosumab for a cumulative duration of 11,101 and 4236 patient-years, respectively. Seventeen cases of ONJ were identified: 12 in patients receiving denosumab at the time of ONJ diagnosis and 5 in patients receiving oral or intravenous BP therapy. The diagnosis of ONJ was confirmed by independent and blinded maxillofacial surgeons, using the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons case definition of ONJ. The incidence of ONJ per 10,000 observed patient-years was 28.3 in patients receiving denosumab and 4.5 in patients with BP-associated ONJ, yielding a rate ratio of 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1 to 22.8), p < 0.001. Nine of 12 patients who developed ONJ during denosumab treatment had been pretreated with BPs, but none of the 5 patients with BP-related ONJ had previously received denosumab. The risk of ONJ was higher in patients receiving denosumab therapy compared with BPs (hazard ratio 3.49, 95% CI 1.16 to 10.47, p = 0.026). Previous BP therapy before switching to denosumab may be an additional risk factor for ONJ development. © 2021 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

1 November 2013 in Acta Biomaterialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TIT. Imwinkelried
T. Imwinkelried
SBS. Beck
S. Beck
TIT. Iizuka
T. Iizuka
BSBenoit Schaller
Benoit Schaller

16 August 2021 in Clinical Oral Investigations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DTDaniel Jan Toneatti
Daniel Jan Toneatti
RGRonny Roger Graf
Ronny Roger Graf
BPBurkhard John Patrik
Burkhard John Patrik
BSBenoit Schaller
Benoit Schaller
Objectives: This systematic review assesses dental implant survival, calculates the incidence rate of osteoradionecrosis, and evaluates risk factors in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. Materials and methods: Various databases (e.g., Medline/Embase using Ovid) and gray literature platforms were searched using a combination of keywords and subject headings. When appropriate, meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model. Otherwise, pooled analysis was applied. Results: A total of 425 of the 660 included patients received radiotherapy. In total, 2602 dental implants were placed, and 1637 were placed in irradiated patients. Implant survival after an average follow-up of 37.7 months was 97% (5% confidence interval, CI 95.2%, 95% CI 98.3%) in nonirradiated patients and 91.9% (5% CI 87.7%, 95% CI: 95.3%) after an average follow-up of 39.8 months in irradiated patients. Osteoradionecrosis occurred in 11 cases, leading to an incidence of 3% (5% CI 1.6%, 95% CI 4.9%). The main factors impacting implant survival were radiation and grafting status, while factors influencing osteoradionecrosis could not be determined using meta-analysis. Conclusion: Our data show that implant survival in irradiated patients is lower than in nonirradiated patients, and osteoradionecrosis is—while rare—a serious complication that any OMF surgeon should be prepared for. The key to success could be a standardized patient selection and therapy to improve the standard of care, reduce risks and shorten treatment time. Clinical relevance: Our analysis provides further evidence that implant placement is a feasible treatment option in irradiated head and neck cancer patients with diminished oral function and good long-term cancer prognosis.